Imagine Everything

Questions... Questions, intentions, emotions & more, The old man sighed heavy, his skin tight & raw, Why am I here? To do what & what for? Why am I curious, always needing some more, I need to know stuff, know why I can see, How I make progress as age catches me, Some questions bring answers & they are his prize, Though some aren't so welcome, all open his eyes, Is wisdom the best? Would youth not avail?, The questions are endless, some left in the pale, Time takes him forward or back/both may..be? Does he exist both in pre & post BB?, Is it butterfly wings without any doubts? Does the universe care if he breathes or shouts. Probably not, he ponders & yearns, So many questions yet too much to learn.

Thanks @exchemist That diagram was really interesting & useful. +1

Thanks @Mordred, that was heavy & reminded me of how much out of my depth I am. Whilst I do not understand the maths still, perhaps over time I might understand a little more than I currently do. I appreciate the response. Forgive my terminology too please, I didn't mean to imply that you are poor or old, it was just a term of endearment. You didn't say anything but I second guess myself a lot & have pondered on that since I wrote it. One thing I do a lot is watch how people behave or react, I've had to for a long time, perhaps I might loosely call this my own observations. It helps me to possibly foresee what might proceed certain behaviours in people.

Hope this helps, taken from the linked site. Most space rocks smaller than a football field will break apart in Earth’s atmosphere. Traveling at tens of thousands of miles per hour, the object disintegrates as pressure exceeds the strength of the object, resulting a bright flare. Less than 5% of the original object usually makes it down to the ground. NASA ScienceMeteors and Meteorites: Facts - NASA ScienceMeteoroids are space rocks that range in size from dust grains to small asteroids. This term only applies when these rocks while they are still in space.

Why oh why oh why oh why, Is the water so wet yet gin can be dry, Sand can be grainy, compact & quick, Playing guitar requires a pick, This poem is random, entropic perhaps, Maybe one day it will earn a few claps, My poems are humerous, hopefully good fun, That's it for now, have a good night everyone.

I'll take that as a reverse kind of compliment 😀Glad you didn't call me salt or pepper, I'd have taken that as a condiment 😁

Sorry, I should have been more specific. Please don't +1 me. Feel free to +1 each other :) You deserve it.

Firstly, please don't +1 this, I posted this to simply say thank you to you all for taking the time to share your knowledge, your wisdom & your time. It's not about me, it's about you, the resident & other experts. You don't have to do this, you don't have to put up with people who can be annoying or have a minimal grasp on maths etc yet you do & you all keep doing it. I appreciate it & am grateful for your time & knowledge, not just here on the forum but also the years you have all put into your various skill sets so you can help others. One of the fundamental things that ALL people have, is the ability to give. So this is my give to you, Thank you.

If anyone else reading this has had trouble with that part of your body, you should absolutely go & get checked asap, no matter how old you are. Especially if you are losing weight too.

Thanks @swansont , that's very interesting.

Thanks @studiot , I will have a look at that. I guess I started the debate about not being answered because I was waiting 3 weeks ish & still nothing. I know it was Christmas & I wasn't criticising, it just leaves me wondering whether I'm being silly whilst also frustrating for me because I simply don't know if I have asked stupid questions. I don't expect you guys to answer everything & perhaps people like that Jacek character put you all off a bit from answering others, I can understand that. Poor old Mordred came back from a busy rl & walked straight into him or her. For what it's worth I learnt a great deal from the way @Mordred responded to him or her. I question myself, the things I do or say, more than I do all of you or anyone else. I still question myself over why I got so dissapointed at perhaps being thought of as possibly crank ish by @MigL in my other post. I should have embraced that in hindsight, even being wrong is a way to learn. It feels similar to my thought pattern that what a person says is as important as what someone doesn't say. But in that case, it was me who perhaps said the wrong thing. The things I've talked about here with you all are very strange to me. This vision thing is very strange to me yet I seem compelled somehow to follow it still, as much as I can anyway. Anyway, time for me to go look up Through normal distribution, when you observe each & every measurement of x, do the individual measurements/observations mean anything to you other than just a single part of the normal distribution? Is the overall normal distribution the only things that matters? Hope I said that right. Also hope you got your computer sorted out, I know how annoying that is.

If a particle is created & decays almost instantly, does or can the wavelength from the created particle carry on kinetically? If it can, does it also decay or can it contribute to a knock on effect? I'm thinking of Ke traveling through water after a landslip into that body of water.

Thanks @exchemist

I'm afraid I'm left wondering if I am asking silly questions sometimes, I see no one replied to the above. It would be nice for someone to even say that to me as it would help me understand a bit more perhaps. I won't bite if you think I'm being crank ish. Anyway, Are photons pretty much everywhere? Are photons a medium through which all? or certain? types of wavelength/s pervade? Dark or light. Are there still 'dark' photons that exist today? And if there are, do they also interact somehow with light photons?

Added the missing 's' to ecclesiastical. . I think of this next poem in the tune of Old MacDonald had a farm Natural science has a forum, Phi Pi Phi Bio, And on that forum were experts who helped the to & fro, With an up quark here and a down quark there, Dark matter flowing through the eternal aether, Natural science has a forum, Phi Pi Phi Bio. And on that forum were students, Chi Bi Chi Geo, Some did learn and some did not, some were in despair, With a BH here and an EH there, Space so vast and things so rare, Natural science leads us all, Chi, Pi, Phi, Bio.

Two priests in a bar Two priests in a bar looking so sad, One asks the bartender how much is his tab, £5M pounds, you've run a large bill, Might buy a safe that won't fit in a till, Priest no.1 asks the other for money, Priest no.2 says no! don't be funny, The sum is too vast, way way way too fantastical, He shouldn't charge priests, it's not ecclesiatical.

Thanks @studiot Whats the maths equation for that please? It might be useful later on. And the error could be or is decay/creation interaction? Just a thought but this almost looks a bit like half a wavelength to me. Is there an opposite bell curve too?

Interesting play on words/idea. @geordief If anyone found my newton reply cheesy, would that make it a mulled whine?. (wine)

Thanks @studiot I think I understand what you mean. Is random radioactive decay a variation? Also, is there common variations & or deviations in all measurements?. Does/do one or more stand out often when calculating an equation?.

Yet under a tree an apple did fall, A genius left to wonder & mull.

That sounds very very confusing. Thanks. It kind of helps.

Bill Nye is clever, one scientist of many, Kaku is too, he's probably made quite a penny, Parallel worlds, strings you say, Hopefully science will learn it one day, Science is awesome, it made you & me, Maybe one day, it might answer the BB, What happened to start with, what happening now, I tilt my hat, you all get a bow.

Is random radiation decay not entropic then? Do you know the pattern that it decays at & knowing so can add that into your equations? I don't mean to sound hung up on radiation decay. I'm interested in the results you get from your measurements. Their accuracy & tolerance I think. Does that mean that most or all errors are accounted for & considered in any equation science makes?. Can you pinpoint every known, known error & then observe the 'true' measurement of things knowing that or does the +/- give you the cushion that caters for the known errors?

Thanks @swansont It seems that eventually a lot of normal distribution comes down to radioactive decay. Fascinating. So radioactive decay seen as both systematic & random errors, is that right?. Is all known matter radioactive, does everything lose heat & what does heat become?. In saying that, would this mean that any measurement of radioactive matter, will always have an random error due to random radioactive decay among possible other things?.

Thanks @exchemist for the wiki link, that was useful. So no matter what, interaction always causes the measurement to be slightly different. If I measured a proton 100 times & they each correctly measured the proton within +/- How many of those correctly measured within +/- are the same as each other? And how many times does that occur within those 100 measurements? If I were to label each measurement of that proton from 1-100 & then group up the measurements that were exactly the same within that 100, could I expect to see something like the following? 1, 3, 96, 98 23, 45, 75, 89 13, 21, 37, 79 11, 17, 19, 24 ... Hope that makes sense. The numbers/symbols are random, I could have chosen any four to illustrate or even letters. It's the grouping/patterns that I'm curious about.