Jump to content

Mike Smith Cosmos

Senior Members
  • Posts

    3218
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Mike Smith Cosmos

  1. .Yes I can see what you are getting at . But I have just read Wikipedia definition and a few other descriptions . Divination is mainly the looking for signs like shape of tea leaves patterns . And or carrying out some form of ritual . My suggestion was just asking a question , outright, and asking for the answer ( little more tricky ). But the protocol or language was just tri. Three symbols .. Left right or centre. I could be signalling a traffic controller down the road ( with lights suddenly stop working ) this signal means this . That signal means that . I am not asking anybody to cut the tail off a cat and use it in a dance. I think I am quite safe , I am only asking some advanced life , one step up on humans to , signal some simple answers , 1) right 2) wrong , 3) in between . Why should we not talk to , the next higher species up from humans I do not think it was considered wrong to attempt to speak to an angel . There are several accounts of contact with and speaking to Angels . I think someone wrestled with one. And the Apostle John imprisoned on the isle of Patmos saw several Angels and was told not to bow to them as they were just fellow .. Something or others .. However it does not do wrong to warn against out and out ritualistic , looking at animals entrails and tea leaves . Dancing about like a whirling Derbeshire ! All I want is to have some simple communication with the next most intelligent creature up the intelligent Hierarchy so I can ask some technical questions about the cosmos and the structure of life within it. I am not asking a lot . I think we are even admonished to persevere with giving the guy at the top a call from time to time . We'll blow me down with a feather , we have gone the whole HIERARCHY from the Top , down in steps all the way to the fishes. Mike
  2. .I am quite capable in testing if some potential ( voltage ) is between 6.05 volt and 6.08 volts if necessary . While dealing with gold fish and ' above human ' beings , I know of no value to measure them by.( either the fish would not stay still long enough before it died of shock . And having never seen an ' above human being' . All I can report is the SYRENDIPODOS action . In other words they are able to slightly change some natural phenomenon. ( without affecting the course of human history ) . Concerned as I was this afternoon that perhaps "should I carry on conducting this simple questioning " . I sat by the river this afternoon . Asked the question three times . Said , LEFT is NO STOP , Right is YES CARRY ON . MIDDLE is ambiguous . I sat for a moment wondering what could happen with the trees in front of me and the river. ( to make a right , left or centre ) The dog suddenly leapt out of a large grass tuft , to my RIGHT . Nearly fell off the bank . Now the deviation of the dogs path is well within the sphere of interference of a free animal , without changing the course of human history . Perhaps we have got so rigorous with 3.2056 volts that we think a " dog leaping out of grass tuft " is not rigorous . Mike Ps I won't embarrass him , but a colleague of ours , on the science forum asked a question about Orthogonality ( right angles ) a year or two back . We both got up at the same time across the globe. He went into a dense Forrest . At the same time he asked his question . When he turned around to look at the path he was on . There appeared to be fallen trees that were not there when he set out. When he returned to look they had fallen over a rock that had two quartz lines that were ar right angles. Sirendipodously .
  3. Not sure what you are referring to as " I simply do not have those feelies you are talking about " Did I say anything about ' feelies' ? What did I say about feelies ? Which post ? # ? Mike
  4. Well I know it is happening , as I have taken part in it over the last 40 years . I almost view it , like " I'll go and ask sir . How we used to handle difficult and insurmountable problems when in 6th form or early years in Uni. So for me to describe ' the HEIRACHY ' that I have been bringing up in this thread , then to give a brief guess at the structure from Gold Fish upwards , I would say it is based of some form of intelligent sensing and recognition , together with a caring measure . So if we start with the gold fish . They clearly are aware of the bugs on the bottom of the pool . Occasionally eat them , probably have little measure of care for the bugs . The fish recognise each other , and more relevant , recognise me.a measure of fear and respect but seem to enjoy being fed. They probably look with Wonder at the Image of me as they look through the water surface . I look down on them with a certain feeling of ranking . Feeding , Caring . I look up to the observing beings which clearly seem to have some form of interest in communication with me from time to time say every month or so . And for all I know have , similar tenuous communication with an unknown large or small number of other humans . Again it's not the sort of question you go around asking people or even you friends . For all I know millions or hardly anyone maybe has this distance sort of contact. I imagine we are fairly boring to the next up in the HEIRARCHY . We could now go on to suppose these observers ( perhaps they are Angels) have contact with other higher HEIRARCHY BEINGS ( perhaps they are ArchAngels . And so on and so on . Just what goes which way I am not sure , ( perhaps I should ask ) Mike .
  5. . I sincerely hope that is not me. I am just a lowly individual , with an inquiring mind desperately trying to find his way in this immense cosmic sea. Doing the thing he only knows how to do . That is. ' ASK his way in this puzzle of life ' . Unfortunately for me , the things I want to know ' how it works ' , is EVERYTHING ! Then, when I find an answer , all I want to do , is jump up and down with glee, and want to tell everybody . Millions of people pose questions on the Internet every day , and get answers every day . Nowerdays , We accept that as normal . I seemed to have tapped into a universe wide, time wide mechanism , that can answer some time wide , universe wide questions . Maybe that is the nature of the Cosmos , namely it is time wide and universe wide network of 'knowledge ' and capable of answering time wide and Universe wide questions , should you care to ask ? ( this all sounds a bit " Hitch Hikers Guide to the Galaxy " ish ) . Yes , well that is the way I found it worked ! When you are a long way away from people , which you must be or you will be categorised as crazy . Then you have exactly what you say , the world divided into three . A chunk to the left , a chunk to the right , and chunk ( one could reasonably say ) is the middle . Having stated audibly , and a few times over , your question IN THE FORM OF A STATEMENT ( like ' Is intelligent life centered at one place in the Cosmos ? ) . Then just gaze about , to the left , to the right , and to the centre area . And wait till you see something significant . Depending on which region has the first significant happening , there is your answer , ( Yes , No, or Ambiguous ) When you see something ' SIGNIFICANT HAPPENING ' , it is obvious what is significant and what is insignificant happening . Note , is it to the RIGHT , LEFT , or CENTRAL Piece of cake ! Warning , do not do this where others can see you . You will be locked up ! . ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Next in order HEIRACHY up above Humans . This area of the discussion lends itself well to the ones responsible for OUR observation , and any SYRENDIPODOS COMMUNICATION with is as INDIVIDUAL Humans. NOT at this particular moment , to mankind as a whole . That is a completely different ' Ball Game ' . As in the relationship between me and my fish . My particular fish , not fish kind ! ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Mike
  6. . No . I make sure there is no one around . Usually out in the country somewhere .or in the depths of our garden ,when nobody is home . And conditions for an undisturbed period . Besides if not I will get locked up , and carted off to a lunatic asylum . I then point out to myself and any one observing me , the three areas . I ask the deep question , by way of a statement state my statement, with three options out loud , while stating the three areas . To my right , everything from ground to sky to my right , waving my arms about , signifies a YES to my statement . All the area from ground to sky to my left represents a NO to my statement . Then waving my user hand about to middle ground to the sky , indicates a MIXTURE ambiguous , BOTH. Then wait a bit , repeating the actions and stating what represents what. Sooner or later something happens , reasonably significant in one of the three areas. There is your answer ! On this occasion you are tuned in and got your answer . Bit like a futuristic three dimensional hyper net ! That I have accidentally strayed into . It observes my question and answers automatically in the format thaI have chosen , and supplies an answer ! WA Hey ! So when I asked the question on " How did the Universe come about ? Was it Creation or Evolution , I got an emphatic answer in stone , BOTH ( MIXTURE ) , right down the middle . Quite categoric and literally in stone . Mike Ps . I imagine anybody reading this will think I have gone ' Stark , Staring , Bonkers. ' . But I have not , and it works ! So perhaps there is evidence from what I have said , which has penetrated an upward step in the HEIRACHY.
  7. .Perfectly clear. As I have developed a protocol which is clearly marked. Namely :- If it is a choice between right or wrong or mix( ambiguous ) . Right is a definite indication to the right Wrong is a definite indication to the left Mix( ambiguous ) indication central . So in the case you asked , it was a question " Is the main intelligence of the universe , centralised ( to indicate by a right hand) , or no but spread out across the universe ( to indicate by a left hand ) . If a mixture ( to indicate central ) . I was a distinct LEFT Indication . Mike The question on ( evolution or creation being the origin of the Universe or a mixture ) that really was very interesting !
  8. Ok . But to set the scene somewhat . I started out on a set of questions , so basic , that I could establish the basics , then build up from there . These were absolutely core questions . Eg . The very first question was " IS THERE ANYBODY THERE ? " The second question was " DID THE UNIVERSE COME ABOUT BY EVOLUTION OR CREATION ? ....... ................. .......................... And so on building up on really fundamental to me questions , ones I really , really , wanted to know , right through to today , asking today's relevant questions . The one you ask was in the middle years of all this say 15 years ago ( in total this has been over approximately 30 years. ) The question I had always been itching to know the answer to, was :- " IF THE UNIVERSE HAS INTELLIGENT BEINGS / BEING IN IT . ARE THESE INTELLIGENT(S) ALL BASED IN SOME SINGLE/CENTRAL POSITION IN THE UNIVERSE OR SPREAD OUT ACROSS THE WHOLE UNIVERSE ? " The answer was totally a surprise to me, as . Had you asked me , if I had to choose the likely answer . I would have said Central . But No . A Clear Indication of :- ALL OVER THE UNIVERSE , NOT IN ONE LOCATION . Mike
  9. I presume by ( last one ) , you mean the last one I mentioned in my last post . To quote me in post # 88 " I have managed to find a method which enables me to ask questions , but only if they are pursued in a certain manner. Eg I cannot ask for a lottery prize number , but for example , I can ask the distribution of advanced intelligence across the Universe. " Is this the one you are asking about " distribution of advanced intelligence across the Universe " I remember this well , if this is the one you want ? How I asked it , and the response . Mike
  10. .. I am trying to summon up an Image or Set of Images , that I can use as the basis of the following statement ! WHILE YOU ARE HERE , COULD YOU JUST .....or .... WHILE you have got your drill out ,could you just.. It is every mans ' night mare ' expression . It sends shudders of images of hours spent fixing something without the correct tools available , and / or , the absence of any materials or days necessary to carry the ' Just ' assignment out . I want to compose and paint an Abstract Painting of this frightening scenario . Any Ideas for the ingredients of my drawing / painting ? Mike
  11. . There is quite a lot here to answer , which I will try to do , if not all straight away , some now , some later. :- The main point being :- Yes , I think there is / are some equal/ superior beings around somewhere. I beleive the experience I had on the moor and elsewhere over a period of many years , was / is , enough to convince me with quite an ongoing sequence of events , that left me of no doubt that :- There is something , many things that are there , unseen during the normal course of events . .not physical things , but information about things we have discussed. And things yet to come . I have managed to find a method which enables me to ask questions , but only if they are pursued in a certain manner. Eg I cannot ask for a lottery prize number , but for example , I can ask the distribution of advanced intelligence across the Universe. Mike
  12. I do not think we can rank our Hierarchy by physical strength or fighting ability . . If that were the case, Dinosaurs and Sharks would rule the earth. My horse illustration , was merely to show the way we can interact within a Hierarchy. I think it is obvious to ALL that man is at the top of the HIERARCHY, ON earth . What we need to do now is to Suppose a higher order of life exists somewhere in the Universe . Our job is to establish contact , one way or another , in such a way , that we can work within a similar ranking as the ( goldfish to humans ) . Only because we have this as a model . If we desire to go to the complete top of the Hierarchy , in one hit , I think we will be entering the region of religion , which many people ( not all ) in the science community have difficulties with ? However if that is the way you wish to go , you can attempt that . Using the way I suggested ........example ................................. In the 1960's I was in my 20's years old . We discussed all sorts in those years . In conjunction with a friend we worked out , any life forms ( spacemen ) off worlders would NOT make themselves visible, overtly , but very obliquely . Namely , as to be almost , ' there ' but not there. We calculated that this would be an Oblique , sirendipodously , encounter. There , but almost not there. All most to be dismissed , but not to be dismissed. I left this thought for 10,s of years . But over the years into my 40,s and 50's I kept comming back to this thought. Hollywood films had shown si fi ' s with well meaning off worlders comming to earth as a normal looking human , but with powerful skills to find himself , strapped down , imprisoned , almost killed, etc , only to break free and wish the world well. ..... .... In my sixties , I found myself one day in isolation on the hills , still thinking we were being observed without visible intervention . There on that moor , I could wait no longer . Convinced there were , in some way , off world observers of a superior nature. So this was my time , my question . O.k. I said out loud . Totally alone in the middle of a moor . I just need to know , if you are actually there ( there, being somewhere observing us ) ........ I just need to know for definite. " yes or no " ( my question ) IS THERE ANYBODY THERE, surely there must be a serendipitous way , this can be communicated , please indicate some way ? ... .... .... And sure enough it came ...the ambiguous .. Sirendipodously... Affermative ...... Communication .................... WE ARE BEING OBSERVED ..............by higher beings Mike
  13. . Great ! You are half way there . Now you need to know 1 ) where . ............?..... Anywhere quiet alone 2 ) how to look for answers to bigger issues ! Possibly Pose an answer yourself (. Left Right. Centre for ,) watch for something to happen (left =wrong ) ( right = right ,) ( centre = neither right or wrong) Ps. I probably just gave away one of the most fantastic secrets of ( gateway to communication with higher beings ) . What the heck , it should be available to everyone ! Here is a painting , I recently finished . Note the man at the RIGHT hand end . The horses are in harmony with each other and the higher being in the HEIRARCHY the Man Mike
  14. . What sort of evidence would you require ? I can think it through from my goldfish experience . In this instance the fish seemed to have found a very simple method of receiving food from me. If they hover around in a line facing me each morning looking expectant , I will respond by throwing some fish food out to the centre of the pond . This is a simple way to express their desire to be fed from a being ' higher up the Heirachy ' . ( in this case me ) So if you or I can make a similar gesture to a supposed higher being and ' in some way appear expectant to receive what we have asked for ' , maybe we will receive what we ask for ! Knowing what to ask a superior being is the next part . Maybe with us , like the fish , it's not absolutely essential , but rather nice if it happens . I must say , I have tried it , and it appears to work . I think it is a bit like going next door to your neighbour . If you knocked on their door and said , " I don't suppose you could help me , I am keen to get hold of some bi carbonate of soda , to settle my tummy ." If they have it I am sure they would give it to you . This they would not have done without your request. Now if these superior intelligent lives out there are far more advanced than us , maybe they would have a way of hearing you . Now it's just a matter of asking for some ' knowledge or otherwise' , see what happens . Suggest you do this far away from anyone ( or you might get locked up ) . Let me know how you get on . The secret is getting the question right ! Ps We nearly do this nowerdays with the Internet ( man made ) . Ask a simple question in the box on the screen and the possible answer appears . The avenue to these advanced beings would be easier than the Internet . JUST ASK THE QUESTION and see what happens . ( this evidence might be what you require ) Mike
  15. I think where there may be some confusion is I am talking mainly about individuals or a few , as opposed to a species or bulk country or civilisation . For example me (Mike ) and a few goldfish ( nameless ) going down , and me ( mike ) and who/whatever is capable of observing and even feeding me information, from the HEIRACY individual/s upstream . Mike
  16. I am not sure about all these negatives and double negatives. . I would sooner, take the optimistic , double positive route, in that way there is a double chance of finding something and a single chance , ' one ' could be proved wrong . This way you open all stops for a good result ! Perhaps there is some form of 'as yet undescovered rule ' in this Heirachy mechanism for semi intelligent life . Perhaps ' encouragement is an ingredient for success . Eg . The fish give me , ( the higher up the Heirachy species ) , just a minimal of unwitting encouragement to feed them and count them , and generally caretaker their environment , so as to prosper. I respond by giving all this attention . All they needed to do was to come up from the murky depths and been seen , which makes me feel good and continue daily with my care taking activity. . ( after all , as an aside , this is what happens in a dog / dog owner relationship . Exactly that ) So could this work for the next HEIRARCHY up.? .like we need to half believe there is higher life forms . Go about our day to day life as if there is higher life forms . Maybe then the higher life forms will respond with.............? Something indicative of their existence . If we say No ! No higher life forms exist , maybe they respond with , " we are not going to get very far here , and so leave those that refuse to accept higher life form existence alone ? I really do think we are on to something here ! Mike
  17. . Quite , I agree with you . But if you are really looking for something , there is a tendency to ' see it ' in the wall paper or clouds . But maybe we should not abandon this attribute .because the opposite is true , that if you do not want to see something you will not , unless it is ' blatant ' I would prefer a middle ground ." What if this were , just possible " " what might I just find out ? " I personally have taken this ' stance ' when considering the existence of ' intelligence at a higher level than mankind ' . Like , if it does exist , what could we expect from it ? Then stand back and watch the show ! Mike
  18. A new photo has come to my attention , by a fellow thinker. This was in the sky , what is it ? Mike If nothing else , we appear to desire to make images in our vision of what we are looking for ?
  19. . Your comment " I don't get the need you seem to have for hierarchies, " Well, I am curious , as I am sure many people are , as to " what is possibly above us in the ranking of ' intelligent life '. in the Universe at large ? " in other words " is there anything floating about anywhere , which at some time or other , we would get an enthralling experience, as well as gain useful knowledge of things we perhaps struggle with about " the Universe at large " As the famous broadcaster John Snagg of ' letter to America fame ' once said " if you find yourself sitting next to the ' Dali Lama ' as I ' John Snagg' found myself while flying from England to America , what do you ask him? .................. To attempt to answer the questions I have, ( I have not flown from England to America , let alone sat next to the ' Dali Lama' ! or been able to ask such far reaching questions , about higher intelligent beings! ) So while waiting around through my life for such a coincidence , I have set about asking the questions , about , ' Higher life forms ' ! For the same reason on many occasions in normal life , when you find yourself in the presence of a particular expert , does one often ask the question " what is your take on ' bla de bla ' . To find yourself ' gob struck ' to hear expert understanding given on your pet subject . So before asking , I have sought to answer to question " Is there likely to be anyone , anything , any higher being about , anywhere, anytime , to ask ? So , as I look around , or read about , or see video's about , LIFE in various shapes and sizes , I thought " is there any features about the " DIFFERENCES OF ACTIVITY , OR APPROACH , OR OTHER BEHAVIOUR " which help me to understand if there was any intelligent life HIGHER than US . Hense the experiment spoken of in this thread . The creatures I have used , are those ' near to hand ' namely Goldfish in my pond , Bugs that I am advised are crawling about on the bottom of the pond , Me outside the pond , observing the goldfish behaviour , and the proposed Intelligent life somewhere capable of observing me , observing my goldfish ! The idea of Ranking or Heirachy is a fairly loose description of the obvious difference in Intelligence of the scale of Heirachy going through :- BUGS - FISH - HUMAN - ( HIGHER INTELLIGENT LIFE FORM ) Bugs to fish , I can think about , Fish to human I can think about and observe very detailed and Well, Human to intelligent life I can think about , experiment and predict , possibly test . -------------------------------- If there is a linked HEIRARCHY in existence , then the main detailed link between Gold Fish and Man in this two way difference , ,I believe could give assistance and insight into the possible descovery of a link between Man and Higher Intelligence . -------------------------------- Mike Now having said that SURFING THE UNIVERSE sounds like a good time, exactly what was he doing? I have a long standing male friend , who I met during our children's open days at primary school . My children are grown up with children of there own , so that must be 25 years ago approx . We had similar interests and mind in both Science , Art , and Philosophy , and have been in touch continually fairly regularly over those 25,years. We can sit and talk for hours as well as go out into the Devon - Cornwall environment ( UK ) as well as doing the occasional experiment and observation. This night we had gone to a coastal town for a walk and a drink , and ended up in a pub that was just setting up a Rock and Roll band performance - ' Man , was it loud ' , great , but we could not hear ourselves ' think ' , let alone each other comment . So we ' wrote on beer mats ' questions and answers . The one question that got a hold was " WHAT IS THE MOST ENJOYABLE EXPERIENCE ONE CAN HAVE ( of an in principal sustained , continuous , basis ) , ? " In between the time listening to this deafening yet enjoyable ' live rock band ' pub performance , we jointly came up with :- To Surf the universe , ..... For a few seconds , .... For a length of time ...... For Ever ........if you can catch the Universe ( as in one of AIRBRUSH's big waves , and figuratively ' Surf the Surf ' ) .. But from a ' pick up on the Universe itself , ' and surf it . Boy , that is about 'As good as it gets ' Courtesy of AIRBRUSH ( fellow Science Forum Contributor ) Mike
  20. Airbrush I like your further comments about your view of the possibilities for higher up the Heirachy .. Of course this ( if my proposition is right about up and down the hierarchy differences) is what to expect . Namely , that the view downward is clear , the view upward is very fuzzy . How one can clarify the view upwards is an interesting subject in its own right . I suppose if the gold fish wanted a better view of me , they could make an almighty leap out of the water and have a good stare at me, and get a clearer image , and go back down and express in ' fishy language ' to the other fish , what I was really like ! What the equivalent of that is for us trying to gauge a snatch perception of any possible higher beings .. Is up for grabs . I did start to try a few years ago, in a sort of experimental way , which sort of continues to this day . Slightly convoluted. Mike Ps . A Philosophical friend of mine , and myself , had an elongated conversation , while listening to a very loud Rock and roll band , one night in a pub. The conclusion we came to that evening was " that there is no greater experience that one can gain in life , than to ' SURF THE UNIVERSE ' .
  21. I have seen a comment on this thread, that stated that Science does not need reality , in order for science to be correct and true . I can not see that , that can be correct ! It might be correct in a stand alone capability. The capability of working within the zone of science ONLY . BUT in the zone of EVERYTHING , like REALITY included , it would be an incomplete understanding of the COSMOS. MIKE Eg 1+1 = 2 is true in one setting ( real numbers ) but is not true with (complex variables !! )
  22. . Airbrush, I am interested in your ideas as to what is ' up ' the Heirachy from our Human state. I have reflected on this subject , up through my life , in greater and lesser degrees. When asked to do a painting sketch ( in an art session ) the other day of this subject , the overseeing art teacher , showed the keenest of interest . Being 90 years old , I suppose that was predictable . ( he was the one that said " look at Omar Khayyam" . However , I think many people reflect on the subject " is there more than us ? " because of the "blurred " sence when looking upward ( demonstrated by my analysis of the ' Human Heirachy ' , whatever there is , is definitely like those fish in the pool. They think they can go on quite adequately without me , but I know better , as I might change my ideas about the pool and scrap it ! What happens to the fish then ? Do I find them a new home ? Or do I ' toss them down the bank ? ' ( very unlikely ) . I would be interested in your ideas . Mike
  23. So what exactly do we as ordinary members of the public need to DO or WATCH OUT FOR .? Mike
  24. One of my daughters runs her entire life by PayPal and other electronic trading sites . Private life and Business life . I need to get hold of her to warn her . , Mike
  25. . Strikes me .. The Internet is Not a Safe Place to be , anymore , Unless you are a computer wiz kid ? Or the major providers MAKE IT A SAFE PLACE TO BE .... and tell us when they have done in , only by world wide media coverage . Mike Ps Perhaps someone should warn the world that PAYPAL may be contaminated , or a dangerous place to operate with your money ( at the moment ) ? I do not think it can be me, or I will end up in concrete Wellington Boots !
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.