Jump to content

Idea for Saudi Arabia and other countries


Skyscrapers

Recommended Posts

People who take care of mosques in Saudi Arabia and other countries where there are mosques use loudspeakers to call for prayer.

The idea of not using loudspeakers to call for prayer, because it was not in the tradition of earlier Muslims, so it is more normal and better without loudspeakers.

I think Christians and Jews don't use loudspeakers, and it's smarter and wiser that way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 9/10/2023 at 6:19 PM, Skyscrapers said:

People who take care of mosques in Saudi Arabia and other countries where there are mosques use loudspeakers to call for prayer.

The idea of not using loudspeakers to call for prayer, because it was not in the tradition of earlier Muslims, so it is more normal and better without loudspeakers.

I think Christians and Jews don't use loudspeakers, and it's smarter and wiser that way.

Christians use church bells, though. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree with the OP. One outstanding feature of Islam, both historically and today, is the undercurrent of compulsion. There is compulsion exercised in Christianity too, but less overt. Historically, Christianity was forced down the throats of people. Today, it's more subtle, but it's still there. And most religions, nearly all, employ compulsion.

But I don't know of any religion that employs as much compulsion as Islam. The the loudspeakers are the most obvious bit of compulsion. You are EXPECTED to pray, not invited. And why do it together? So that everybody can see who's praying, and who's NOT praying. 

Most of the compulsion happens to children, it gets a little bit more subtle as people get older, but it's still there. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The difference is less in the religion, more in what is that nation's form of government.  Anywhere you have a theocracy, you might have loudspeaker or other methods of making the State religion as dominant and all-encompassing as possible.  Nowadays, the most visible theocracies are Islamic so we are more aware of the compulsion there.  There are almost no Christian theocracies left, so we aren't as aware what that would be like.  Mohdi would like India to be more Hindu, so it could happen that he or someone like him in the Right Wing party could push India towards theocracy and try to suppress Islam and other faiths.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, TheVat said:

The difference is less in the religion, more in what is that nation's form of government.  Anywhere you have a theocracy, you might have loudspeaker or other methods of making the State religion as dominant and all-encompassing as possible.  Nowadays, the most visible theocracies are Islamic so we are more aware of the compulsion there.  There are almost no Christian theocracies left, so we aren't as aware what that would be like.  Mohdi would like India to be more Hindu, so it could happen that he or someone like him in the Right Wing party could push India towards theocracy and try to suppress Islam and other faiths.

You could spin it around, it is more that the in democratic countries you are legally protected as part of some variant of freedom of religion and/or expression. I.e. compulsion has to be executed wither hidden or at least not in violation of such laws. There obviously are religious areas where one would be a social outcast if one does not go to a particular church, but there would be legal protection if they forced you to attend (whether that helps, is another matter).

And actually I am not so sure whether one would need a lot of imagination to see what a modern Christian theocracy would look like. The ultraconservative theocratic movements in USA demonstrates what they like to have enshrined by law, for example.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 hours ago, TheVat said:

Mohdi would like India to be more Hindu, so it could happen that he or someone like him in the Right Wing party could push India towards theocracy and try to suppress Islam and other faiths.

Why do you say so?

It is said that Indian Muslims are certainly better off than Muslims in several Muslim countries due to India’s liberal Constitution.

To pay a tribute to Modi's second term ruling, a group of Muslim women dedicated a congratulatory song for PM Modi for bringing the triple talak bill.

Out of 13 highest civilian honours to PM Modi so far, 6 are from Muslim dominated countries.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, DanGonzal said:

Why do you say so?

It is said that Indian Muslims are certainly better off than Muslims in several Muslim countries due to India’s liberal Constitution.

To pay a tribute to Modi's second term ruling, a group of Muslim women dedicated a congratulatory song for PM Modi for bringing the triple talak bill.

Out of 13 highest civilian honours to PM Modi so far, 6 are from Muslim dominated countries.

 

Yes, my scenario is unlikely.  My point was that unexpected shifts can happen when constitutional guard rails are dismantled.  In the West, we see many reports of Modi inflaming anti Muslim sentiment.

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2023/feb/08/narendra-modi-anti-muslim-strongman-global-leader-india-bbc

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.