ahmet

On 6/22/2019 at 3:13 PM, swansont said:

Weather is not climate, and it can be cooler in some areas and yet the overall temperature in the world can be (and is) going up.  

   haha. both op's opening paragraph and this sentence seems a bit cute.   

to me, I agree to op. it seems really strange. Here in turkey it is not raining this autumn. 

but I ...I am positive almost always these days. Thus this issue currently does not bother me (until it be regional (but here) chaos or global chaos.

22 minutes ago, timo said:

Do I understand it correctly that the issue you see is the following: One unit in x-direction is a different amount of pixels (or cm on paper, if you'd print it out) than one unit in y-direction. Is that what you mean? That is indeed the case. I have never considered a problem.

yes correct. and this is an important problem to me. (and yes, both axes will/should be shown with the same units (e.g.: mm (x), mm( y) or cm( x) , cm(y))

I try to understand the characters of functions. 

but simply showing two graphs almost same one of them between -2,2 and the other one -100,100 is a problem in my work. 

what is more,presumably this Pogramming does not provide 3D plotting. 

to sum up this comment, I should nevertheless exceptionally  thank to you for providing information. 

thank you @timo for commenting. 

to begin with, I think I am not good in plotting. but simply need to see some or wide range of graph of functions. 

thus, if you believe that it would worth,then I will pass the programming level for learning it.

but for now, it seems a problem exists above, the range of y  (f) function (value set) does not seem with same ratio. Therefore, again the graphs you drawn are not realistic.

(meanwhile, I only used this commands)

curve(x^3, -5, 5)

curve(x^3, -3, 3) but same graphs.  (you of course shown the numbers corrrectly,  but those numbers are not with their real height)

maybe, I have lack of information about how to plot with  R,rather than criticizing it, but not sure. 

16 minutes ago, studiot said:

Anyway although it is a team effort, each member of the team works alone and then hands their part on to the next member.

mmm, probably this sentence means that if any team's member wants ,then he/she can do something else at the same time working in the team.

1 hour ago, studiot said:

Here are some examples from my experience.

If it's maximum money you want.

I have a friend who started his business from my front room and became a millionaire.
He said to me "If I work as an engineer (as part of a team) I can only make the wages of one engineer."

"But if I supply engineers to many clients at a %, I am not limited by the wages of an engineer, just the number of engineers I can supply"

On the other had in the late 1960s, an aircraft design company (Rotax) want to test the idea of teamwork with either a mix of specialists or groups of specialists of the same discipline.

So they gave these groups the task of designing and producing a safe control for two wing pumps, A and B.
The point was that the aircraft power supply was inadequate to start both pumps at the same time, although it could run both together once started.
Most machinery is like this it takes more power to start them than to run them.

The mechanical engineering group came up with a complicatd mechanical interlock between switch A and switch B.
The electronic engineering group came up with a fancy digital circuit board electronic version.

Both were tested by simultaneously jabbing both switches by hand.
Both failed.

The lone genius came up with a simple single two position switch labelled switch on A , switch on B.

In the offshore oil industry it takes teamwork to move a laybarge or an oil rig.
One is moved by a team of tender tugs shifting anchors and onboard winches,
The other by towing with a team of tender tugs.

However it takes a talented individual to set one of these tugs alongside an oilrig, laybarge or service jetty.

 

can we find anyone who aim earning no much money ?

but of course not everyone reach to the target point. 

I am unable to provide comprehensive comment but already it does not seem meaningful ....and  more than speaking, working hard is required as you know.

on the other hand, yes, the strategy is highly effective. 

the example you provided is both cute and important .

thank you very much for sharing your valuable experience.

15 minutes ago, Phi for All said:

We may have different definitions of "rude".

I understand. 

(with reminding a notation: that opinion definitely does not belong to me)

also, I do not  approach any language as "rude" or "strange" or "odd", but I almost commonly come across with people stating their opinion also with their mimics or acts.

thanks for sharing your idea.

mmm, I am open to suggestions. 

😉

16 minutes ago, Bufofrog said:

What is R?

it is a program, deemed to be used or known(famuous)  by many statisticians.

18 minutes ago, Phi for All said:

Some languages can sound harsh to foreign ears. People speaking German often sound angry to me, while people speaking Arabic or Cantonese often sound excited. 

   way interesting to hear.

because I know or come across many people stating arabic was a rude language,at least many turkishes. 

a notation: the opinion appearing above does not belong to me. 

meanwhile, my arabic level is B1

I am trying to analyze graphs. 

but the interesting thing is that although I change the intervals sensitively, it gives me the same graph.

(embodiment: try to draw [math]  f(x)= x^{3} [/math] ,select first the interval [-2,2] and [-5,5] or symmetric else differently, see what happens.)

so, can we...?

6 minutes ago, joigus said:

I think this is a great question, and I would like to see it asked (as well as read proposals to answer it) in a more general context.

ya yes, thank you.

unfotunately ,I waited almost 7 years or more to try to give an answer to this question but still do not know.

however, I decided that waiting was time consuming

thus , I started something

hopefully I will start to my business too. 

9 minutes ago, studiot said:

A camel is a horse designed by a committee

ahahahhahaha ahahhaa haha      

I suddenly remmebered  @joigus hahahhahaha

9 minutes ago, studiot said:

Not always as I said, in my personal experience.

not always yes, but as far as I know the most successfull (more clearly: the most prosperous) people are in groups.

maybe I am wrong.not sure.

9 minutes ago, studiot said:

A camel is a horse designed by a committee

within laughing, this might contain a tricky meaning. because this might contain this one:

"camel: a group of engineers are working too much, but do not earn much money"

if yes, you might have neglected a detail: groups / teams are acting like a human at the background 

we can also extend this to a country.

thus, what achievement is might be a bit different or multidimensional 

what do you think/believe on this issue?

5 minutes ago, studiot said:

The ultimate team is, of course the committee, have you heard about the committee and the camel?

commitee or comission, I presume. Or Yes I heard but not sure about the full scope of this word.

I have no idea about camel.

5 minutes ago, studiot said:

No.

Teams sometimes work out well, but there was research back along to suggest that teams sometime fail because of their structure.

I also do not know this issue well , but (if I consider myself) far from the issue; it seems collaboration groups / teams are really successfull. 

but it is good for me to hear that. thanks. 

being infomal in even musics is so much effective really if its in the conformity with it ...

hahaha reea    

or ,are there any specific research that might support this idea?

hi,

I have not clearly understood what kind of message you want to transmit to us but as the title is very clear and its color is very obvious, while I would not like to make any explanation about my own idea in the current position,I would definitely express  one woman who has far relation with me; she says:

"why someone says to other ones marking or calling them as 'stupid' ?

did they create them?"

Clarification: that woman intented to express that it would not be convenient to call anyone as "stupid". I can also consider that this would always be an insulting word. 

(assume please someone head to you by calling you with this word,the implication is also awful.)

however, under this instructions we can also not call someone even if someone has had disease (mental ilnesses)

because (although this approach will potentially include relative idea) that woman also expressed this in the content

"you or people did not create that one, so you/they cannot call him as 'stupid' " and illness is generally not in your hand 

some keywords: ethics ,aesthetics,manner, human rights.  

pink winds from russia ...

wwuuuuuuu :) :) :) 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wbSxTL_Fppw&list=RDy_ONldN0pCE&index=9

12 hours ago, mathematic said:

log has discontinuity at 0.  arc ? - what do you mean?

as it explained we will accept [math] -\infty,\infty [/math] as points. Thus this is not a type of discontinuity. (but if any case be occured like right limit and left limit are different points then this will be discontinuity.)

and arc means inverse trygonometric functions (e.g. arcsin(x) ,arccos(2x), etc)

hi,

I do not remember whether any function given in this category has had discontinuoum point. But with one notation: [math] -\infty, \infty  [/math] are accepted as points. (This is real analysis)

thus if any point accepts its limit  one of these points,then this is not a problem. (however, one point cannot accept both of these points as limit point ,because this will be accepted as discontinuoum)

elementary functions : LAPTE

L: logaritmic

A: arc 

P: polynomic

T: trygnometric

E: exponential. 

thanks.

3 hours ago, HallsofIvy said:

"

 

graphs yes. To me,although during maths BSc program  no one mentioned ( in spite of other very strict contexts ), (because that example is too simple to me ( 1= radius circle)

I almost always was thinking it would not be accepted  even as a function , because for instance when we draw the graph, it is possible to find two elements which their values (under the functions's rule) are same but, are not equal.

( here if x= sint ,y = cost ,e.g: for t=45 degree , [math] x^2+y^2=1 [/math] is being satisfied but there when the angle is 135 degree , y value is again same thus this should not be accepted as a function in fact)

meanwhile, you might be right, because as I remember, the curves and functions are slightly different (probably there was continuoum between the definitions or homeomorphism,I do not remember well,sorry for that but can scan the documents if you want,or you might be better on this issue)

the definition of function is simply

f: A ---> B , every x element of A should have a value in B , and when [math] x_1=x_2 [/math] (these are element of A) and   [math]f(x_1)=f(x_2)[/math] this is compulsory.  E  xamplifed above for circle. (circle equation is not a function) but if you specifically define it between 90-180 and 0-270 ,then well this will be accepted as a function. (but the domain set and value sets will be changed as you can predict)

.....................

On 8/16/2020 at 9:55 PM, studiot said:

I just caught part of a TV program called Spy in the Wild.

BBC1 1735 - 1835 today.

I will have to complete it on iplayer /catch up.

It shows the most amazingly realistic robotic artificial animals designd to fool real animal herds in the wild in order to video the.

These robots look like the real thing, orangutangs, crocs, egrets, penguins, sea otters etc and have sound vision and realistic action.

These are unprecedented scientific tools but watching them made me wonder the title question

How soon before we can make a Terminator ?

They are so nearly there.

 

Watch the programme if you get a chance.

pahahaha   never mind such things.  mmm, listening musics gives more pleasure than imaging such things 

peheh   

A recommendation: I suggest that you visit Antalya's The Land Of Legends or vialand in istanbul or any else a good theme park rather than imaging such things, I guarantee more pleasure.