deleted

Edited April 11, 20241 yr by Genady

Nope, did not work

Edited April 23, 20241 yr by Eise

5 hours ago, Eise said:

Nope, did not work

Post what your trying and we can probably help out

Thanks for your proposal, but working all day with computers, and not too far from my retirement (1.5 year), I discover that learning complete new frameworks is a little bit too much. I am working with databases, and am not too bad at it, and in that cognitive frame I am still capable of learning. But for the one or the other formula in Latex, maybe once per 2 months, I would already have forgotten how I did it. But thanks anyway, very kind of you. 

Best,

Eise

Edited April 23, 20241 yr by Eise

No problem the easiest way I find is to use the command tags \[\frac{1}{2}\.]

I put a dot in the last command to to prevent activation.

For inline ie on the same line use

\(\frac{1}{2}\.)

What's handy about these tags is you don't need to type [\math]  [.\math] [\latex] [.\latex] the inline for these two commands is imath  and ilatex 

Edited April 23, 20241 yr by Mordred

An interesting option is to get hold of a good WYSIWYG editor --there are many--, and generate the LateX code to copy and paste. You only have to worry about the code-wrapping symbols.

On 4/24/2024 at 4:40 AM, joigus said:

An interesting option is to get hold of a good WYSIWYG editor --there are many--, and generate the LateX code to copy and paste. You only have to worry about the code-wrapping symbols.

You also have to worry about whether particular codes are recognised on this site... some aren't. So even if you write something using a LaTeX editor and everything looks fine, some of it may not be recognised when transferred to this site. Thus, it is always a good idea to test something you've not used before in The Sandbox before posting it in a thread for real.

 

Edited April 25, 20241 yr by KJW

4 hours ago, KJW said:

You also have to worry about whether particular codes are recognised on this site... some aren't. So even if you write something using a LaTeX editor and everything looks fine, some of it may not be recognised when transferred to this site. Thus, it is always a good idea to test something you've not used before in The Sandbox before posting it in a thread for real.

 

Of course. Watch out for things like,

\use_package amsmath 1
\use_package amssymb 1
\use_package cancel 1
\use_package esint 1
\use_package mathdots 0
\use_package mathtools 1
\use_package mhchem 1
\use_package stackrel 1
\use_package stmaryrd 1
\use_package undertilde 1

etc on your headers, that some of these editors automatically generate but doesn't 'tell' you about. Good point.

 \.begin{array}{rcl} a&b&c\\a&b&c\\a&b&c\end{array} 

\begin{array}{rcl} a&b&c\\a&b&c\\a&b&c\end{array}  

interesting the \begin{array} self activates

f(z) = \left\{ \.begin{array}{rcl} a&b&c\\a&b&c\\a&b&c\end{array} \right .

\[f(z) = \left\{ \begin{array}{rcl} a&b&c\\a&b&c\\a&b&c\end{array} \right .\]

Edited April 27, 20241 yr by Mordred

[math]\vec{\nu}_e + p^+ \overset{W^+}{\longrightarrow} n^0 + e^+[/math]

[math]\;[/math]
[math]\array{\vec{\nu}_e \searrow && \nearrow n^0 \\ & \overset{W^+}{\leadsto} & \\ p^+ \nearrow && \searrow e^+}[/math]

 

 

Edited April 28, 20241 yr by Orion1

ok

Edited June 8, 20241 yr by Genady

\(a+b\)