Jump to content

New Theory


Recommended Posts

Hello! I'm new here and I just wanted to try and show my theory to everyone so I could get some opinions and maybe some advice. Thank You 🙏

The Universe is 4 Dimensional, an entity existing in Space-Time flows through Time, then in Space. The delay existing in the movement of an electron for 1 second is 6.93907x10^-7 s . A body existing in 3d space is in a state of everywhere and nowhere meaning that it has no particular coordinates. When approaching great speeds, the delay in the movements gets bigger and more significant. The speed of Light is a limit for every body that has a noticeable mass. Information entering a 3d space only is lost.

152975209_ScreenShot2020-12-10at19_36_17.png.745b2431008ad7bf88918161902b8715.png with Ekr: Relative Kinetic Energy; Etr: Relative Total Energy; Δt: Duration of the movement; γm: representing the max “Possible” speed, γm = 38.75.1131631235_ScreenShot2020-12-10at19_31_47.thumb.png.2642c5af7f7f217f4947520c877ad939.pngAgain Thank You🙏

Link to post
Share on other sites

A rather confusing explanation for an equation that plays with numbers.
For example , what does "an entity existing in Space-Time flows through Time, then in Space" mean ?
Any event in space-time will 'move' along the time axis, whether it is in motion in space, or not.

What is this so-called theory meant to explain ?
What does it predict ?
How does it differ from current accepted theories ?
What observations lead you to believe this is in any way relevant?
Does this reduce to SR, which has been tested, and found accurate, many times ?

Link to post
Share on other sites
56 minutes ago, enoemoSJ said:

 The delay existing in the movement of an electron for 1 second is 6.93907x10^-7 s .

What movement? Why is there a delay? Under what circumstances? Is this a delay before it starts to move?

56 minutes ago, enoemoSJ said:

A body existing in 3d space is in a state of everywhere and nowhere meaning that it has no particular coordinates. When approaching great speeds, the delay in the movements gets bigger and more significant. The speed of Light is a limit for every body that has a noticeable mass. Information entering a 3d space only is lost.

152975209_ScreenShot2020-12-10at19_36_17.png.745b2431008ad7bf88918161902b8715.png with Ekr: Relative Kinetic Energy; Etr: Relative Total Energy; Δt: Duration of the movement; γm: representing the max “Possible” speed, γm = 38.75.1131631235_ScreenShot2020-12-10at19_31_47.thumb.png.2642c5af7f7f217f4947520c877ad939.pngAgain Thank You🙏

Why is 38.75 the max possible speed? What does γm represent?

Link to post
Share on other sites

When a body moves, it move through time first then through space so there’s delay.

it’s like movement throught time - delay - movement through space

the γm is for v= 2.99x10^16

1 hour ago, swansont said:

What movement? Why is there a delay? Under what circumstances? Is this a delay before it starts to move?

Why is 38.75 the max possible speed? What does γm represent?

 

1 hour ago, ALine said:

@enoemoSJ

there is a thread by swansont in speculation about new theories. Check it out, gives some good details on how to format and define your idea.

Will do Thanks 🙏🏻 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The three space dimensions and the time dimension are orthogonal dimensions on a 4D space-time co-ordinate system.
IOW, space and time are inextricably linked.

What is the geometry that allows for movement through time, and a 'delay' before movement through space ?
How do you account for this separation ?
Where is the evidence and implications of this delay/separation ?

Again what does your equation attempt to explain, and, is there a need for such an explanation ???

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, enoemoSJ said:

When a body moves, it move through time first then through space so there’s delay.

it’s like movement throught time - delay - movement through space

the γm is for v= 2.99x10^16

That’s ~100 million times the speed of light (assuming m/s), so I assume it’s a typo.

Can you show how you arrived at this? You should do this in general. Even though it’s clear what speed you chose for your example, you should have stated it.

Also: units. Use them.

 

How does one test your conjecture? How does the electron “know” what t is going to be, to determine its delay?

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
21 minutes ago, swansont said:

That’s ~100 million times the speed of light (assuming m/s), so I assume it’s a typo.

Can you show how you arrived at this? You should do this in general. Even though it’s clear what speed you chose for your example, you should have stated it.

Also: units. Use them.

 

How does one test your conjecture? How does the electron “know” what t is going to be, to determine its delay?

 

Yes it is, I meant 2.99x10^8 m/s I used it as the max speed because it’s not quite the value of c nor the value of a limit(3-) but it could be considered as a limit. As for testing I don’t really know.

Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, enoemoSJ said:

Yes it is, I meant 2.99x10^8 m/s I used it as the max speed because it’s not quite the value of c nor the value of a limit(3-) but it could be considered as a limit. As for testing I don’t really know.

So where does 38.75 come from? 

How does the electron “know” what the duration of motion is going to be, before it moves, in order to determine its delay?

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, MigL said:

The three space dimensions and the time dimension are orthogonal dimensions on a 4D space-time co-ordinate system.
IOW, space and time are inextricably linked.

What is the geometry that allows for movement through time, and a 'delay' before movement through space ?
How do you account for this separation ?
Where is the evidence and implications of this delay/separation ?

Again what does your equation attempt to explain, and, is there a need for such an explanation ???

I consider the Time Dimension as a coordinate system for space itself , it’s like it is solidifying the body’s position before it  is even moving through space. My equation attempts to explain that when a body reaches higher speed and gets close to c, that delay will get bigger to a point of ∞; and at that point it is in a state where it’s scattered across space and it’s nowhere at the same time. The need for such an explanation would be that in a black hole, because of the intensive speed and mass, a body entering will be teared down and lost. 

1 minute ago, swansont said:

So where does 38.75 come from? 

How does the electron “know” what the duration of motion is going to be, before it moves, in order to determine its delay?

38.75 comes from using 2.999x10^8 in Lorentz Factor.

The electron doesn’t know, we would determine a duration to study the delay of that electron, I mainly attached the equation just as an evidence demonstrating that a body moves through Time first, solidifying it’s position before even getting there.

The speculation isn’t quite final, I am constantly developing it. But I posted it just to see if the idea of it is good or not.

Link to post
Share on other sites
26 minutes ago, enoemoSJ said:

 

38.75 comes from using 2.999x10^8 in Lorentz Factor.

Why would you do that? Since c= 299792458 m/s, how you get this value? Please show your work.

 

26 minutes ago, enoemoSJ said:

The electron doesn’t know, we would determine a duration to study the delay of that electron, I mainly attached the equation just as an evidence demonstrating that a body moves through Time first, solidifying it’s position before even getting there.

How can you satisfy causality if the delay depends on the trip duration, which can only be determined after the trip is complete?

26 minutes ago, enoemoSJ said:

The speculation isn’t quite final, I am constantly developing it. But I posted it just to see if the idea of it is good or not.

No, it’s not. You have no basis for it, and it violates physical law. Speculation is not supposed to be fiction.

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, enoemoSJ said:

I consider the Time Dimension as a coordinate system for space itself 

Ahhh, a co-ordinate system for a co-ordinate system.
How redundant.

2 hours ago, enoemoSJ said:

it’s like it is solidifying the body’s position before it  is even moving through space

I didn't realize bodies were immaterial when not moving.

2 hours ago, enoemoSJ said:

The need for such an explanation would be that in a black hole, because of the intensive speed and mass, a body entering will be teared down and lost. 

You can pass through the event horizon of a large Black Hole without being torn apart because tidal forces are small. We don't know what happens at the possible singularity, or even if there is one, as our theories are no longer applicable. But nowhere, not even inside the event horizon, is light speed equalled or exceeded by massive bodies.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 2 months later...

I'd have to look for the source, but I thought that had already been verified for gravity 'leaking' into compactified' extra spatial dimensions ( at small scales ).

The above ( always ) excellent PBS video provides Gravitational wave evidence for the absence of extra large scale spatial dimensions.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.