iNow

Not everyone who wanted to was affluent enough to even have this as an option...

One is passive and lets them continue on unabated and without pressure or influence while the other is active and seeks to halt all activities and remove them from existence entirely

I get the very real sense that he only drinks Two Buck Chuck and NyQuil.

They're not mutually exclusive in this regard. See also: Busch Light, Natty Light, and other similar AB InBev franken-stein fillers.

The clear issue here is the mistake you've made by calling Coors Light a "beer." It's better referred to as beer adjacent swill water. /BeerNerdShade

That’s a helpful insight

You misspelled inspired. ✌️ Just musing…

You know how sometimes we find shapes when looking upward into the clouds and those shapes tend to anchor around and get derived from whatever idea just happened to be percolating around in our heads that day? How maybe we had an encounter with a cat that morning, so see one (or a dog) now when glancing skyward? Well, for some of us, thoughts of violent insurrection and threats of extermination are being encountered far more frequently now and… like the encounter with a cat cited above… that becomes what we see upon looking into those same clouds (storm clouds?). Our minds are primed to find it. My point is really just that we all give our own meanings to words and exchanges all of the time. It’s also uncommon… even here at SFN… when the word “anarchy” comes up to then have to clarify to which subtype of anarchy we’re referring, but certainly not unwelcome. Hard to measure, but one proposed benefit of ranked choice / preferential voting is that it alters candidate behavior. Good for voters who don’t feel like they’re wasting their vote and can vote their heart, but also good for which candidates get elevated, namely more moderate ones. Politicians all certainly want to be everyone voters First choice, but to be someone’s 2nd or even 3rd choice requires that candidate not be too extreme nor too far outside of the mainstream. This approach to voting tends to make more moderate candidates more likely to breakaway from the pack and ultimately to win by simply appealing to a larger portion of the population (as well they should in any system audacious enough to wave Democracy as it’s banner). Suspect you already knew this, but perhaps others reading didn’t and I enjoyed sharing it so thanks for the springboard either way.

More like shooting at old soda bottles on a stump

Agreed

Potato

If you did, then we can add liar to the list of valid descriptors of you (alongside time wasting asshat).

You misspelled delusion again.

Look. Here’s a picture of a refrigerator. I solved global warming!

Once more, you keep misspelling delusional

What possible answer to this question wouldn't equally apply to any other claim of existence about anything whatsoever?

It's still different.

Nuh-uh! Yeah-huh! Nuh-uh! Yeah-huh! Lather. Rinse. Repeat.

All the same. You're likely just a badly programmed bot. Your other threads here and here suffer the same problem. A waste of bandwidth. This isn't news, isn't interesting, isn't precisely correct, and also isn't a great way to start a thread. What, exactly, do you wish to discuss? As it stands, your OP looks like graffiti.

I'm noticing a trend here, so will repeat my comment from your other "thread." This isn't news, isn't interesting, isn't precisely correct, and also isn't a great way to start a thread. What, exactly, do you wish to discuss? As it stands, your OP looks like graffiti.

This isn't news, isn't interesting, isn't precisely correct, and also isn't a great way to start a thread. What, exactly, do you wish to discuss? As it stands, your OP looks like graffiti.

May I humbly request that next time you use crayons, you know... so the content of your diagram more closely aligns with the media used to create it?

How is it different this time from when you said it 7 hours ago? You have what’s known in the biz as a credibility problem.

You misspelled delusional… or did you perhaps mean boring?