Moontanman Posted November 13, 2010 Share Posted November 13, 2010 (edited) Poll Finds Majority Of Male Voters Would Have Elected Naked Woman WASHINGTON—A CNN/Gallup Poll released Monday revealed that a vast majority of registered male voters would have strongly supported a naked woman in the 2010 midterm elections. Respondents also requested a longer, hard-copy version of the poll be sent to their home addresses. The online survey found that regardless of political philosophy or party affiliation, 85 percent of American men in every ethnic, age, and socioeconomic group consistently chose a completely nude woman over a Democratic, Republican, or independent candidate. "Male voters from 18 to 85 were shown pictures of the candidates running in the midterms elections and then a picture of a naked lady," head pollster Gerald Walton said. "Across the board, they favored the naked lady." Edited November 14, 2010 by Cap'n Refsmmat remove NSFW photo - see rule 6 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JohnB Posted November 14, 2010 Share Posted November 14, 2010 Meh. All the poll proves is that male voters from 18 to 85 would rather look at naked women than politicians. Our Prime Minister. (Either the new one or the old one, your choice) Is the poll result really that surprising? Respondents also requested a longer, hard-copy version of the poll be sent to their home addresses. In a plain, brown wrapping please. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pangloss Posted November 14, 2010 Share Posted November 14, 2010 I would have voted for a naked woman for Congress this year for sure. My Congressman's name didn't even appear on my ballot. I couldn't believe they didn't at least give me a write-in space. There really should be a law against that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moontanman Posted November 14, 2010 Author Share Posted November 14, 2010 I be sorry for the boobies CR, but I wonder how many people were distracted by the boobies and only read the title, ignored the satire and took the idea seriously...? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cap'n Refsmmat Posted November 14, 2010 Share Posted November 14, 2010 Heh, yes, when we see boobs there's an incentive to really hope it's true... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JohnB Posted November 15, 2010 Share Posted November 15, 2010 I be sorry for the boobies CR, but I wonder how many people were distracted by the boobies and only read the title, ignored the satire and took the idea seriously...? What's not to take seriously? I'll bet that if Congress was full of naked women a hell of a lot more people would pay attention to what goes on there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mississippichem Posted November 15, 2010 Share Posted November 15, 2010 What's not to take seriously? I'll bet that if Congress was full of naked women a hell of a lot more people would pay attention to what goes on there. C-SPAN's ratings would go through the roof! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Cuthber Posted November 15, 2010 Share Posted November 15, 2010 Ironic to think that there would probably be fewer tits there. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pangloss Posted November 16, 2010 Share Posted November 16, 2010 The only thing I'm annoyed about is that Cap'n didn't move the boobies to the moderator area before taking them down. It's important that all staff members see such things and properly assess them before they are removed from the board completely. I mean, how will I know what to do next time?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now