tkadm30 Posted January 2, 2017 Share Posted January 2, 2017 I have hardly observed any clandestine geoengineering activity (chemtrails) since Trump has been elected. I think this could be a big victory for us if the US administration is putting an end to unilateral climate engineering. The disinformation about climate changes is geopolitical manipulation of climatic data by artificially generating weather (atmospheric) abnormalities. -4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CharonY Posted January 2, 2017 Share Posted January 2, 2017 I have hardly observed any clandestine geoengineering activity (chemtrails) since Trump has been elected. I think this could be a big victory for us if the US administration is putting an end to unilateral climate engineering. The disinformation about climate changes is geopolitical manipulation of climatic data by artificially generating weather (atmospheric) abnormalities. On the other hand I noticed an uptick of the actions by the lizard people. Maybe it is part of the preparation against the incoming uprising of the cenobites rather than due to the presidential election? 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Strange Posted January 2, 2017 Share Posted January 2, 2017 I have hardly observed any clandestine geoengineering activity (chemtrails) since Trump has been elected. There is no such thing as "chemtrails". It is a conspiracy theory held by the deluded and insane. The disinformation about climate changes is geopolitical manipulation of climatic data by artificially generating weather (atmospheric) abnormalities. And somehow the world's climate scientists have missed this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tkadm30 Posted January 2, 2017 Author Share Posted January 2, 2017 (edited) There is no such thing as "chemtrails". It is a conspiracy theory held by the deluded and insane. And somehow the world's climate scientists have missed this. I disagree. The "conspiracy theory" label is significant for disinformation purposes only. You can interpret this the way you want, but the globalization of climatic data is subject to solar radiation management (SRM) policies. Edited January 2, 2017 by tkadm30 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Strange Posted January 2, 2017 Share Posted January 2, 2017 You can interpret this the way you want, but the globalization of climatic data is subject to solar radiation management (SRM) policies. Please provide some evidence of this global conspiracy to control the climate using "chemtrails". (Based on the previous difficulty of squeezing evidence out of you, I won't hold my breath.) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tkadm30 Posted January 2, 2017 Author Share Posted January 2, 2017 Please provide some evidence of this global conspiracy to control the climate using "chemtrails". The systemic disinformation is evidence of a global initiative to manipulate climatic data using geoengineering. -1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Strange Posted January 2, 2017 Share Posted January 2, 2017 The systemic disinformation is evidence of a global initiative to manipulate climatic data using geoengineering. Please provide evidence of this "systemic disinformation". (You are dangerously close to the argument that "the fact there is no evidence just shows how powerful the conspiracy is".) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ten oz Posted January 2, 2017 Share Posted January 2, 2017 I have hardly observed any clandestine geoengineering activity (chemtrails) since Trump has been elected. I think this could be a big victory for us if the US administration is putting an end to unilateral climate engineering. The disinformation about climate changes is geopolitical manipulation of climatic data by artificially generating weather (atmospheric) abnormalities. Jet Turbines compresses air which is then exposed to a flame (burning jet fuel), the resulting combustion causes a rapid expansion as the exhaust exits the turbine which used as thrust. At altitude the air is very cold. The turbine exhaust is very hot air of a higher moisture concentration than the surrounding air and rapidly cools which creates a crystalized trail of water vapor. That is it. Every jet is the sky doesn't have trails because they all fly are various altitudes. A jet needs to be at high altitude where the air is very cold and vapor levels are low to produce trails. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tkadm30 Posted January 2, 2017 Author Share Posted January 2, 2017 Please provide evidence of this "systemic disinformation". (You are dangerously close to the argument that "the fact there is no evidence just shows how powerful the conspiracy is".) Systemic disinformation on the Internet about clandestine geoengineering activity is an evidence of cognitive infiltration on the science of geoengineering. A contrail is not visibly observable and does not persist or condense to create clouds. Propaganda (cognitive brainwashing) about geoengineering existence is observable on forums like this one. My impressions is that the corruption of global climatic data may manipulate the true implications of climate change: The unilateral modification of the weather with aerosolized nanoparticles with potential consequences for human health is poorly understood aspect of geoengineering. -1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Strange Posted January 2, 2017 Share Posted January 2, 2017 Systemic disinformation on the Internet about clandestine geoengineering activity is an evidence of cognitive infiltration on the science of geoengineering. A contrail is not visibly observable and does not persist or condense to create clouds. Propaganda (cognitive brainwashing) about geoengineering existence is observable on forums like this one. My impressions is that the corruption of global climatic data may manipulate the true implications of climate change: The unilateral modification of the weather with aerosolized nanoparticles with potential consequences for human health is poorly understood aspect of geoengineering. The only disinformation on the internet is the sort of deluded nonsense you seem to have fallen for. As you have no evidence, we can safely ignore you. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tkadm30 Posted January 2, 2017 Author Share Posted January 2, 2017 Sure. I admire anti-chemtrails activists who find themselves happy in believing the sky is blue. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Strange Posted January 2, 2017 Share Posted January 2, 2017 Sure. I admire anti-chemtrails activists who find themselves happy in believing the sky is blue. You admire people who believe in something that doesn't exist. A religion substitute, perhaps. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Delta1212 Posted January 2, 2017 Share Posted January 2, 2017 Sure. I admire anti-chemtrails activists who find themselves happy in believing the sky is blue. I... what? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tkadm30 Posted January 2, 2017 Author Share Posted January 2, 2017 (edited) Strange, You speak nonsense my friend... Geoengineering was easily observable until Trump got elected... bubye!! Edited January 2, 2017 by tkadm30 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Strange Posted January 2, 2017 Share Posted January 2, 2017 You speak nonsense my friend... Geoengineering was easily observable until Trump got elected... Then it should be easy for you to present some evidence. But you won't because it only exists in your imagination. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tkadm30 Posted January 2, 2017 Author Share Posted January 2, 2017 Strange, The scientific radicalisation of geoengineering use deception and ignorance to discourage scientific research: Your comments are both deceptive and misinformed about the observability of chemtrails. The bioeffects of aerosolized nanoparticles on human health is controversial and poorly understood: You clearly do not know what you speak about if you have no concerns for the biological effects and safety of engineered nanoparticles exposure. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
swansont Posted January 2, 2017 Share Posted January 2, 2017 ! Moderator Note Nope nope nope nope. We will not discuss classified government projects on this site. Besides, you're ignoring invisible chemtrails, and the q-rays that emanate from them (They can penetrate tinfoil hats. I'm putting my life at risk to tell you this) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts