petrushka.googol Posted March 6, 2016 Share Posted March 6, 2016 Can you have a hot ionized plasma trigger for a thermonuclear reaction, as opposed to the conventional fission reaction ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pavelcherepan Posted March 17, 2016 Share Posted March 17, 2016 Do you mean it like in a bomb? But with "conventional" fission trigger mechanism you do get hot ionised plasma as a result. Plus you get an added bonus of pressure holding your fusion reactants together long enough to produce a lot of energy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
petrushka.googol Posted March 17, 2016 Author Share Posted March 17, 2016 Do you mean it like in a bomb? But with "conventional" fission trigger mechanism you do get hot ionised plasma as a result. Plus you get an added bonus of pressure holding your fusion reactants together long enough to produce a lot of energy. Yes. In a thermonuclear bomb. Also can a lightning emulator be used as a trigger? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
swansont Posted March 17, 2016 Share Posted March 17, 2016 You need to get the temperature and pressure high enough for fusion to occur. A fission bomb is not a requirement, per se, it's just the way we know of to create those conditions. Lightning is not known to initiate fusion anywhere. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
petrushka.googol Posted March 17, 2016 Author Share Posted March 17, 2016 You need to get the temperature and pressure high enough for fusion to occur. A fission bomb is not a requirement, per se, it's just the way we know of to create those conditions. Lightning is not known to initiate fusion anywhere. I think lightning is a highly ionized plasma. Then it's use could be a future possibility. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Cuthber Posted March 17, 2016 Share Posted March 17, 2016 I think lightning is a very inconvenient way to get electricity. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
swansont Posted March 17, 2016 Share Posted March 17, 2016 It's a matter of how much energy it has, not just being a plasma. You need to get a system really, really hot if you want fusion to take place. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Enthalpy Posted April 6, 2016 Share Posted April 6, 2016 The inventive people at General Fusion did that, "fusion created by a plasma", but probably not at the scale the OP hopes. http://www.generalfusion.com/ In early attempts (no more described at their site), they had just strong current pulses at many places in a liquid to let a pressure wave converge to a point where D-T fusion did happen. It's just that D-T fusion is obtained in many ways, but net energy production is the difficult part. At least according to their website, they seem to be back to the acoustic implosion of rotating liquid metal, for which I had made detail suggestions http://www.scienceforums.net/topic/58924-magnetized-target-fusion/ They had gone away from that method. I vaguely suppose that fission remains the easiest way to trigger a thermonuclear bomb (which, by the way, is mainly a fission bomb, see Teller-Ulam) but some day other methods will exist and proliferation may be worse then. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now