Johnathon Zimmerman Cold Fusion theory

[JohnathonZimmerman21]

Okay so to begin here is a paragraph about superposition. Superposition is the combination of two waves at the same location. Constructive interference occurs when two identical waves are superimposed in phase. Destructive interferenceoccurs when two identical waves are superimposed exactly out of phase. ... An antinode is the location of maximum amplitude of a standing wave.

Next is a paragraph about a bose einstein condensate. Bose-Einstein condensate (BEC), a state of matter in which separate atoms or subatomic particles, cooled to near absolute zero (0 K, − 273.15 °C, or − 459.67 °F; K = kelvin), coalesce into a single quantum mechanical entity—that is, one that can be described by a wave function—on a near-macroscopic scale.

The point of this being a single wave function of many atoms and a single collapse.

The next piece to a puzzle is a Fermonic Condensate. A wiki piece here: A fermionic condensate is a superfluid phase formed by fermionic particles at low temperatures. It is closely related to the Bose–Einstein condensate, a superfluid phase formed by bosonic atoms under similar conditions.

To my understanding this is the single wave function as well.

The point of these two is the intention to have the ability to create various symmetrical inference patterns. 

After extensive research I found that it's possible to change the percent of tunneling in a BCE by altering the inneratomic relationship, and shape to hold all parts of the wave function/particle/whatever into the phase of quantum tunneling. The research of this percentage change possibility being called a Bosonic Josephson Junction.

So the struggle is in the uncertainty principle. My question earlier was;
Is there any quantum tunneling of a proton in any form near absolute zero?



Paul Camp, Ph. D. in theoretical physics and 30 years experience

Answered 1h ago

You mean absolute zero temperature?

Yes. The closer you get to zero, the less energy and momentum in a system so the less uncertainty in momentum so the greater uncertainty in position.

-----------

In this case there is certainly one thing about the experiment. Symmetry. In principle the position is known to hold proper proportions to a number of different reactions according the inference patterns. Two waves in motion causing different superpositions. This will cause a singular fusion reaction in accordance to the initial mass. It is then to be assumed that this energy should be used as the start up for the Ignite/Ignition portion of nuclear fusion. This can also be called an Inital Mass Bomb in the sense of destruction. The cold and condensates being destroyed in the reaction. Just implying the singular moment again as because of the collapse.

Initial mass * percentage of tunneling = Energy

What do you all think :)?

[swansont]

11 hours ago, JohnathonZimmerman21 said:

Okay so to begin here is a paragraph about superposition. Superposition is the combination of two waves at the same location. Constructive interference occurs when two identical waves are superimposed in phase. Destructive interferenceoccurs when two identical waves are superimposed exactly out of phase. ... An antinode is the location of maximum amplitude of a standing wave.

Next is a paragraph about a bose einstein condensate. Bose-Einstein condensate (BEC), a state of matter in which separate atoms or subatomic particles, cooled to near absolute zero (0 K, − 273.15 °C, or − 459.67 °F; K = kelvin), coalesce into a single quantum mechanical entity—that is, one that can be described by a wave function—on a near-macroscopic scale.

The point of this being a single wave function of many atoms and a single collapse.

The next piece to a puzzle is a Fermonic Condensate. A wiki piece here: A fermionic condensate is a superfluid phase formed by fermionic particles at low temperatures. It is closely related to the Bose–Einstein condensate, a superfluid phase formed by bosonic atoms under similar conditions.

To my understanding this is the single wave function as well.

Not so fast.

A BEC has most/all of its atoms in the ground state of a potential well. A single quantum state. This can't happen with fermions — they can't be in the same state. A fermionic condensate has each of its energy levels occupied, starting with the lowest state, with each state occupied by the allowable spin projections (if it's spin 1/2, then you have on that's spin up and one that's spin down)

Now you can write down a global wave function that the combination of individual particle wave functions. Which means it's nothing special to have an ensemble of atoms and say that they are described by a single wave function. But that's not what is meant in the case of a BEC. In a BEC, the particles are all described by the same wave function. That's a different statement, and not true of a fermionic system.

 

 

[JohnathonZimmerman21]

As far as I'm aware they discovered how to do that to Fermions in 2004. Not moving too fast it's just a new state of matter sense 2004. I can't find much information on it.

That's why it's a Fermonic condensate 

[swansont]

I was thinking of a fermi gas, the state before the Cooper pairs are formed. Apologies.

[JohnathonZimmerman21]

I really did take what you said to heart and I just started doing a little more research on YouTube in this case in which explained that the Fermonic condensate does move in a symmetrical unified way. Not sure if it's as one or two yet. A picture showed two circles with blues and reds like heat, but as long as symmetry is available the idea should work.

[Strange]

3 hours ago, JohnathonZimmerman21 said:

I really did take what you said to heart and I just started doing a little more research on YouTube

I would suggest using a proper source of information. 

[JohnathonZimmerman21]

27 minutes ago, Strange said:

I would suggest using a proper source of information. 

One source says one wave, another says two. I really do need better sources for more information which is why I am sticking my neck out at forums like this.

[MigL]

A 'fermionic' condensate is merely paired-up fermions such that they act like bosons.
And once they act like bosons, and obey Bose-Einstein statistics, shouldn't the state be called a Bose-Einstein condensate where the individual component particles are composite.
The naming ( fermionic condensate ) is misleading, since fermions obey Fermi-Dirac statistics, and by definition, cannot occupy the same state.

[JohnathonZimmerman21]

27 minutes ago, MigL said:

A 'fermionic' condensate is merely paired-up fermions such that they act like bosons.
And once they act like bosons, and obey Bose-Einstein statistics, shouldn't the state be called a Bose-Einstein condensate where the individual component particles are composite.
The naming ( fermionic condensate ) is misleading, since fermions obey Fermi-Dirac statistics, and by definition, cannot occupy the same state.

So in understanding they do act like a BCE? 

[Strange]

7 hours ago, JohnathonZimmerman21 said:

One source says one wave, another says two. I really do need better sources for more information which is why I am sticking my neck out at forums like this.

There are lots of online resources for studying physics (as opposed to watching youtube videos, which will not really teach you anything). And then you can come to a forum like this and ask questions about the bits you are not clear about. Starting off by trying to propose a "theory" based on limited knowledge is likely to antagonise some people.