Sign in to follow this  
sevensixtwo

My argument against the Riemann hypothesis

Recommended Posts

!

Moderator Note

 

You need to post enough of the argument on this site (not just dump a link to vixra) for members to be able to participate without downloading papers or accessing third party sites.

 

Please do so or thread will be locked

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)

My argument is that infinity is not symmetric about the origin and the gradient in the yellow and green region of pic related implies that the the Riemann zeta function has eigenvalues whose real parts are not equal to one half.

 

 

 

17312.png

Edited by sevensixtwo

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

One of the main problems with proving riemann in either way is that modern computers do not reliably compute floating point numbers to any degree of accuracy. If you wanted to really prove it you have to do the calculations by hand.

  • Downvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

One of the main problems with proving riemann in either way is that modern computers do not reliably compute floating point numbers to any degree of accuracy. If you wanted to really prove it you have to do the calculations by hand.

 

 

I would have expected a proof to be based on mathematics, not arithmetic.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Does the heavily coloured picture in post#3 come with any explanation?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I would have expected a proof to be based on mathematics, not arithmetic.​

 

 

Lots of maths problems have been solved through arithmetic. It is important to note though that because we can solve it with a computer we can't verify that a solution is correct in either way on a computer.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

Lots of maths problems have been solved through arithmetic. It is important to note though that because we can solve it with a computer we can't verify that a solution is correct in either way on a computer.

 

 

Then it isn't a proof.

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Does the heavily coloured picture in post#3 come with any explanation?

 

Not unless you read the paper that explains it.

  • Downvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

!

Moderator Note

 

762

OK - Last Chance. Either get with the programme and follow the rules or I lock the thread. I explained that members must be able to participate without leaving the site. You were asked a perfectly reasonable question - referring to an off-site download is not acceptable.

 

Do not respond to this moderation other than to either start posting details or acknowledging that you will not (in which case we can lock it and move on).

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

Sign in to follow this