Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Sayonara

Pseudoscience Overlord

(This is for fun really...)  

1 member has voted

  1. 1. (This is for fun really...)

    • What's the point?
      0
    • Zarkov doesn't work well with boundaries.
      3
    • I'm not fussed. But I'll sign up for the fight.
      2
    • I'm IT or I QUIT!
      0
    • ALL WILL LOVE ME AND DESPAIR!!!!!
      2


Recommended Posts

Why isn't there a mod assigned to this forum?

 

We could have a fight to the death to determine who gets to rule it with an iron fist - winner takes all.

 

In keeping with the theme of the forum all of the following would be allowed in the arena:

  • Magic
  • High technology
  • Knowledge of the future
  • Transdimensional shifting
  • Metamorphosis
  • Unexpected evolution
  • Cannibalism

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Any forums without a moderator are moderated by me and blike.

 

Personally, I don't see why anyone besides Zarkov, or someone who wanted to delete/edit Zarkov's posts, would want to moderate pseudoscience :P

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

MEE!! PICK ME!!!

 

Faf, your humor detector is broken. Please see a shop near you and have it replaced as soon as possible.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Originally posted by blike

Faf, your humor detector is broken.

:haha:

 

And it's not like I didn't announce it at the top of the page either.

 

Go faf go! :P

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I vote for Sayonara, and Blike, and Faf. And anybody else who wants the job. I want it but I'm too old and can't be around consistant. I just like being around. I guess that doesn't help much but that's my job.:zzz: :zzz: :zzz:

Anybody new got a handle on psuedoscience?

Just aman

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Vote? VOTE? What is this, a democracy?!?

 

How can you possibly expect to resolve this without a violent bloodbath?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What's this, mmm, strange ?

 

"I don't see why anyone besides Zarkov, or someone who wanted to delete/edit Zarkov's posts"

 

Well someone likes me!!!

 

:) :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Originally posted by Zarkov

What's this, mmm, strange ?

 

"I don't see why anyone besides Zarkov, or someone who wanted to delete/edit Zarkov's posts"

 

Well someone likes me!!!

 

:) :)

 

he means that only people who would want to moderte or edit your posts would want to moderate pseudoscience.

 

are you sure you speak English?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm Tasmanian Mate, we speak english here. Only trouble is I can't read!!! :)

 

Oh and I forgot, this is my reference !

 

You can't do basic algebra.

You can't spell well.

You don't know basic biology.

 

-These contradict the very way you claim to have arrived at your conclusions.

 

None of your evidence has come from reputable sources.

 

You refuse to address the many flaws I and other have pointed out.

 

You presume all the laws that contradict you are wrong.

 

Your observations are not only taken in the wrong way, some of them are flat out wrong.

 

You refuse to acknowledge all obseravable phenonemons that violate your theories.

 

 

Your theories are WRONG. There's no need to debate this any more.

 

Hope that explains everything :) :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That about covers it. You went a whole week without posting, was I wrong to get my hopes up about you finally realizing your theories were fallacies?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Actually Fafalone, I have a paper at Nature, being considered, that proves all the planets / moons are ejected from the Sun. Cool eh!!!

 

:) :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think I speak for everyone here when I say BULLSHIT. And if it's not bullshit and you actually sent your crap to Nature, you're wasting their time. Why don't you upload your article here? Obviously this so-called article is in ready to publish format, and you know many of the people on this site have access to Nature, so make with the article. E-mail to me or blike, post it in the articles section, or put it in a thread on the boards. This is the point where you stop making excuses for not sharing your work.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Calm down faf, if it gets published, we'll all be eating our shorts. No need to call it bullshit. Its good that he's at least organizing his thoughts into papers.

 

Zarkov, like faf said, if it doesn't get published, put it somewhere where we can read it. :D

 

Take it easy guys.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

To even give the slightest bit of credence to the idea he's actually publishing in Nature is a travesty of intellect.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I can not publish until I am allowed to republish, it Nature accepts it. I can pass on a copy, for appraisal only. I still maintain copyright!!

 

Oh it doesn't take much intellect to stumble onto little diamonds, when you sift through bullshit, sometimes it is amazing what is right under your nose.

 

You just have to learn not to point your nose too high to the sky :) :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Nature should have a website to make all the info available about a month after the magazine comes out. I'm looking forward to it.

Give em hell Zarkov.

Just aman

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Edited reply :-

 

Hello Macmillan Magazines Limited, Nature - Electronic Submissions with Site ID:

1337501 Administrator,

 

A WAM!NET® Internet Gateway package is being delivered to:

Macmillan Magazines Limited, Nature Esubmission (SITEID: 2403601)

 

Tracking ID: 1337501-21555

Job ID: Caley

Client ID: Caley

Job Ticket: Original Submission to Nature

Number Of Files: 1

Size: 17.1KB

 

----------- What follows is the information from the Original Submission to

Nature Job Ticket

 

Submission*:

Category = Astronomy

IntendedFormat = Article

TitleOfSubmission = The Angular momentum of the Solar System is closed.

Angular Velocity of Planetary Orbits Obey a Power Law.

 

FirstParagraph = The total angular momentum of the Universe is conserved.

This is beautifully demonstrated in our own Solar System.

The Angular Momentum of an orbiting body is equal to the Centripetal force

 

= m r w^2 .................(1)

so m r w^2 = K

.................(2)

and therefore r w^2 = K / m

.................(3)

 

= Guniversal (Newton's Gravitational Constant ) .................(4)

 

so for any system with the same central mass

 

rw^2 = Gcentral mass

.................(5)

 

 

Covering Letter:

CoverLetter = This article demonstrates that the planets are in a

2^n order with respect to angular velocity. Newtons Universal Gravitational

Constant is shown to be equivalent to angular momentum.

 

Thank You,

 

WAM!NET® Internet Gateway Notification Agent

**** Please Do Not Respond To This Message ****

 

For Technical assistance, please e-mail support@wamnet.com or

visit http://support.wamnet.com

 

$BANNER_AD

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

And conservation of angular momentum points to the velocity of planets increasing, which would be required to break orbit away from the sun which you claimed?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If you posted it here, you would maintain full copyrights. As per our policy, all article submissions and special cases rights are retained by the author.

On another note... not only that, but believe me when I say we wouldn't even want to take credit for it, if that's what you're thinking.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thats correct Fafalone, the planets must be spiralling out under some force, maybe solar wind, or the initial radial ejection force.

 

I will post it here, but I have to enter into an agreement with Nature, that I give them the copyright!

 

and I can only reproduce it with their permission, which they usually give.

 

The insist of publishing first, then when it's old news I am basically free to do with it as I will, but only with their permission.

 

I don't like this , but if they publish they have a wide readership. It is the way of the world nowdays.

 

:) :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is all very nice but it isn't getting us any closer to the aforementioned bloodbath.

 

ps - let us know if they decide to run the article Zarkov! :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Or the planets could not be spiralling outside their normal orbit... which is what the evidence suggests.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.