Jump to content


Senior Members
  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by fredreload

  1. That is what I am trying to do with this thread, given I did not work out the Lorentz transformation, mistake on my part. To generate enough energy equivalent to length contraction done by that of a black hole. Clearly I got my own distance equation to work with, speculation. Do I not get to choose who I reply to now = =? Or are you interested in the thread?
  2. Cuz they locked just about all my topics = =, and i got a -10 rep I am scared of the members
  3. His explanation says that energy bends space time and that energy is from E=mc^2. I substituted velocity for c clearly usually that is not the case(because length contraction is only achievable in light speed) by what 50%? But not all the time. And why is this wrong? It is wrong because it is not in speculation? What is wrong with my formula?
  4. Did I not provide the Cisco guy example or is his idea also non real Physics? So I am the only guy that thinks you can generate light through magnetic field on a conductor? How do your distinguish real from not real again with your Physics?
  5. Well if you guys do not yell out the first thing that comes into your head from my statement, is magnetic field consisted of photons "No", and or try to bend rules like Osmium has a huge mass I would appreciate it if you guys would help me construct this photon machine(getting a live subject through would be hard). Given, sure if I completely skip the equation E=mc^2. And it seems you guys only stick to classical physics, is that even a rule in the guidelines = =? Forgoing all the hard work and creative ideas people put into posts, well if that is a rule I would follow and stick around longer. Yes my Kung Fu might not be strong, nor is misleading my info. Sounds harsh, but you got good ideas Strange.
  6. Well I respect the mods, else I would not be posting here. For starters, tell me what I can or cannot post on this forum or kindly direct me to the rules. And for the people answering here. Not being sarcastic but, is this credible? No No, again
  7. This is the way back. It allows you to fall through space time, based on the Minkowski time line it would either get you to the future or the past. You have to bend space time in such a way where it does not fold as the animation says, I am not sure why but either way you can fall through this space time. Assuming your consciousness does not coincide with your previous self it would be a safe trip otherwise meeting the dinosaurs.
  8. Thanks Endy, mod can move this to speculation, they dunno about the way back.
  9. That is if you converted osmium to pure energy, it is a rock. P.S. If you are not happy about my post just put it in theoretical science. I am taking a break for tonight.
  10. Yes, but then you wouldn't be able to focus it on a spot(2 centimeter of high energy photons sheet for 2 meters of length contraction), but to pass through the entire planet length (1*10^8m) to achieve a length contraction of 2 meters(2 meters of length contraction). Unless you have something extremely dense, like the Superman's key to his base in the size of 2 centimeter built from the mass of a star. Btw, someone teleported something into my stomach, I think it is harmless. You can ignore this statement. P.S. That is the point of this idea, you are using a 2 centimeter high energy photon sheets to create a portal in 2 centimeters for a 2 meters length. Passable by me 108kg or anyone 108kg and below. So when you pass through this 2 centimeters you essentially traveled 2 meters. Based on the high school teacher, an element is not supposed to be found on earth is found on earth's crust because of length contraction, this is my only proof. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Length_contraction P.S. An analogy would be, if earth exploded, or is gone, you would be somewhere in the space on top due to length contraction going back to normal. P.S. Base on #9 P.S. For not pissing people off you can put this in theoretical science @@
  11. I see, guess I have to think of an alternative method, thanks for the heads up. As you can see I am trying to focus enough photon energy on a "spot" to create length contraction. Fitting the photon energy into the E=mc^2 equation E=photon energy. I really don't think alternate universe exist. You can ignore this statement.
  12. I see, that explains the nuke, you think 1 gram of potassium-40 would generate enough energy through gamma rays? Do I multiply mol by something? P.S. Btw length increment is not possible with negative distance, I think
  13. My bad, I meant not to challenge your authority but I cannot find a .org source to support my claim. Well I appreciate the kind explanation except my reputation went from a -6 to a -9 is that even normal in this thread = =? Well this is helpful information, I would like a more credible light source enough to achieve the energy needs. Allow me to explain. The idea about energy causing space contraction is from this idea. https://www.quora.com/Do-photons-bend-space-time And from the response of Eric Pepke, works at Cisco. "It's a very tiny effect, practically negligible for any purposes. Theoretically, yes they do, but it's in a very strange way. The thing that distorts space-time isn't mass or energy. It's energy/momentum, energy and momentum taken together. This is usually represented as a funny kind of vector, though quaternions work as well. The rest mass is a scalar, which is the absolute value of this energy/momentum construct. When the momentum is zero, a lot of terms in the calculation become zero, which is where we get E=mc². For something like a star or planet, a bunch of mass in a ball just sitting there, just using the mass and the Schwarzschild solution is good enough. You can ignore all those other terms based on how things are moving. However, with a photon, since the rest mass is zero, all those nice scalar terms drop to zero. The only thing that's left are all those terms you normally neglect. To say that two photons will experience a gravitational attraction (to each other) is an oversimplification. However, let's say that you have two photons in opposite directions passing each other. That will be equivalent (for a very short time) to a particle with a rest mass the same as the sum of their energies. A photon going nearby will follow a geodesic just as if it had passed some mass." Using this idea I looked back at E=mc^2 C is a velocity = 3*10^8m/s = Distance/Time Plugging in the necessary elements and create a contraction for 2 meters using my mass in kg would net me the amount of energy requires to achieve the 2 meter distance contraction with energy. I know you guys are not big on non-classical physics = =, this is more of a show off on my part, I apologize. I can go back to how to generate an energy source with light required for (6*10^8)^2*108 joules. Also to emphasize the part that Japanese are smart and anime are cool. P.S. And this also goes to a time machine lol, you guys can put this in theoretical science, I would not mind.
  14. Come on, just because you do not understand does not mean you defame me yo. Here is the proof by Goku(4:06). https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=063Pzii3bqk Expert note: Goku got too much energy at a stationary point(thanks Twice) and result in length contraction (4:06) because of energy(momentum)/space. After contracting the entire length of the universe he began to time travel. And then he loops past the Big bang back to his current time line.
  15. E=mc^2 C=D/T=3*10^8m/s sqrt(E/m)/(3*10^8)=1m/s plug in my weight 108kg for a distance contraction of 2 meters to solve for E sqrt(E/108)/(3*10^8)=2
  16. Because it's got an opposing or attracting magnetic field. A magnetic field is consisted of photons and a conflicting magnetic field is likely to generate EM radiation in between, I am not sure what tesla strength you need though. Well, technically speaking it's the field conflicting with the opposite pole You guys sure came a long way @@ Black body radiation hmm, I think it is less effective in generating the amount of light I need? Not sure on that @@. It could be plausible Moderator Note Which, obviously, we are not going to tell you. This is from the k-40 post, very funny Strange = =
  17. So I want to create a device that would emit visible light as a source of electromagnetic radiation. I am thinking of having two electromagnets either attracting or opposing charges that given a strong enough current would generate a strong enough opposing or attracting magnetic field to generate a light source in between. Either that or an antenna that is amped up from radio wave to create visible light waves. Which is more plausible?
  18. I want a stable source of gamma ray so I intend to filter out isotopes from a banana, how can I achieve that? I am a newbie at isotope filtering.
  19. This is extending from the falling through space time idea. I want to know why falling through space time would get me to an earlier to later time as derived from a science fiction idea. https://backtothefuture.fandom.com/wiki/Space-time_continuum "The space-time continuum consisted of all years in the past to an unknown point, perhaps the 4-digit limit set by the time machine itself." https://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Spacetime "To say that the four-dimensional continuum "exists now" implies that all cross sections "exist now" or, in other words, that the cross section t = t0 is identical with the cross-section t = t1. Otherwise, it could not exist "now." If we allow for this confusing way of thinking, the assertion that the "four-dimensional space-time continuum" has always existed and we are merely traveling through it asserts no more than the statement that the three-dimensional space continuum changes in time. ...if we call the ...space-time continuum a "reality," we are encouraged to adopt Lagrange's assertion that mechanics is a four-dimensional geometry, and to say that the four-dimensional continuum "exists now," and that therefore all future events exist now, and the "future" consists in our moving through the... continuum. But exactly as before Minkowski's formulation... we must also admit that the use of the word "now" in the formulation is rather misleading. By "now" we mean the cross section of the four-dimensional space-time continuum that is defined by t = t0. Therefore it is self-contradictory that any future instant of time t > t0 can exist "now." Use has often been made of this four-dimensional space-time continuum to "prove" that the future is "predetermined." ... The four-dimensional formulation is a useful instrument for the presentation of physical events, but it cannot be interpreted in our everyday language by simply speaking about the... space-time continuum as we have been accustomed to speak about our ordinary three-dimensional space." Phillipp Frank, Philosophy of Science: The Link Between Science and Philosophy (1957). P.S. I want more emphasis on Phillipp Frank's idea, but it does not incorporate the multi-verse theory.
  20. Based on this discussion. It is a speculation though. It is about time we understand the fabric of space time that appears invisible to our eyes but presents everywhere around us. https://www.quora.com/Do-photons-bend-space-time?fbclid=IwAR2ZZz8laRdZAc4hCUb9-mkPIyYPqBCE_oKU9nxf5kOwBnmrC5goJNd_LMo
  21. The speculation is the repelling photonic field would open a portal, or gateway to a different place. Wait for it, as my speculation conserved, please first check out this video. Please take a look at 2:45. The craft applied a technique known to computer science as a buffer attack on space time. We all thought that space time is supposed to constrict, but through a space time expansion mechanism we could apply a buffer attack and teleport some distance away. Keep in mind the craft is a radio wave antenna that generates light waves, or photons of zero mass and energy that could expand the space time. Photon exhibit a anti-gravitational property in nature. We would ask ourselves, is space time bent, or is light(photons) capable of bending space time. And if that does hold true than the repel in charges of a conflicting photonic field should theoretically expand the space time in nature, opening up a portal. Keep in mind a portal is just a continuous supply of photonic field or photons. I think my co-worker came up with the charge repel idea, likewise, a strong attraction force should potentially constrict space time and create a black hole. Earth has been a potential mix of different technologies over the years. Likewise, someone came up with this idea. Personally, I think the charge repel idea is cooler. P.S. Last one is a movie clip from Hellboy. Then it is simple. You put two electromagnets next to each other and heave them repel and charge it with very high current. And you could open a portal.
  22. If you set the charges at maxmium and attempt to repel the two charges, what would happen?
  23. Can you come up with method so we don't have to breath? Potential ideas: Kreb Cycle Red blood cells Respirocyte ATP recharge Fermentation and lactose P.S. Dang strange you close my thread too fast.
  24. Thanks for taking an interest in my post. I wasn't in the best of mind when I wrote it. Consciousness contribute to one if not two regions of the brain such as hypothalamus(we got two hypothalamus) or the pons in the brain stem. Since consciousness works like analogue you would think it is amplified over a medium, same goes for pain, pleasure, and all the other senses. So, is the "difference" in consciousness attributed to the shape of the electromagnetic field of the consciousness region. Or the difference arise from the time delay exhibit within this structure. Well the current moves very fast that it feels almost like an electric field in a sense, but if you differentiate the difference in consciousness(of two people) based on a field, well there is ought be some overlap region for the fields (sphere head or cube head). And this overlap region should attribute to the similarity between two consciousnesses, but even then you can't quite read another person's brain can you? Let you have a sphere head to read a cube head's brain or a cube head reading a sphere head's brain. So the difference in consciousness must be attributed to something else completely. If you say the frequency of the brain pulse once every second or two times every second, there is still overlap in the way this pulse occurs. So beats me, I am yet to figure out an answer. Can't two people's brain have the same frequency or pulse? There might, I wouldn't know. But then that wouldn't be two different people, would it?
  25. I mean most people die needing to breath, some organisms die without needing to breath. Most people want to die in peace, but the lack of oxygen is just torture unless you don't have to breath.
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.