Does it make any sense to look at time from non-beginning to non-end in a fractal sense, if we model it mathematically?

Hard to say without seeing the model ...

That's why it's a question

Since there is only one temporal dimension, any proposal can only look at it fractally in a Cantor's dust sort of way.

 

https://www.google.co.uk/search?hl=en-GB&source=hp&q=cantor+dust+fractal+dimension&gbv=2&oq=cantors+dust&gs_l=heirloom-hp.1.3.0i10j0i22i30l9.1265.3640.0.6422.12.12.0.0.0.0.156.1408.1j11.12.0....0...1ac.1.34.heirloom-hp..0.12.1408.5-hF1xKtqq4

 

does this help?

That's why it's a question

 

So you are asking if a non-existent model makes sense?

 

Is a non-existent cake delicious?

There have been fractal universe models proposed the problem with them is that they are not Lorentz invariant. This is a major problem for fractal based models.

 

"Despite the beautiful physics emerging from the HL picture, inspired by critical and condensed-matter systems, it potentially suffers from at least one major problem. Lorentz invariance, one of the best constrained symmetries of Nature, is surrendered at fundamental level."

 

here is a review of HL gravity.

"Quantum field theory, gravity and cosmology in a fractal universe"

http://arxiv.org/pdf/1001.0571.pdf

 

due to the Lorentz invariance constraints this model is largely not well considered as well as the problems mentioned in this paper

Edited July 23, 201411 yr by Mordred

Thanks Mordred