blue89

My teeth are highly sensitive.(but gums are more more sensitive)

realised its reason is just brushing..

here is a new way to protect them more healthy that I thought. accordin to my opinion

"we will not brush them so frequently like before.but we will use too much toothpaste ,but only toothpaste.

we will take toothpaste ,and wait for around 5-6 minute up to 10 minute.we will not brush then."

I think brushing our teeth injures our teeth(gums) ,especially whoes teeth are sensitive like mines.and so taht we would be able to protect our gums.

I think if this is logical ,we may be able to keep them healthier ,furthermore if this is useful ,we should not care to the toothpaste's fee. (at this method we should use much more tootpaste than traditional) because it will not be more expensive than losing them ,if we lose them (any of them at real ,only one should be very valuable ) it is already more expensive to make a new one (you know implant is too expensive)

how is it ? :-)

I have tried it for a while,and only one adverse occured: my gums seems like a bit in formication.and very little sensation like feeling injured (I am unsure whether it is useful but seems so. ) ,on the other hand really it make feel fresh

what do you think about this? (I think good)

 

 

That is one of the traditional ways of getting published. You could send recordings to record companies and agents to see if any are interested.

 

There are occasional stories of people stealing the songs they are sent. One way around this would be to put the songs on YouTube and then send them a link to that. In that way you have established very publicly that it is your song prior to them getting hold of it. (This will have little legal weight, but is better than nothing.)

hımm..

but I can/would like to send a record which is naturel voice only (no instrumental addition including). I already do not have you tube acount.

Smolin had publsihed works on loop quantum gravity for sure. Loop quantum gravity is not something I know much about.

hihi

what a nice expression !..

:-)

but yes ,being honest is the best.

I intimately appreciate it.

.

Well you seem to have an interesting background .

What are you proposing ? That we can discuss .

 

actually I have some sort of solutions,but unfortunately I can/would not to propose there. because normally I would protect at least some of them , not as ordinarily discussed , I only imply that need to offer some evidences to some associations in order to prove some of my allegements.I ask your understandings, I have stated that it was required having perspective sight and not traditional ways.

the thing what I would/am able to suggest you is that we required to try something interdisciplinary.I do not mean clearly this is compulsory ,but I saw generally great scientists were not studying/being interested only to their main discipline. for instance sir issac newton was not only interested in physics ,he also was a mathematician. plato was also mathematician , but we commonly see him at philosophic literatıures,too.

these days the last one is generally extraordinary thing,it is being thought that the last example is generally unlike.

however,unfortunately the system is own supports that idea and also make it very difficult to do. but I believe that in spite of everything, surely,it should not be impossible or unlike .

probably it would be better to comply the universal truths. (not subjective ones! ,like thinking that it was required to be young to be interested in science).the universal truth: there should be given no margin relevant age to learn something)

 

It can take 3 to 6 months to get an initial response (confirmation of filing).

You then respond to this (usually explaining why it they should not have rejected it! (?) )

The whole process can take several years.

:( this is exhaustive/boring section. I also have been surprised if only confirmation itself takes 3 to 6 months. I think this literature is not convenient without me examining. I am original author of its and it will not be so easy examining.

ok. thanks to all replies as I said ,I think I should check other instructions by my own.

this is probably the ending of my questions to this thread.

That seems to be correct. You can de facto patent an algorithm in the US system, but you would need to rename it either in form of a software patent or patent it a s an approach to do something specific. E.g. you could patent a machine learning approach that does a specific task, for example. Effectively, they can be fairly abstract. The interesting bit is that while you cannot patent algorithms per se in the US, you can e.g. patent this. If you replace "system" with "algorithm" and still not be far off at all.

 

"Scientific method" is probably a bit too broad, if it includes things like scientific theories. But there are specific approaches and applied methods that could be patented (which could fall under the above example).

okay. thanks for your post. really I have been almost giving up , but here is another important point : how long does it take to be replied for our file (if we assume that the file was submitted to them)?

I would add something more, (this idea has been mentioned too much and for this reason) : I think this century is highly more modern. this means in my opinion having knowledge would be valuable. but it would be good to say that this knowledge should also be intellectual.I mean we have to find something clearly logical.

to be realistic; I don't think/believe so much to the possibility that something be invented without science, this does not seem logical.(but I see this is being spoken everywhere. and I also had read something from turkish patent institute and in my opinion some of them were comic expression)

image.jpegimage.gif

I think we might be able to find some new clues. but not via using the same methods like traditional.

I believe ,the perspective approach would be required.

good nights ..

I can not upload attachments ,is there anyone who may help me?

:-) ,probable this thread (only thread implied) would be one of the most lovely I have ever seen :-) haha look what an expression!.

"official jokes" :-)

I don't remember jus now. but the thing I can say is being lived in the past too many times

yes ,I will write there when I live again , but be sure ,because I have very entertaining personality I promise I will live.

haha my last expression also was comic

"Just forget I asked anything."

"Okay, no problem."

:) :)

1) I will be a research associate soon.

2) None of these are academic qualifications.

1) as expressed ,I will be waiting to congratulate you when you take this rank. I already think you are using generally symphatic style.

2) I have nou understood actual meaning you implied, with using this sentence but..

I have to quit now (I have taken an invitation for electric-electronic engineering faculty from ISTANBUL BILGI UNIVERSITY (MSc) ,this would be the following day(tomorrow) and I would/prepare something . thanks for nice conversation.

meanwhile , I hope a meningfull success for tampitump :-)

1)Plagiarism is really to do with the copying of actual text. In science and mathematics we are free to use the ideas of others - but we should try our best to cite the original sources.

 

However,

 

2)we all miss things and our work can get missed. This is life. I sometimes find a quick 'google' with throw up papers of interest that I would otherwise have missed. I tend to do do a literature search before, during and after writing some work.

1) I am sure ,I am already against plagiarism. if there exist some conflicts of/in undertanding , I offer reading the previous comment above.also read the step below to understand the thing that I were wondering was whether it would mean as a risk

a) you had created a literature b) you had not no enough experience ,thus you had told to someone c) you do not know the exact information whether it has been plagiarised yet but look the last step d) around those times you prepared that literature and submitted to a journal then

!!: if that journal detects that it had been published before (although you are the owner of original one!..) what would be happened ?

2) for this one I think that I need to publish at least 1-2 papers/articles to any journal to feel relax/relief :(

sometimes I also think this journal required to be an intellectual one, because as you see I would be an academcian at highly qualified universities. when I check their links written "prospective students" I just think that they are looking for someone like me: I would give/offer them some clear evidences why I thought me such good.

1)An associate degree is an undergraduate degree usually given for two years of study.

 

2)I am wondering if Tampitump has been given this as his grades are not enough to go on an finish a 3 year BSc. But I don't know that - I think this because of the question itself. Why would anyone enrole on a course that gives them a qualification they do not want?

:)

sorry for confusion,

in this case may I ask why we know someone's academic title as "associate professor" (like you are ,aren't you?)

then yes for the second one you are still quite right. my expression's result has not been changed.. :)

I already expressed any university (generally) does not give it someone without any study. and I see the system is a bit different at european countries.

probably Tampitum thought that degree had not defined his original/real profile or that degree had not expressed the quality of that programme. (this is only prediction)

hi,

I have not understood your intention (not your question(s) or expressions) (??)

once you are mentioning relevant associate degree , look the steps in science

1) BSc degree is the first step an academy

2) MSc (thesis based ) is the second step

3) PhD degree is the third step and is generally every qualified university require you to study hard up to third one

4) associate degree : this one require upper academic studies in comparison PhD

are you sure you have exact knowledge that may be relevant all theese numbered context.

1)if you implied that it should not define your quality taking any degree even if it was academic, then yes you are right.

2)but if you implied that academic degrees are unimportant/worthless, then you are quite incorrect.

this two things are separate and already any university does not give you any degree as a gift. you are studying at first how much required and ensure all requirements ,then you are taking that.

and if the second understanding is suitable to your question , ajb is quite right and also you also should thank to him for his kind explanation & symphatic reply :-) :-)

 

 

1)You just need to cite papers/articles that are relevant; it doesn't matter where they were published (as long as they are published in reputable journals).

 

 

2)Google Scholar is a good way of searching published papers: https://scholar.google.co.uk

thanks dear strange ;

really the first one seems logical. but in contrast ; the second one does not seem useful.probably there should be something more (useful) to check our literatures originality. to clarify it : I can give this example:

"ok , our litearature expected to be a new and current and also expected to be great at science society. ok this is not problem now. but I request you to think that there is enough probaility that there may exist other scientists who think like us.I am sure that I think different (like everyone).but again this should be the true : "this probability will exist evertime"

the clear thing is what I would not be relevant with Law and one word "plagiarism" . otherwise everyone will already feel no problem with their litearature for publishing. because this already their ownselves as it expressed..

One of the major points of any academic research is an understanding of the work that has gone before - you don't look for articles to cite (!) but rather you cite those articles which have helped develop your idea. Normally the first thing masters / doctoral candidate will do is an exhaustive document search and current research review - this means you know the stuff you would need to cite (in fact you know current work backwards, forwards, and any other way) and your question would not arise. You would also know whether your idea has been raised, disputed, and disproved many years before

thanks for your nice reply.

yes ,of course I know which kind material (article) I need it , but the exact question was about asking the information in which journal we would find it. and normally I thought we need to look for searching them. I would attract notice that because I would continue studying only as interdisciplinary it is being able changable from which kind of journal to cite/give references. for instance I would create some new theories, but these are related with both mathematics and sociology. in this case ,I think I will be able to cite/gicve references from journals both SCI and SSCI indexed ones.

eally I saw that you are deeply correct , yes; reading articles own may develop our ideas, this is very nice. but just in this time I am unsure whether we have to cite or not whenever we would submit article to any journal from your passage above.

really ,I do not imply you said this , I anly thought it. but it seems impossible. because I am sure the referees would want proofs why we alleged something in our articles.this is logical.

at last sentence: I would request you or others to renew the page when you/they are contacting with me at forum. I am making some faults frequently relevant grammar or forgetting something required (I mean it is being reformed by me time to time around that that time.)

hello dear scientists;

as I mentioned before times ,I have some interdisciplinary studies and some of them are article and as I understood; because of it might take longer time (taking patent) for scientific pojects ,I think it might be better to prepare the article ones.

I am sure ,some of my article schemes should be unique and newest , but again some of them might be the articles that had been created and published in the past by other scientists. (how may we be confident that it had not been published in the past) ?

this was the first question, secondly I would ask something about citing ;

-->> do we have to cite from the articles which are published at that journal (the journal which we would like to publish at it)?

(evaluate please this question for all journals (I see some of them are more intellectual & respective))

-->> how can we search convenient articles for citing; more easily than searching one by one each journals.?

thanks

hi ,

thanks for all of your nice posts ,but I were planning to send a letter by e-mail to some publishing assocciations. I thought they may help me if I send them a record. what are your opinions about this ,is this logical ?

however ,ok we may explore something just in creating music related scinece too , remember please Leonardo Da Vinci's golden ratio.

I am also planning to cite this subject in one of my article that I would make it publish.but unforunately/really this thread is more about economy.

I know basic calculus and have studied physics in high school. I think I can spare maybe some 3-4 hours daily. I'm not sure how answer that personality question but I can be patient if I need to be. I have just graduated from college and again I don't know how to answer that question on economic status.

really ,I think you have provided a little information. and because of this I will try to write only general information in common.

first of all I have alredy stated that I am analysist and and calculus is beginning of analysis (or a stage before beginning analysis) ,for instance these all these defines analysis generally stage to stage in relevancy

(1) -->> solutions for parabola and second graded equations ,trigonomtry , logarithm , complex plane , derivation and integral for only functions have 1 variables

(2) -->> calculus ( * )

(3) -->> limits and its variety for several variabled functions

(4) -->> derivation and integral for several variabled functions & sequences

(5) -->> euler integrals and forms & solutions

(6) -->> topologic convergence and divergence , relations with various of functions and being continuous , compact & T1 &T2 &T3 (spaces)

(7) -->> general topology & relations (note: topology is not separate from analysis at real,this is new department)

(8) -->> beginning spaces , metric ,normic , inner product integral & other spaces and speacial forms for convergency (divergency) (optional)

(8) -->> measure theorie (Lebesgue integral form) , and progress (upper) (optional)

(8) -->> complex forms ,analysis on complex plane , cauchy-riemann equations ,laurent series and progress (upper) ( optional)

(9) -->> MsC & PhD doctoral programmes (optional)

but I see you would be more intersted in physics (not mathematics) ,in this I request you to provide us more information about your current knowledge like I written.

for instance you may make a simple map like this.(your knowledge)

-->> high school's physics (calculating simple electric circuits,condensers, optics and computings,lenses ..etc)

-->> newton principles and its effects (includind calculations)

-->> electric intervals and forms

-->> magnetism (e.g.amper principle)

-->> optics and photoelectrics

all these are generally stage to stage in physics and most of them (except the first one) probably will require you using " progressive integral forms" and some more difficult techniques (eg. using "right hand" principle is generally not so easy in my opinion especially it was difficult when I were studying for amper theorie/principle.)

all these subjects and making improvement are not so easy exactly. this means you need to be closely ,quite patient. as I implied I am probably not same other scientists, thats why I do not need someone to tell me almost all and related these subjects and progress for learning. (intimately I have experienced it too many times)

I implied that I have (probably) some different features in my previous comment.look please according to my own principles all these features in personal characters will affect directly at background (but because of appearance of its silence , it is generally not being thought that it affects ,it is probably being thought it affects a very little and indirectly) ,ok you may accept them only my belief if anyone thinks so ,too.

-->> ambition ( ) -->> patience -->> nerve&anger (!) -->> irritation & aggression (!) -->> happiness ( :-) ) -->> relief & comfort ( )

unfortunately economic status is very important.and also I think one of the most important parameter. I had lived too much strict problems and still live

finally ,some other features are take importance too, to be realistic. for instance when I speak with someone I quite think that he/she should understand at one/first time , then probably someone do not know this point too , because I am sure I can understand at only one/first time. if someones repeat the same thing this make me anger and especially sometimes I shout them why they are repeating the same thing.(My mother is uneducated ,she repeats ame things many times and really I live too much difficulty) I also observed that this complaint is densely related/relevant to educational status but really the quality of education is also effective.

I don't trust that there is necessity to someone telling to those ones who would like to learn something in science. (it is clear for me) ,your timely expression seems enough ,but I recommend that you read all this text in relevancy, as a whole picture.

good lucks

blue.

really I do not know your level, you had better shoıw it especially whats you know.

I am mathematician (analysist) and I think especially some parts of physics are more difficult than subjects in content of mathematics. and it is clear that mathematics -physics have too much relation(s) each among subjects in their contents. and sometimes have similar or mutual rules/principles.

probably I have extraordinary features, and I request you to let us learn your level. then it might be better to make some useful suggesttions.I also recommend that you add other related statements such as how much time you may study daily for this, how kind personality you have (relief or aggressive) , how old you are and what your economic status is.

note please I can give only direction tutorial and with extreme probbaility my offers would/could be different in comparison other mathematicians and physicists.and it would be good to express in addition : (I think) I am not expert at any subject of physics currently now.

hi cute young :-)

it is not important other's feelings on your appearanca at real. the most important thing is your health .

it means ,if you do not have any complaint , it should not be problem. (note: my height is :170, weight is: ~ 60. in comparison with you,yes you seem a bit weak.)

NOTE: I thought this forum is more about scientific conversations, then (I think) you had better go a doctor(to take assistance) rather than opening a thread there.)

have a very healthy life

NOTE: any question has not been detected!/found!..

hi,

I am functional analysist.

this theorie simply is being evaluated at functional analysis (rather than real analysis (measure theorie (!) , I would request you to remember that functional analysis own (especially sometimes) will contain (already) real analysis. in other words , already mathematics own has a very different language/spesification in comparison with other parts of scence.

ok. (I would express (only) cantor theorie and how to find its proof.

cantor theorie says ;

 

if any function is continuos at a closed interval. -->> it will be regular continuous at that interval.

proof.

binali musayev,nizami mustafayev ,murat alp; analysis III . (this source is not written in english language)

NOT: the relation with functional ananlysis is just assessments own. (the proof at above is being told using metric spaces' Axioms/spesifications.otherwise it is already related basic analysis. (not progressive to functional analysis or real analysis)

related phrases and explanations relevant key words.

1) remember please ,being closed & opened & margin values & limit values & compact ..etc. are all being assessed at both topology and functional analysis.

2) any functional analysist would be highly interested in whether any space/interval is complete or not. (this is too much important. and it is not important which space it was ,e.g: Lebesgue Space ,lp or lq (1/p+1/q=1) , c,C[a,b],integral space , or other new spaces (like mines ,I am trying to create a new one!) ..etc.

4) I recommend that you check these words : lipschitz, cauchy sequences, functional (cauchy) sequences,linear&nonlinear ,convergence, divergence.

(all these are basic at real)

regards.

However, the science and mathematics itself is not copyright.

...

If you have some invention, even if it is more in the prototype stage, you may be able to get a patent. But they are expensive - you need to think if you will make any money from this. If you only have some loose ides then you will not be able to get a patent.

I think I have already explained everything that this would not be intended being loose idea. to create something useful (to be respectiveI ,this will already be required. this is not discussion. but the quite important thing : I would give emphasis that experiment/observation would be compulsory to be able to speak how it was. (loose , useful , great,..etc).

it seems I should reserach by my own. I will read related instructions on the net. thanks for our scientific conversation up to now.

It is unlikely... so you have invented something else - or why would you be asking about patents?

patents ,because ecancermedicalsceince journal's kind editor offered me ..

but she added ; some journals may have some protocols to protect your ideas (copyright

)( everyone is speaking that this would be more about patent..I am young scientist and still do not know every procedures in relation or currency)

If you have some new invention related to ultarsound machines, then you may be able to patent it.

I don't have any experience in this at all. All I do know is that you cannot patent science or mathematics - only inventions.(?) (!)

hi dear symphatic friend;

do you believe that anyone might invent a new sample shape of "ultrasound machine" only by himself/herself own??

I think this will generally be impossible.this is interdisciplinary study and collaboration will be required (collaborate with at least a doctor + engineer/scientist(mathematician+physician+engineer (eee or like ce) or other related ones))

my principle

the literature's own or numeric numbers are not so important exactly in my opinion, I think we need/should to explore something useful/efficacious to people. (universai/not partial) then we can only be respective/genius via using this information!..

then,I think you may miss some details, think please we would like to create a new useful(applicable) theorie ,but we are not engineer ,we are mathematician or physician (scientist) ,how will we be able protect it??