aman Posted July 17, 2003 Share Posted July 17, 2003 Has anybody got an explanation for the structure of the skull found in Mexico called the Starchild. I read the last DNA tests were inconclusive as to its degree of human traits. It sure looks like a bug eyed ET and the scientific investigations on it seem to be valid, or is it just a big hoax. Just aman Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fafalone Posted July 18, 2003 Share Posted July 18, 2003 Welcome back aman, its been a while Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NSX Posted July 18, 2003 Share Posted July 18, 2003 OH my gosh, that's kind of creepy for me. I guess you checked the official site aman? Well, here's the site: http://www.starchildproject.com/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aman Posted July 18, 2003 Author Share Posted July 18, 2003 It's good to see you all again and I appreciate help since I have to familiarize myself with the new format. I'm glad yer still around Faf, I heard they had all the UM students in jail but I guess they let you back out. Shouldn't all try for those football scholarships. The Starchild skull seems to be legit according to all the elimination of natural causes. I liked the arguments but they are one sided. Where are the project Blue Book people now. In this information age we just might be able to find out enough pieces to put a puzzle together. Is there a medical reason for a skull to be this deformed? Just aman Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skye Posted July 18, 2003 Share Posted July 18, 2003 I'd go with it being a malformed human. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
atinymonkey Posted July 18, 2003 Share Posted July 18, 2003 Yup, elephantiasis seems more pausable than a race that travelled through the stars and forgot to take their head back. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sayonara Posted July 18, 2003 Share Posted July 18, 2003 Having read the forensic DNA report - and Lloyd Pye's response to it - I'm going to go with "human". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skye Posted July 18, 2003 Share Posted July 18, 2003 It's interesting from a medical perspective though. Alot of major structural changes and it lived to 5 or 6. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dudde Posted July 18, 2003 Share Posted July 18, 2003 looks like a human skull to me...a bit deformed mayhap, but it's still human:-p Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
palebluehuh Posted September 5, 2004 Share Posted September 5, 2004 —!!! (pant pant) I almost wet my pants, I was so scared! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mossoi Posted September 5, 2004 Share Posted September 5, 2004 I would say that it's far to similar to a human skull to be anything other than a human skull. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ydoaPs Posted September 6, 2004 Share Posted September 6, 2004 isn't scull warping a common practice in some cultures. i think the cultures that do it are no longer around. many cultures screw up thier bodies. ex1.) chinese bind feet. ex.2) elongation of necks (forgot the name of the tribe. i think it is in africa) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
palebluehuh Posted September 6, 2004 Share Posted September 6, 2004 Firstly, how the heck are you going to warp a skull like that? A bicycle pump? At any rate, the cultures that did skull-warping pressed a baby's head between two boards for a few years to give the head a more enlongated appearance. I think the Inca did that, or at least one of the Mesoamerican peoples. I'm not entirely sure, though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MolecularMan14 Posted September 29, 2004 Share Posted September 29, 2004 No I think that this skull is beyond human interaction (physically warping it), I would say that it's a human with a prominent genetic disorder. An old friend (not really friend, just a fellow student) of mine who now lives in Salt Lake City, had a head much like that of the artist's rendition. He was a creepy little fellow. Large eyes, skinny as anything, long finger, arms, legs and toes. And a triangular head like the one in the drawing. I dunno, I think it would look a little more decisive if a jaw was recovered. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AzurePhoenix Posted September 29, 2004 Share Posted September 29, 2004 Probably nothing more than some genetic oddity passed on by father to child for several generations, but puttered out and never surfaced in recorded history. One time genetic mutation that went extinct. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
psychicstar7 Posted May 25, 2012 Share Posted May 25, 2012 (edited) this is a hoax. until today there is nor real evidence of aliens on earth including Area 5 where they suppose to have a dead body on an aliens. if aliens visit us everyday they are doing great job in keep it quiet. you can read more here: (no you can't, because a moderator removed the link - our forum is no place to advertise your own websites) Edited May 25, 2012 by CaptainPanic link removed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
richw9090 Posted May 28, 2012 Share Posted May 28, 2012 The StarChild Skull was a hoax when it first showed up, and it is still a hoax. Or, more accurately, it is simply a child's skull from an archeological site. There is nothing unusual or out of the ordinary about it. It is being hyped, but it is nothing. Rich Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now