

mathematic
Senior Members-
Posts
1091 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Calendar
Everything posted by mathematic
-
Mathematics is Inconsistent!
mathematic replied to Willem F Esterhuyse's topic in Analysis and Calculus
The paradox is in pure mathematics. A physical object cannot be decomposed into non-measurable pieces. -
Million equivalent in different !base-10 system ?
mathematic replied to Erina's topic in Mathematics
The base doesn't matter. It'a \\;s a language issue. What is big? -
Look for 'distance converter on line. Pick one.
-
F=1.8C+32.
-
C=5(F-32)/9
-
Try Google.
-
Where did you get these ideas?
-
Strong and weak forces are microscopic - no control? Gravity is affected by moving stuff around.
-
You seem to be jumping from math ro physics. Math starts with arithmetic, next elementary algebra, plane geometry, etc. From your description you need a start at the very beginning.
-
How to use the change of variables technique here?
mathematic replied to Dhamnekar Win,odd's topic in Analysis and Calculus
Change (x,y) to polar coordinates. -
Binary numbers--- what does "base-2" mean?
mathematic replied to PeterBushMan's topic in Applied Mathematics
base digits 2......0,1 3......0,1,2 4......0,1,2,3 etc. -
The Rewriting of Particle Physics....possibly:
mathematic replied to beecee's topic in Classical Physics
Disagreement with other measurements. Error here? -
Incorrect assertion: "The only thing that can travel at the speed of light is light, and if gravity can travel at the speed of light, then it's almost definitely the same thing as light. Also, there's no gravity or light in outer space. Almost certainly a sign that gravity and light are the same particle. " "it's almost definitely the same thing as light." Where did you get this? "there's no gravity or light in outer space" False
-
It is too soon to say. There are about 100 billion stars in the milky way. Only an infinitesimal number has been explored to determine whether life supporting planets exist.
-
Please give me a simple proof, X^0=1.
mathematic replied to PeterBushMan's topic in Applied Mathematics
For \[ x\ne 0,\ x^0\times x^1=x^1=x\] -
In the latest issue of American Scientist there is an article by Tony Rothman questioning E=mc^2. Are the assertions made in the article valid? Are there comments by other physicists available?
-
Several rinses with small amount of water each time is better than one rinse with a lot of water.
-
It would help if you defined symbols.
-
Examples 210=102, 310=112