blike Posted August 1, 2005 Share Posted August 1, 2005 Should we reinstall openscience? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cap'n Refsmmat Posted August 1, 2005 Share Posted August 1, 2005 Yes. Except this time, let's do it right and get the entire community in on it. More publicity! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
In My Memory Posted August 1, 2005 Share Posted August 1, 2005 What is OpenScience? Is it a science wiki? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cap'n Refsmmat Posted August 1, 2005 Share Posted August 1, 2005 You got it rather quick. That's what it is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blike Posted August 1, 2005 Author Share Posted August 1, 2005 Any suggestions on the name? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted August 1, 2005 Share Posted August 1, 2005 I'm all for it. Sounds like a really good plan Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cap'n Refsmmat Posted August 1, 2005 Share Posted August 1, 2005 I like Aeternus's name idea: WiSci. I say go for it. I'll see if I can get my own wiki software finished up enough to use. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skye Posted August 1, 2005 Share Posted August 1, 2005 Any suggestions on the name? Blikey J's Conflabulous EnSciclopedia. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted August 1, 2005 Share Posted August 1, 2005 Dot com. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MetaFrizzics Posted August 1, 2005 Share Posted August 1, 2005 wow this sounds really good: Tell me about the previous attempt. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ydoaPs Posted August 1, 2005 Share Posted August 1, 2005 people didn't use it and it died, iirc Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cap'n Refsmmat Posted August 1, 2005 Share Posted August 1, 2005 No, people did use it, but blike's host killed it for some reason or another. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ydoaPs Posted August 1, 2005 Share Posted August 1, 2005 if i wasn't hungry, i would have voted yes Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cap'n Refsmmat Posted August 1, 2005 Share Posted August 1, 2005 Blike, if you'd like to test out my wiki, you can find a beta at http://www.homeworkrocket.com/awiki/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bettina Posted August 1, 2005 Share Posted August 1, 2005 Blikey J's Conflabulous EnSciclopedia. I love it......perfect. Bettina Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sayonara Posted August 2, 2005 Share Posted August 2, 2005 I feel it reinvents the wheel somewhat. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blike Posted August 2, 2005 Author Share Posted August 2, 2005 good point Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cap'n Refsmmat Posted August 3, 2005 Share Posted August 3, 2005 blike: http://sourceforge.net/projects/sc-wiki/ It's been redubbed scWiki. Hope you like the software. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sayonara Posted August 4, 2005 Share Posted August 4, 2005 Writing Wiki software is reinventing the wheel too Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YT2095 Posted August 4, 2005 Share Posted August 4, 2005 couldn`t the Search Engine be modified in such a way that if you needed a definition you could just type something like: DEF "aword" and would open a box with the meaning in it? just a thought. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cap'n Refsmmat Posted September 25, 2005 Share Posted September 25, 2005 Out of curiosity, I'd like to ask if Blike is still interested or if he forgot about it. I think a wiki would be great for SFN. We could refer people to the wiki articles for commonly asked questions (and maintain a list of creationist arguments and rebuttals) and so on. Also it would be fun. As for YT's question, I think that would be simple, although that would require a seperate listing of words and articles. There might be arguments over what's a word and what deserves an article. It would be easier to just do articles. I've finished 1.0 of scWiki, in case you'd like to use that. Since I have enough time on my hands, if you'd like a feature, I can probably add it. (Nothing too extravagant though!) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ecoli Posted September 25, 2005 Share Posted September 25, 2005 very nice Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now