I would like to say; If the American Government were happy to fire a Hell Fire Missile at the UAP. They CLEARLY don't believe the UAPs are of Alien origin.

Which leaves with me two options and they are both REALLY strange.

1: They believe they are China or Russian Drones

2: They believe it could be some sort of amphibious undiscovered life like an armoured Box Fish or Super JellyFish

Edit: I missed, this was supposed to be in Speculations. Ooops. Sorry.

2nd Edit: Politics, I'm happy with that.

Edited September 12Sep 12 by HawkII

Moderator Note

Moved from Comments, Suggestions, and Support to Politics.

Thst was touched on in another thread. It would have been a good question to ask during the testimony: why was permission to engage given?

4 hours ago, HawkII said:

I would like to say; If the American Government were happy to fire a Hell Fire Missile at the UAP. They CLEARLY don't believe the UAPs are of Alien origin.

Well, they probably didn't believe THAT UAP was of alien origin. I don't think you can draw any conclusions about other UAPs.

8 hours ago, zapatos said:

Well, they probably didn't believe THAT UAP was of alien origin. I don't think you can draw any conclusions about other UAPs.

Yes, but there are still rules of engagement (or were, at the time of that incident). Typically they must be positively identified as hostile, so the question is what hostile act was witnessed, since the craft was not identified as belonging to a hostile force?

20 hours ago, zapatos said:

Well, they probably didn't believe THAT UAP was of alien origin. I don't think you can draw any conclusions about other UAPs.

Ohhhhhhhhhhhhh; So to the American, only the Super Jelly Fish UAPs are Aliens, but the Armoured BoxFish UAPs are Drones(!) lol

Remember; The Americans believe that some Arab Country has like a Proper Mothership Drone, which they used to spy on them during all the drones flying over their country that time.

Edited September 13Sep 13 by HawkII

2 hours ago, HawkII said:

Ohhhhhhhhhhhhh; So to the American, only the Super Jelly Fish UAPs are Aliens, but the Armoured BoxFish UAPs are Drones(!) lol

Are you feeling okay?

3 hours ago, HawkII said:

Remember; The Americans believe that some Arab Country has like a Proper Mothership Drone, which they used to spy on them during all the drones flying over their country that time.

We do? I never got the memo.

11 hours ago, swansont said:

We do? I never got the memo.

I looked into it and the MotherShip UAP Drone is said to be from Iran.

12 hours ago, zapatos said:

Are you feeling okay?

You are familiar with the JellyFish UAP that most likely turned out to be balloons are you not?

On 9/14/2025 at 2:42 PM, HawkII said:

You are familiar with the JellyFish UAP that most likely turned out to be balloons are you not?

Now that the UAP that got fired at by a Hell FIre missile over Yemen got debunked as a Balloon also, the fact that the USA has never thought of UAPs as Aliens remains true. Truer than ever in fact.

Edited September 24Sep 24 by HawkII

39 minutes ago, HawkII said:

Now that the UAP that got fired at by a Hell FIre missile over Yemen got debunked as a Balloon also, the fact that the USA has never thought of UAPs as Aliens remains true. Truer than ever in fact.

Can you explain to me why it's so important that the USA has ruled out aliens as a possible source for these UAPs? You aren't clear at all, you cite no sources, you quote yourself without adding further clarity, and when you quote others you don't address their responses.

I assume the "Ohhhhhhhhhhhhh" post was implying sarcasm, but you need context for sarcasm to be effective. I don't think anyone knows exactly what you're on about. Why is the USA stance regarding UAPs as non-alien a fact that's never been truer?

On 9/14/2025 at 9:42 AM, HawkII said:

You are familiar with the JellyFish UAP that most likely turned out to be balloons are you not?

Nobody posted an update or link

1 hour ago, Phi for All said:

Can you explain to me why it's so important that the USA has ruled out aliens as a possible source for these UAPs? You aren't clear at all, you cite no sources, you quote yourself without adding further clarity, and when you quote others you don't address their responses.

I assume the "Ohhhhhhhhhhhhh" post was implying sarcasm, but you need context for sarcasm to be effective. I don't think anyone knows exactly what you're on about. Why is the USA stance regarding UAPs as non-alien a fact that's never been truer?

It's not important, it's my thought.

America wouldn't want to start a war with an Alien race.

I quoted myself there because I mentioned Balloons.

I don't respond "Enough" for your liking to quotes.

Edit:- Yes the Ohhhhhhhhhhhhhh is sarcasm, because of the (!)

It's never been truer because of the Debunking YouTube video by the Guy who debunked the UAP to be a Balloon in Yemen.

1 hour ago, swansont said:

Nobody posted an update or link

I assume other peoples YouTube Homepage Algorithm is the same as mine.

Edited September 24Sep 24 by HawkII

7 minutes ago, HawkII said:

America wouldn't want to start a war with an Alien race.

This assumes a great deal. What if America knew the aliens were here for conquest?

Do you mean they wouldn't want to accidentally shoot down a peaceful alien spacecraft? I agree. But I don't understand why the fact that they did shoot means either 1 or 2 from your OP. The drone scenario seems reasonable. The "fish" alternative is a bit bizarre.

It actually seems much more likely that the current US administration would appreciate the distraction that confirmation of alien contact gives them. The Epstein files would fall through the cracks almost immediately if the US could announce contact with extraterrestrials.

It also seems likely that, if they did confirm that the UAPs were extraterrestrial, the current administration might blow them up because they don't want us thinking as a species. They don't want the world to come together in solidarity. There's a lot of history that suggests a common enemy brings together those who don't get along, and that's the last thing the current US administration wants.

25 minutes ago, HawkII said:

I don't respond "Enough" for your liking to quotes.

Only because I like understanding the point others are trying to make when we discuss a subject together.

55 minutes ago, Phi for All said:

The "fish" alternative is a bit bizarre.

A certain brand of car, (I believe off the top of my head, the Box car) was inspired by the Box Fish.

Edited September 24Sep 24 by HawkII

2 hours ago, HawkII said:

I assume other peoples YouTube Homepage Algorithm is the same as mine.

Which assumes we surf youtube.