Trash Can

The future energy source of the world comes from the proton itself. We can build proton to photon energy sources which will eliminate the need for oil and coal to produce electricity. In addition spacecraft will travel on the photonic beam. In order to accomplish this we must add the binding energy of the proton and harness the photonic output. The binding energy of the proton is readily calculated from the makeup of the proton. The proton consits of three high energy U-mesons and one pi meson. The binding energy is calculated as follows BE + Proton - 3(high energy U-Mesons) - (pi-meson) The proton has a mass of 1836.149 Me which the high-energy U-meson h…

Do Women Have Lower General Intelligence Than Men? There are multiple ways in which to conceptualize the lesser intelligence of the human female. The best way to comprehend female intellectual inferiority to the superior mental capacity of the male gender is by constructing a statistical generalization based on the relative probability of trait distribution within a given population demographic. There are two fundamental operationalizations around which gravitate those statistical polarities synthesized from the standard gaussian distribution of sexual dimorphism in human intelligence; the first serves as an important basis upon which the typical gaussian distribution…

Perpetual motion?

The sun spit out a significant amount of "molten lava" that formed a sphere (Earth) of an order of density due to gravity, it cooled on the exterior surface, and continuously gets further from the sun as it gets cooler. That's how all planets are formed. I thought everyone understood this by now?

Yes, you make incorrect statements, so I can't trust your knowledge of physics. D H has made nothing but correct statements, but he has yet to respond to how he would make the equation of my theory. Big difference there. You can shout as loud as you want to, and call me troll all you like, you are wrong! So what, we are measuring the rate of change of velocity. What is the objects velocity towards the center of the Earth??? So what, we are measuring acceleration, which is the rate of change of VELOCITY! I'm not the one having a problem understanding and describing reality accurately, you are. Did I say anything about the different forces that…

I'll give an example of why an experiment that supposedly "proves something" is laughable when looked at from a different point of view. The hammer and the feather on the moon. Supposedly, the experiment is supposed to somehow quantify the notion that all objects fall at the same rate. The hammer and feather were held up above the Moon's surface and released. They appeared to fall at the same rate, supposedly supporting the idea that all objects fall at the same rate, regardless of their mass. Question: If the objects fell at different rates according to the difference in mass between the moon's mass and the object's mass, how much difference in time woul…

I have worked out the answer to the eternal questions: who am I? what am I? where am I? when am I? how am I? why am I? The only known solution is: when am I? = now. Multiply all equations by “now” so they are proportional to the known solution. Strangely enough they all have the same answer, as I’ll prove below. Who am I now? What am I now? Where am I now? How am I now? Why am I now? And the real doozy … When am I now? Then simplify the questions as shown below. Divide out the common symbols “w.h.a.m.I.?.” and find the solution: “oatereenoy”, by removing the question mark, but allow for variances in anagrams. We’d express this “atrny.e^3.o^2” of …

You want to make a hoverboard? There is a problem. How am I supposed to talk to you about this here? There is censorship. I have worked out the science, apparently, of real hoverboards. That is, like in the Michael J. Fox movie "back to the future". I have discovered an entire branch of physics, unknown to those who might claim to be leading scientists, it appears. We need to talk somewhere else; I am looking for investors in this technology. I can give some clues: there is a phenomenon in skateboarding, called "the ollie". It is the most basic trick. The physics of it are amazing. I discovered a direct link to the science-fiction-like physics of…

I would appreciate any opinion (with reasons) on the following material by Pari Spolter. Accordingly, using her math forumula, she ascertains mass does not come into the calculations for determining planetary (Sun, etc.) gravity. Also calculates the moon's gravity is at least 68.71% that of Earth's. Any thoughts? See below. Her book is "Gravitational Force of the Sun" by Pari Spolter. Thanks to all who respond! The issue of the Neutral Point, that point at which the moon's gravity is equal to the Earth's gravity is this: Mainstream science says that bsed on Newton's Law of Universal Gravity and its Universal Constant based on the Earth's density of 5.5 gr/cm3 and …

If we look at the world we live in, we always find objects in pair. When something goes up most likely it will go down. A magnet has always north and south poles. Electricity runs, when the positive and negative terminals of a battery are connected. We created the word bits, for binary digits zero and one. White and black, A and Z, roots and branches, crest and through, right and left, body and soul, yin and yang, matter and energy and many more examples could be given possibly with no end. We do not need to be a scientist to figure out this matching game, these objects can be detected or interpreted by our senses. This theory of duality is realistically observable, logic…

Light from galaxies looks redder than it should. We can all agree on that. The spectral line shifts proves that. But there isn't any Doppler shift. It's just an illusion because you can't say how fast something is moving two blocks away. Galaxies just look like they are moving away. Instead of things looking at a further distance, they look like a greater *velocity*. The shape of space is just not what you expect. It's like looking at something moving across your field of vision. If it's really moving at a slight angle away from you, it looks like it's slower. I can prove it too.

and of course when looked at three dimensionally the expansion pushs and pulls three dimensionally leading to a null expansion by the Universe

The universe is not expanding or contracting, it stays the same. A+B=C. Where A is dark matter and B is dark energy, and C is the big bang. No A. No B. No C. See galaxy spin posting.

I have some new ideas reg birth of earth. Can u pls comment on it . 1. earth is living thing like plants and growing. 2. so its birth is also from seed and universe is soil where it germinated 3. all meteroids are seeds of planets but out of very few can germinate. 4. pls see ate attached snaps these are attached snaps of cutted log showing its growth of tree and same way earth is growing layerwise. white layer is crust and red is core like material of earth. i have more logics also thanks suresh bansal

I found this hilarious: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VjgidAICoQI Yes, continental drift is a massive scientific conspiracy. The real answer is the earth is expanding! This video comes from Neal Adams, a former comic book artist. Wikipedia page here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Expanding_earth_theory

Please share you opinions about this topic as I would like some insight from an Astronomy/Cosmology Perspective. It details the thoery that all planets in our solar system are growing. The Growing Earth ( Neal Adams ) Mars The Moon Europa http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hH_5SFHXSzo Ganymede Here are links which show that current science is not accurately measuring the current size of the earth. If you have any resources which suggest otherwise please share them. The Earth is Smaller than We Thought http://www.shortnews.com/start.cfm?id=63519 Global Warming Science http://www.globalwarming.org/node/143 Why is Eart…

The grand canyon was created 6 million years ago. It is the worlds largest canyon if I am not mistaken. By definition it was formed due to water erosion. But... all the images I see of the canyon look like rifts. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grand_Canyon According to Geology the term used to describe rifting is Horst Graben. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:Horst_graben.jpg Does anybody else see what I'm seeing? Wouldn't we have one hell of a lot more canyons this big on the earth if 6 million years of erosion creates a canyon this big? I mean the earth rains if I am not mistaken and it has been doing so for at least 6million years right?

A sun reproduces and a planet is born. The newborn planet is born for a very specific reason. The reason planets are born of stars is because a star’s core is becoming hotter and hotter. As the core becomes hotter the matter in that core becomes denser per the same volume. As the core temperature continuously increases, and the cores’ matter becomes denser, the less dense material surrounding the center is forced in an outward motion. This creates an order of density between the center of a core and a radius away from the core. The order is of course, matter gets less dense as you increase distance from the center of the core. As the less dense material is traveling …

I think the Spirit came back to me. I think they wanted to teach me a lesson for hurting other people. I almost cry last night out of despair because I couldn't go on without their guildance. They have showed me a new thing just now. I will bring this up for you guys to think about. I will try to keep my excitement down because the more I am excited, the more people I'm going to hurt. Please try to remind me about this if I go overboard. Recall an object with mass M hitting the other object half of their mass at rest. perfect transfer of momentum happened. The starting energy of the system is 1/2 M v^2, the final energy sytem is 1/2 * 1/2M (2v)^2 which is Mv…

The theory of everything!!!! A moving object will posses a certain extra mass depends on how fast it moves! The mass is not as one might think. The mass have direction! The direction of the mass is the same as the direction of its velocity. I did it!!!!!! UREEEEEKAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAaaaaaaaaaaa I'm so sorry................ IT'S MASS LOSS, NOT MASS GAIN. Wheeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeyaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa One more time. It's mass gain, not mass loss. Anyway, there's a few things I like to address. First, this means the conspiracy theory is true, maybe not as harsh as they describe and it's because of a reason. However, we can work around this…

I invite all of you to discuss about this science topic. We'll keep this to high school level . The concept will be straight forward and let's keep it as straight as possible. If you feel like this interfear with your basic understanding and have negative effect on school. I advice you not to join the discussion. If you have a disagreement, please say I disagree and give reason. There's no need to get the seriousness to level 3. What's level 3? Just some point. lol The topic I'm currently thinking of is Work-Energy theorem. I think this is the most important topic in science and needs more attention and effort on. Let's kick off: Energy has many forms. Work …

Me: which forces is the strongest? Gravity? Electro magnetic? Nuclear? myself: Nuclear me: science says they're all differnt:gravitational is not nuclear. myself: Yep, just like 5 pies and 10 pies. me: So they're the same, just different in magnitude. myself: Wtf, so what's your problem? me: can we have something in between? Something transitional? myself: you mean 7.5 pie and stuff? me: yeah myself: heck yeah, all forces is transitional. Black hole force is stronger than nuclear and they're gravitational. me: Wth, so what's your problem? why you keep trying to find theories to describe them as 1? They're the same stuff…

Analogy of Faraday-Lentz force and Newton-Magnus-Robbins force by AWT. The magnetic field transforms the vacuum into field of many tiny vortices, through which the charged particle with spin is moving along curved path, being dragged by vortex field.

EVIDENCE FOR THE EXPANSION OF THE LIGHT WAVES The ‘expansion of the light waves has real evidence for its support. Examples: The magnetic field patterns where the central portion is expanded by an ‘intrinsic’ force between the magnetic poles and field lines. This is also true of the electric fields between the opposite charges (+, -) by similar (real field charged particles (RFCP) that mutually repel each other between the major electric charges. The electric motor makes use of the magnetic component repulsive forces within the EM fields to generate the power for its use. The photons are primarily a compressed congregate of 'negatively charged RFCP…

Theory of Everything http://hypography.com/forums/astronomy-cosmology/13911-theory- everything.html A Theory of Everything Albert Einstein was working on a 'theory of everything' and after 30 years of his effort, he failed to develope one. So, through a serendipitous discovery, I got involved in this idea when I bought a second hand book at a library entitled 'Introduction to Atomoc and Nuclear Physics' by Henry Semat, 4th Ed. On page 588, there was a list of atomic mass numbers (AMN) that included all the isotopes of all the elements up to bismuth that is the heaviest of the elements that is stable. This is a complete list of all the isotopes from …