ed84c

ah; great book you should read, "In search of shrodingers cat" it starts off realy easy, and gets progressivley harder, I seriously suggest you read it.

yeh, i get the basic idea, but im looking more for a bio chemical sort of answer.

what, in neurological terms, is forgetting?

i think its where you have to compare the outcome to the plan, and look at whether you have got the resutls you set out to get. Im pretty sure thats what my science teacher taught me.

Yeh. As far as i know, pure muscle building is good for short bursts of sprinting etc. You may even want to invest in some of that Protein drink they sell, its sold in bulk, so dont be put off by the price tage

http://images.google.co.uk/images?q=VLT&hl=en&btnG=Google+Search

Well there is a telescope in mexico (i think) called VLA- Very Large Array, so the name may exist.

Great a map of america, just what ive always wanted hmmm I did a search for United Kingdom and a number of small ballons popped up allong the east side of kansas.

I dont think it is temporary damage, brain cells dont regenerate, after your like 21 at any rate. Maybe if you strain your brain you may encorage more neurons to join. AS far as your first question goes, im not sure. If delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol is subliminal (sp?) then maybe you could sperated that portion out, and sell it or whatever.

Can you not keep them mixed, and use them yourself? (im not condoning this by the way, far from it)

Im pretty sure that cells can usually only bind to other cells. However they would form a VERY tight fit around some plastic if you tried, i would imagine, so it would kind of work, not very well though.

Because the bonding of K+ and OH- is weaker (K wants its electron less) and so they are more easily split in water (disolving)

I agree with you totally. I am however disturbed by how many people think that time travel is possible.

It would not surprise me if that in a lot of cases, words were put into the childerens mouths on purpouse.

yeh, i was just pointing out what could be conseved a flaw in your argument, allthough i didnt belive it was a flaw myself. Im just being the High School Physics teacher, we've all had.

I read, That using the Wave Function in QM is nay impossible, and the numbers from using it are just as hard to interpret. Maybe i mis read, as i say, if i find the quote in the book (in search of shrodingers cat, i think) ill quote it here.

Why "You (i) am the one to say........."

No, not at all. Your ace and we love you. Knowlage is more powerful than intelligence.

No, i cant stand the prog, more than that i cant stand the fact they put it on for like 10hr shifts.

explain what you meant please.

No, thats not quite what i meant. I meant how to use it mathematically, i think. Ill find you the quote in the book if you want. Im quite happy with the waving of things in QED.

No, the mods here are nice

Can I take it, that we all would like to thank dave lots for his work on this?

Whos to say (me) that the conservation of matter is not a concept which takens into account time and time travel? Zeo, you mention a 'device'; well really you answered your own question. A device cannot IMHO be built to go back in time.