Jump to content
anne242

proven maths/science ends in meaninglessness/contradiction

Recommended Posts

It is proven maths/science ends in meaninglessness/contradiction:

Magister colin leslie dean the only modern Renaissance man with 9 degrees including 4 masters: B,Sc, BA, B.Litt(Hons), MA, B.Litt(Hons), MA, MA (Psychoanalytic studies), Master of Psychoanalytic studies, Grad Cert (Literary studies) : who proved Godels theorems to be invalid

He is also Australia's leading erotic poet

and showed science/mathematics ends in meaninglessness

1)Mathematics/science ends in contradiction:an integer=a non-integer

Mathematics ends in contradiction:6 examples

2) the theory of evolution ends in meaninglessness

3) biology is not a sciencE

3) biologists dont know what a species is-thus theory of evolution is nonsense

all very simple and clear

the facts are

1) 1 is a finite number it stops

A finite decimal is one that stops, like 0.157

A non-finite decimal like 0.888... does not stop

A non-finite decimal like 0.999... does not stop

when a finite number 1 = a non-finite number 0.999.. then maths ends in contradiction

another way

1 is an integer a whole number

0.888... is a non-integer it is not a whole number

0.999... is a non-integer not a whole number

when a integer 1 =a non-integer 0.999... maths ends in contradiction

2)1)Darwins book is called On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection ....

but

this paper shows natural selection is not the origin of new species Natural selection is not the origin of new species

Natural selection does not generate new genes/species Natural selection adds no new genetic information as it only deals with the passing on of genes/traits already present and it will be pointed out genetics cannot account for

the generation of new species/genes as it is claimed the generation of new genes [via mutation] is a random process due to radiation, viruses, chemicals etc and genetic cannot account for these process happening as they are out side the scope of genetics physics, chaos theory etc may give some explanation but genetics cant

2) Biologist cant tell us what a species is -without contradiction thus evolution theory ie evolving species is nonsense

Biologists agree there is species hybridization

but that contradicts what a species is

3) biologist tell us they investigate life

but

they cant tell us what life is-they can tell us what life does but cant tell us what life is they cant even give a definition of life that is not nonsense

Edited by Strange
Spam links deleted

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
29 minutes ago, anne242 said:

1) 1 is a finite number it stops

Normal people call it "natural number"..

 

29 minutes ago, anne242 said:

A non-finite decimal like 0.888... does not stop

A non-finite decimal like 0.999... does not stop

Again, normal people call them "irrational number" and "rational number"..

 

29 minutes ago, anne242 said:

It is proven maths/science ends in meaninglessness/contradiction:

...you don't even know worldwide terminology used in mathematics, which is taught in primary school..

29 minutes ago, anne242 said:

2) the theory of evolution ends in meaninglessness

Nonsense.

29 minutes ago, anne242 said:

they cant even give a definition of life that is not nonsense

...you post is nonsense..

 

Edited by Sensei

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
34 minutes ago, anne242 said:

He is also Australia's leading erotic poet

Perhaps he should stick to that role.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
26 minutes ago, anne242 said:

It is proven maths/science ends in meaninglessness/contradiction

Can you provide some source other than a list of links to one specific publisher? Does some mainstream scientists agree with the ideas of Colin Leslie Dean?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
!

Moderator Note

You don't get to "hide" in the Philosophy section with a thread like this. I've moved you to Speculations. If you want the thread to remain open, support your arguments with mainstream science. Your circular support system isn't going to work here. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.

 
!

Moderator Note

And checking past posts, I'm reminded you've tried this before and failed. This attempt holds nothing new.

Don't bring this up again. You've been told why it's wrong, so you obviously aren't using mainstream science to remove your ignorance about mainstream science, so inevitably, your arguments will fail. Please learn the things you don't know that are holding you back.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.