blue89

 

have you written any academic paper...

 

 

 

No.

this was important question ,and will be recorded in my mind. dear strange I mean the experience is very important. but of course I have not had enough information to speak about your experience. I am generally unable to follow all member's comments ,I mainly concentrate on the interpretations that are being communicated with me.do not forget please every people are very valuable in my opinion...(there is no high relevancy ,this is only one of my principles.)

all the best

If the [expert in the field suggested] you didn't have a good enough background to understand how your idea fits in and you should do some background reading I would recommend following that advice.

 

read please your comment above without seeing the part given in paranthesis and in bold at first. then ,yes this is definitely correct!..I support it ,and I definitely agree.

but if you read as normal , I would say repeatedly that he did not know all qualifications and/or specifications about my personality.

and I couldn't understand clearly your last sentence, could you clarify what was your idea ,for instance did you aggree my last expression.(did you believe that I were insuficient. (I am already pertaining to criticism))?

thanks.

renew please your page. sorry for some faults. I am a bit careless

!!: TO EDITORS & MODERATORS! ..

I recommend that it be a requirement for evry member who enrolled to this forum that they show their all degrees and degree programmes.

or at least their interest includind evidence(s) if they have any experince in the past of their life.

unfortunately I am being unable to reach the best information about their knowledge or statue at science when I check their profile.

this does not mean any problem. but I believe this would make it easier to better take assistance and to communicate for each us

unfortunately and sadly I don't believe that it would be possible to solve . because people are not aware the importance , especially who are uneducated ,or not so intelligent. I think they are bad/careless/unintelligent who did do these.

*** they are igniting forests every year epecailly in summers.(this is very bad. and this behavious is quite unintelligent (I don't want to be impolite ,but this is also...)

I dont know enough about this, but u.s.a. seems like a nice country, we know that this country contains rain forests or wider forests ,but the forests that exist there are still available and good.(I mean they protect it effectively)

if you are asking some scientific solutions ,then I think maybe it might be possible to create required gases at laboratories. but I am realistic ; I don't believe that it would be as original as Naturel , and I also think it would be expensive...

as a result ,I surely want to say that people who are igniting forests , are definitely not clever...

As ever...

:-) this expression is sympathic just as ever.. ok. follow below please. (both you & Klaynos and strange)

1) Strange's idea

After all, all sciences rely on mathematics so it would seem to be the sociology aspect that is more ... specialised / relevant.

2) Klaynos..

I'd agree with this...

3) ajb ..

My feelings are that as an applied work a journal in sociology maybe best.

I have been a bit surprised really. because I believed that any mathematical/computational journal would be happy for such studies. (this will be probably the newest sample in my opinion,but of course I have not combed enough all related arrchives.)

in this case ,I would remind this to you as to take the most clear responding from you.

do you think that any suitable journal which is concentrated on SOCIOLOGY will understand theese key words explanations and in use:

" closed /open interval , continuoum , complex functions , laurent series , some theories (e.g. bolzano weierstrass , eisenstein criterion, galois groups , transcendant , ...etc" (Note please I don't mean that all these would be used , but it is probable,and these are templates.)

**** a reply to klaynos (this question contain valuable thoughts/details in my opinion ,especially if I think true.)

Klaynos says ;

.. A)You know that there are loads of interdisciplinary fields in modern science right?

B)That in itself isn't terrible new or interesting.

A) yes of course ,and I also believe that this would be the best! (as expressed)..but probably I had spoken with inconvenient type of scientist at a time,he was associate professor at sociology. and he advised some difficult thinks to do , he said "you should read some books at first before beginning (via showing some thick books. he said that it would be impossible to take acceptance without doing this before beginning!..,(I have not said him this one , but really I thought he had not had enough infıormation about my personality ..for insance ,I am giving high importance to CULTURE (this is one of the most important definition/value for me!.. Hımm ,furthermore I understand the sociologic articles ,this are not so difficult to understand ..as a result I have not understood clearly what he implied (!).)

B) I expressed that this would be the best type of academic study in my belief. and I do not think that I am alone. although Leonardo Da Vinci ,Newton ,Tesla ,...

others did do this (but as you see these scientists are respective .) I do not think that I am alone just at this century.

hımm what is my opinion??

I believe / think ,these scientists were studying enough hard (and also very hard at real) . and of course I surely believe that this would be required.but we should not miss an important point : we also need to have ability to think perspective (maybe a bit or quite different in comparison other scientists)

thanks up to now.

 

 

No.

 

But presumably you have studied papers related to the topic(s) you are hoping to publish. What journals were they published in? That would seem a good way to find suitable places to submit.

really as I said ,this will be an interdisciplinary article , therefore this means there will exist refernces from two disciplines.

May I ask something;

you have said that you had almost no formal degree (except BSC) but in contrast general ideas ,I saw that you expressed you are/were able to earn good amount of money. ok, thats very nice.

your some persona characters might be similar to mines. (it would be better you to look my profile to understand well). I think you have writte some academic materials (papers) ,yes we live the real life, and this century is modern in my opinion ,this means that we already have to study at science even if we be intelligent.

of course these are my thoughts.and these are convenient in relevancy each them. but again I would ask you to confirm it

have you written any academic papers??

I imagine a paper that involves mathematics and sociology would be best suited to a sociology journal. After all, all sciences rely on mathematics so it would seem to be the sociology aspect that is more ... specialised / relevant.

 

To put it another way: a sociology journal will be quite used to seeing mathematics in papers , but a mathematics journal might find sociology quite unusual.

:-) I like you Strange

but are you sure?

and have you checked it carefully ,I have checked/read (already) some related articles from SSCI indexed journal's arrchives., and unfortunately I think SSCI indexed journal's referees can be very exhausted to evaluate it ,and almost I think sometimes that it can be impossibly difficult or seems like extremely improbable to evaluate it for SSCI indexed referees ..

but again I may say that I am still very new at science ,the most clear point that I can give you about me is being highly demanding to create some solutions or some new scientific reports

hi;

I am trying to prove some allegements interdisciplinary ; but with extreme probability the interdisciplinary relation would be a new generation. because these interdisciplines would be

mathematics - sociology

I do not know which type of journal to choose (SCI or SSCI )

there exist some clues to make you better understand for rsponding.

-->> in literature some formulas and techniques will probably be strict for any social journals

-->> in contrary the first clue (above) big amount of references will be given from SSCI indexed journals.

-->> principles , formulas and techniques will be coordinated under convenience of mathematics.

Regards.

1)

 

i am so confused ...

 

2)

lagrange's interpolation formula
newton raphson method
bisection method
eulers method
newtons forward
runge kutta method
trapezoidal rule


and i dont have one text that explains it all ...

all these cannot be told at forum (because of their wide content (but basic)), the best way to do is having any litearature to learn these , but these are not so difficult subjects...(&basic)

you can find almost all of these subjects with details at any numerical analysis ((suitable)book) for BSc students.

hi , really I could not find the best expression of your query to be questioned.but I suggest that you check this rule in mathematical science at first (please) (whether you are missing this point (!))

examples cannot be accepted as proof to prove allegements in mathematics. but we can use example to make/create contradiction (if contradiction exists (at real)) compare please ;

 

"if you say ; all peaople are generous " and then if you want to make contradiction (because ,you think this is not true )) ,then it would be enough to give at least one opposite example (a penurious person) to refute it. but if you want to show any allegemnt like above was true ,you cannot use giving example that comply/approve allegement. this will never be solution type. you can use some determined techniques (and this are already familiar at real ,and not so many) . induction , proving directly...)

okay. I have already not had any additinal question , (if someone wishes help ,I think I may help at that external subjects,but I do not need and therefore ,I will not open,sorry)

thanks for your notification @swansont

and good luck with.

blue89

 

 

Unfortunately, in the real world there is no such correlation.

 

I am afraid that I never studied very hard and, as a result, have almost no formal qualifications. But I get paid rather well!

Strange

 

 

Unfortunately, in the real world there is no such correlation.

 

I am afraid that I never studied very hard and, as a result, have almost no formal qualifications. But I get paid rather well!

ok. probably my expression was not enough tidy. but again I may say that this two allegement are not same.

1) if someones study the more, they will earn the more.

2) you can earn much money even if you don't study hard.

there is already no contradiction between these two alegement.

look earning much money may be related with these qualifications ,too.

1) it may depend on intelligence.

2) it may be yes related luck!

3) personality

4) beauty

renew please your page.

and check please all these descriptions are genrally have quite separate things in the content of each them.

*** happiness *** richness *** intelligence *** hardworking *** peace ***ambition. *** knowledge *** beauty

This sounds like another topic. Start a new thread if you want.

good afternoon!..

unfortunately ,I will not do this.

I will try to publish at least one or two article at first. because I want to give any evidence to talk about this. (ok,I will also try to make publish any journal which I think suitable)

but actually this does not mean that I am unstable at that idea.I only want to respond or show this officially and with evidence.

please do not forget this ,I do not say pure matehamticians are not studying hard. I already approve/accept that they are studying hard. (in my BSc I was studying very hard really)

but also I claim if someone studys hard ,he/she should earn more.

but I am unsure whether you realised it ,there is clear contradiction according to this idea.and this is three times I am implying just at this thread.

now ,I am combing out and reading articles..for reference & citation.

it is already clear that you are studied hard to prepare all papers ..when I looked only two of them..

really this was not discussion.

I succiently meant studying hard ang gaining money may be sparate.

check please : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Niels_Henrik_Abel you should heard this one.

I apology if I gave any hurts even if it was very little.

speaking thats..

Sending something like a proposal for a PhD project is nothing at all like sending a paper to Nature!

ecancermedicalscience said to me ,that some journals may have suitable protocols to also publish projects.

other subject was that ..

I believe mathematicians who are studying only pure mathematics ..might be incorrect.

they are studying hard and harder generally in comparison other scientists.

but they are not gaining so rational money. I don't imply their willingness there.

but I imply the ability.

don't you still agree this idea.??

I am going out. the time is 23.33 p.m and I am still at library ..

far away from my home.

yesterday I slept only around 3 hours

but I generally sleep around 4 hours or if I am luck at any day I am sleeping up to 6-6.30 hours.

I will express one thing while I am leaving.

I don't know the exact information but I think someone who has published over or around 10 papers at sci indxed journals , he/she may be a professor at turkey.

because I know the compulsory (but enough) requirement to be ass.prof aor asociate prof. is to publishing only one paper at any sci indexed journal

....

good nights.

LOL... you will learn in the world of publishing it is never quite that simple. I am sorry, but you are comming across so naïve and not showing much humility. You are young and full of yourself, I accept that.

 

 

ok ajb. intimately I had not tried to imply something ..(may make hurts someone.)

but remember please the ratios I gave at the first page ( any professor was gaining how much money : comparison with a professor who is mathematician and any professor who was a professor at medical science. (this is not for ass.professor ,just it is convenient to speak about professors too)

you are missing there exist unscrupulous numbers with cmparison money.(I know something more)

...

I am unsrure but ...if ..

if it will be the best way to make you undestand ,I may send you the project's shape which had been sent to harbard gsas.

but plesase don't forget. this is not promising.

only thinking now...

and think..

be sure.

If I was not sure that it was containing great context in it ,I would not send this respective university.

and in addition ...I have something more.

really I have been a bit tired. today I have had toefl exam..

1)They reject about 92 or 93% of the papers they get...

 

 

 

 

2)Thats a different question... but it maybe the case that once you have one article published you stand a better chance of getting another accepted. I don't know and it does not matter as you have not published in Nature before.

1)I think if nature is an intellectual journal, then this journal should accept such contents!.( I am also sure on this subject, I recommend that you follow nature's posts on facebook or follow nature as alert. their posts and e-mails show us that they are willing to be interested in useful scientific developments especially whiches are great.)

2) ok. I would get published articles only whiches are offer useful expressions ,or usefuld techniques.

we missed to speak of an interesting question.

Nature is sci indexed. but the article which I was thinking to make publish at this journal was interdiscipline between

mathematics-sociology or

mathematics-ethics.

and as you see this probably will be a newest type of literature.

but there the exact question is how to choose such papers in which journals ,sci or ssci.

ssci indexed will never understand properly. because I am generally using topologic theories.

Also with Nature, be aware that they publish only 7 or 8% of the papers sent to them. Just playing the numbers game here, I think your chance of acceptence is low.

 

could you clarify your expression given in bold above plese, I saw this twice interior of this conversation. and have not understood well what you implied.

did you imply that I have been teasing ..

really this is incorrect!..I am series.

The usual thing to do is look at your bibliography and see what journals your refrences appear in. Go for one of those - that is my honest advice.

this is also unclear on what have been mentioned , which of these have you wanted to imply;

1) you should check references whiches will appear at your paper

2) check your bakground please ,if you have not published any paper at nature yet,you will probably be extremely unable to get publih paper at nature.

if your implication was the first one ,then yes you are definitely correct!..

if it was the second one then ,I do not think it would be logical

and..

yes I believe you are speaking honestly,there is no matter on this idea..

renew please the page.

I have not said that. Only that the usual thing to do - and as you have no experience this maybe very helpful - is to discuss drafts of the paper with experts. Maybe there is someome at your university that can offer you direct help?

no , I do not need them at first I am already hardworking (as I said) and as a second repetation: as I have given both on my profile at this forum and on my facebook profile

I have ability to study/work individually I mean I already do not need them.however yes they are not willing to help anyone there in turkey generally. they do not want to behave as out of system's rules.

. and I would continue studying hard.

My goal is to be efficacious to humanity ...via creating developments at science. be sure I have a very creative personality.

dear ajb, really I already love almost everyone (with no difference religion,gender nationality and economic status)

okay I still have had economic problems and as I said I would keep studying hard.

I have experienced too many events whiches are related ethics directly.

I am sure I am inteligent and will try to preapere my papers

I have these lackness now

I don't know how to use LaTeX now.

I don't know how to use grapphics under convenience of nature's literatures.

I mean I am asking whether it will take a long time to learn using these programmes.

really I can't understand ....why you are so sure that in prediction of taking rejection...

I can't understand ..

why will not I be enough to prepare my article by my own..?

could you give some proofs more clearly..(?)

and I am unable to differ whether what related the contradiction with..

once you will read articles enough

then you will claim your allegement

okay you will use enough fererence and good citation ..

and what is any alse requirement..

I intimately can't see the the proof why you are being so sure me to take rejection.

You should show a full version to some experts in the subjects you write about ....

 

sorry ,I will never do this!.. thats why I fear from plagiarism. in my opinion the best thing would be submission when it be ready.

but ..I see you are warning me from the risk of taking rejection in this case ;

okay yes this is not good thing and will not make me happy ,but:

did you mean any sanction if I take rejection?? (e.g. being impossible anymore if nature rejects)

and..

I could be wrong and your work is a game changer and opens up new things... but in all honesty very few works are actually like that.

I am sure while studying at (pure) matheamictics is difficult (takes large amount of time) ,it does not provide mathematicians earning so much money ...(look this sentence contain highly contrast and strange problem!..(why in case you are studying hard ,you are not able to earn enough money?? compare in turkey I heard 6 year ago that any ass.professor doctor at medical science (medicine) were earning over 30.000 turkşsh liras (circa: 10000$) at istanbul university ,any mathematician whoa are ass..professor dr. (just like you) were earning only 2800 turkish liras (circa: 900$)

medical scientists (ass.prof.dr) earn : 10.000$

mathematical ass.prof. earn only 900$

isn't there any problem? ..and remember please mathematicians are intimately study hard. Iam sure!.

my opinion: we need to create or make mathematics useful. -->> this will make it valuable

**************

dear ajb ;

I think you are missing something , look

I believe , the papers in how ratio be useful (contain useful techniques/ways ,it will mean how it is great.

you are missing only this point ,or else as I expressed at facebook ,I surely believe that you studied hard at last at one of these education levels

MSc & PhD

******************

but regrettebly and unfortunately ,writing difficult papers and writing useful papers are separate

pure mathematics is generally useless at this century

The fact is Nature is very very very difficult to get published in. It is a real achievement to get a paper accepted in Nature. That is why I think - given your background and experiences - that you are aiming too high.

I for one do not expect to ever publish in Nature - they are not really interested in maths.

you can be sure ,I can predict both these two points and ...

yes ,when I opened account at nature ,yes I saw this that there were no information of mathematics in their interest list.

but predicted they would be interested to publish useful (intellectual) papers.

however ,I think generally physicists know methematics and the raito of this mathematical knowlegde level is changing. hımm the thing what I may say ,the physicists who are writing at nature may have qualified mathematical knowledge. (I saw this when I looked their one literature)

 

 

IF = Impact Factor

 

 

thanks for this. okay this seems useful or logical factor at all (although I do not know the complete content of this term now)

You do not seem to understand how difficult it is to get published in Nature. And since you have no experience here, I would suggest that other journals are more sutiable.

 

For example, how many papers in the bibliography of your paper are published in Nature? Also, Nature does not tend to publish mathematical works in general.

sorry,I think this is illogical reason. think these examples :

1)anyone cannot be born as a great scientist ,2)there should be at least any option like this for new candidate whoes would be great at science (or whoes would create new useful formulas / new developments at sceince.

I mean this should not be related whether you have published any paper at that journal or not. but in my opinion the content of its must be the most important (impact factor)

I would emphais repeatedly that this is my own opinion ...please do not hesitate to criticize , I alrady trust this two scientists (Charon Y and ajb) that already they will not insult anyone. it is clear that you are series and I am being happy with communication (ajb is already friendly).

probably communication would be useful at such subjects. (and you can trust me that I have good manner)

I do not agree albert einstein at just this subject.

renew please your page.

IF

sorry,I don't know this,what did you mean via using this word.?

here are two important points

1) charonY says

The cost for publishing is entirely the decision of the journal and is absolutely independent from IF.

2) ajb says

I have never paid for a publication to appear

I think there are some strange facts ; at firs editors are spending their times ,I mean they already deserve that fee ,this is separate that I do not afford now this, but for instance when I sent my abstract to editor, she asked this is open access journal ,but we aks the author whether they are able to pay. if not ,we do not require ,but i,f they would we take payment. would you pay?

I said unluckily I can not now, but if I be richy one day ,probably I will donate volunteerly. look please

mathematical and physical literatures (especially pure ons) are not easy literatures at realty , you can check ajb's ... and probably this point make it difficult to evaluate and take longer time from general other parts of science.

at final I would respond the two implicational question (I see)

1) ajb ;

To be honest, I would forget Nature as place you try to submit your first paper. Unless others who know your work - say PhD supervisor or something suggests it. As you are maths focused I am also doubtful that Nature is that interested,

charonY

But really, Nature at this stage would almost be clearly a waste of time. It is basically trying to compete in an olympic marathon without knowing the route nor, in fact, which shoe to wear.

I have not clearly understood what you implied ,but if you implied that my paper which I am concentrating on was not so great enough to be published at nature I am unable to give any detail now ; but I can say that it does not contain so difficult numeric / fomulative expressions , but it contains new clues or new alegements and I think I have been succesful at my allegements.however I may be required to use some grapphics and some formulas in LaTeX form but I am not enough at these. almost do not know how to use now..

I respect your ideas.

I think that they generally agree with other methods of ranking. The Impact Factor seems to be the one most people use. So find a journal that has publsihed the papers you are reading and rank then using IF. (Not that I like IF, but it is what people use)

 

really,the exact query/hint was not this one, I wondered that how we would learn any journal's ranking by the parameters given at that website (SJR: look there were some parameters like this : H,Q (indexed)....etc)

Some journals you can pay to make the articles avaliable to everyone. Some good journals have this option.

hımm did you mean that we may not say if any journal requires high payment for publishing ,then we will NOT be able to say at least this one would be better than any other journals (especially which is open access)

really Although I have asked this, I think this question is own is not so logical. but we know that editors will be a bit tired only with assessment of articles. especially physical and mathematical articles are will be strict in my minfd.

however I see Nature contain well designed pictures ,grapphics and some related other appearnce. but still I am not enough to speak about the content.

and probaly it would take very long time to submit to this journal for first time (prediction is almost over than 1 - 2 years. (for first time/one))

I allready asked experts in conferences and they simple ignore me.

 

Any ideas?

forgive me , I think they are right or you had asked your question not as sufficient as you would it to be understood.

look what things I have understood ;

I am looking your topic sentence : and I think probably it is not so related with (medical ) science (or other parts of science), it seems more related with belief.

then ,of course you had given some instructions about morphology , this means yes this would be related with science (definitely!)

but I am looking your question and ...

I think this is very easy question to give answer. for instance

at first we can not refute the evolution

and secondly some types of animals already existed but now they are extinct ( we may give "dodo" as example to this)

if you were asking something relevant evolution (like asking what are the differences between mammooth and elephants) then yes that would be good question (and probably this also would be simple). but if you were asking the possibility whether the scientists will be able to create a new and real type of dinasours (just similar ones existed in the past) then

yes this would be very good question.

but of course all these are my own ideas.

please do not feel any negative sensation,I appreciate being curious at science.

hi;

I need some scientist's experiences ,my specific questions are below ;

1) do such journals care that from which (type of) journals our article's citation-references have been done

(the equivalent question is whether will it be better us to cite and give references from just that journal we would submit our articles?)

2) how the ranks are being given according to this website : http://www.scimagojr.com/journalrank.php

3) does this mean that if one journal is "open access" ,then it will not be well known journal

and I see we are able to make show all open access journals via using item on the website (given above) , but let think we found any journal by google search ,then how may we control whether it is open access or not?

thanks.

hi,

 

 

1) the journal that I had sent them abstract for controling convenience said they have had no enough protocol and they recommended me to contact with other journals (they said they could not publish project's outlines) , I am planning to send it tp nature ,in this case may I ask whether we are permitted to make any change on abstract (please assume the same thing relevant whole literature,if ...)

 

could you think this question in assumption that we made ready whole of paper ??

(paper's subject is same but abstract will be changed) (?)

(do we have this permission (may we make any change on abstract)??)