"On a large enough scale, our position is but a wave of probability that never lingers beyond the fractal pattern of relativity."

 

Mark Clayton Beal

"On a large enough scale, our position is but a wave of probability that never lingers beyond the fractal pattern of relativity."

 

Mark Clayton Beal

 

Nevertheless, I'm here.

Mark Clayton Beal

 

 

Who?

 

"Wherever I hang my hat, that's my home"

 

Marvin Gaye

!

Moderator Note

This is a discussion forum, not a blog. What is it you wish to discuss?

That relativity is natures fractal pattern, and that the wave of probability for quantum particles applies to all things within an equal scale.

and that sub-atomic particles cannot exist everywhere at once, but they must maintain their position within realities infinitely repeating natural fractal.

If today's thought experiments turn up correct, we should be able to digitize points within the wave of probability, explain the double slit experiment, advance quantum computing, expand our perception of reality, and bring a better understanding of the quantum field.

That relativity is natures fractal pattern, and that the wave of probability for quantum particles applies to all things within an equal scale.

 

 

Evidence?

 

And who is Mark Clayton Beal?

 

 

explain the double slit experiment

 

We already have an explanation for that.

!

Moderator Note

 

Moved to speculations.

Please provide your new formula which correctly predicts fringe patterns with regards to the slit separation and wavelength of incident light

 

"On a large enough scale, our position is but a wave of probability that never lingers beyond the fractal pattern of relativity."

 

Mark Clayton Beal

On a large scale you should be calling through that chair you're sitting in, given the fact that each of the gazillion atoms that combine to comprises it are 99% empty space.

 

Yet...You sit.

 

Just as. Yet....We are, in all probability...Pardon the pun..Still here.

That relativity is natures fractal pattern, and that the wave of probability for quantum particles applies to all things within an equal scale.

.

The deBroglie formula shows that to be false. Do you noticebly diffract when you walk through a doorway?

Double slit:

 

The understanding of my thought experiment to date:

It is complicated to put into words.

 

1) An instant of time (relevant to our frequency or perception) is one loop of the fractal formula z=zsquare+c. The universe is expanding one frame at a time according to this formula.

 

2) Infinite particles represent points on the geometric plane(s)

 

3) atomic protons represent one loop of expansion. They step from one frame to the next, this defines their position in 4d space. They are relevant to a single plane of the fractal geometry.

 

4) captured electrons represent 6 loops of expansion, their relevance can exist in several points within these 6 steps of expansion.

 

still speculating,

Double slit:

 

The understanding of my thought experiment to date:

It is complicated to put into words.

 

Then why not try maths?

still speculating,

 

 

Still making up incoherent nonsense.

!

Moderator Note

 

Still not providing the equation (or at least an attempt at formalisation) I am pretty sure I made a requirement for this thread to stay open. Final chance

 

 

Nevertheless, I'm here.

 

I can't see you and I'm definitely here.

Edited April 13, 20178 yr by Manticore