Jump to content

Are we loosing earths magnetic shield?


paul.g.griffiths

Recommended Posts

 

Can you not see? The lines that intersect our world in your graphic are longer at the poles, therefore the energy contained in those lines are more spread out and therefore the heat is less concentrated.

 

Spread out heat less concentration? More like thicker the atmosphere cooller it gets going through.

You could say carbon monoxide is warming the planet, so longer lines means more warming.

 

Pole: Was frozen at something like -30. Now melting so someẃhere around 0. Difference of 30 degrees. So 15 degrees change per "thickness at equator"(Double line distance)

 

Equator Say 38 degrees. Global warming is only about 1 degrees.

Anyone care to explain?

 

At top of atmosphere its 1000's degrees and by the time it reaches the equator surface it's about 40 degrees.

If the difference in temperature is 1000's degrees. Then if the line distance is double then why not continue getting colder at is the poles of 1000's of degrees below freezing?

 

This is becoming more confusing.

 

Theres overall temperature to take into consideration.

And water freezes at exactly 0 and below.

Edited by paul.g.griffiths
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Spread out heat less concentration? More like thicker the atmosphere cooller it gets going through.

 

 

Why not calculate the relative effects of the thicker atmosphere and the fact that the energy is spread out over a larger area. Then you can see for yourself which is more significant.

 

 

 

You could say carbon monoxide is warming the planet

 

You could. But that would be insane.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.