Got any explanatory variables in mind?

你的意思是什么？

你的意思是什么？

我不明白中國人。你能不能用英語寫的？謝謝

 

Imatfaal

StringJunky, on 11 Jan 2015 - 02:51 AM, said:

你的意思是什么？

 

 

我不明白中國人。你能不能用英語寫的？謝謝

 

 

Nah, the correct response is

 

#########################

 

See Bletchly Park for details.

我不明白中國人。你能不能用英語寫的？謝謝

I don't know what he meant.

I don't know what he meant.

我也不

我也不

我以为他写的东西很可能会成为中国人！

If you guys keep using the wrong code I will have to send the man with the WaltherPPK to shoot you.

关于变量之间的关联，
该 explanatory variable 想必影响 response variable

关于变量之间的关联，

该 explanatory variable 想必影响 response variable

Having it on the View New Content page doesn't help. I've tried to find a way of globally omitting new posts from New Content but found no where free; you have to be a customer of IP Boards to access their advice. In general though, I think the frequency over time is generally random. If you get a particularly belligerent religious poster they are going to garner more responses and for longer, so of course, it pops up more frequently on New Content. At the end of day, if a thread is useless don't give it the oxygen of a response. Maybe the mods could set an arbitrary mental limit on the number of posts they will allow a crap thread to go on for before pulling the plug on it. It's a bit much imo when some threads can go on for 300-400 posts and they are clearly going nowhere but a ban or suspension.

Edited January 12, 201511 yr by StringJunky

We could "Rate Topic" more often.