StringJunky

No idea.

She illustrates that gender is a continuum and stuck in the middle.

If there is no space there can't be 'over here and over there'. They are a function of space.

Right. Would you like to critique it now for possible modification. Is the main title ok; How old are you? I'd like to word it and set it up in the most anonymous way possible. The idea is to get the distribution not personal details. Edit: Poll modified and also finessed for the younger groups as the differences in educational development/physical and mental maturity are greater, as JC pointed out.

OK. What choices would you put? Would you put a range of years in the same sort of blocks that I put above? Do decade blocks? e.g. 1930 - 1940

I thought it would be interesting to see what the current age distribution is here. If you wish to declare your age group or age, you can in a post in this thread but it is not required for the purposes of the poll. I'm in the 1961 -1970 group.

I think quantum fluctuations are hypothesised to have initiated the inhomogenity and instability which kicked it off.

What is distance when there was no space, no space no time. . Space and time are interrelated, remember.

The large scale structure is made up of cobwebby filaments of interconnected galaxies and gasses; it's that space between those filaments that will expand.

A is bound to B and B is bound to C. They are a gravitationally bound group.

Space, distance or volume.

Sorry. I read it wrong.

What you gonna do with forever? Any idea how long that is? Except the brain... or some parts of it anyway.

Up to the intergalactic level - within 200MLYS - they won't change, due to the expansion, because the forces binding those, including gravity up to about that range, are too strong.

... and also what they like/don't like.

No, Any things closer than 200 million lightyears apart are bound by forces stronger than expansion.

Guarunteed assistance to high impact journal: $1000

Your destiny on the matter is in your own hands. I don't think there's anymore than has already been said.

He might be more interested in Pokemon Go, though.

Not in my experience.

It's not a conspiracy. There is nothing a typical scientist would like more than to poke a big hole in an established theory; it means recognition for them and a job well done.

...because you don't like it as it is.

It's about fishing. I was J/K. All these high-brow books people throw I thought I'd chuck that out. Good book though... if you're 15-.16...educative in the ways of amour.. It was written in the seventies.

Happy Hooker by Xaviera Hollander