Jump to content

Archimedes force: ship with(out) cargo


Function

Recommended Posts

Hello everyone

 

Here's a question in preparation for the med school approval exam:

 

A freighter, which has a constant horizontal sectional area of [math]4,500\text{ m}^2[/math], lowers [math]6[/math] more meters into the water when it's filled with cargo. The mass of the cargo is:

1. [math]27,000,000 \text{ kg}[/math]

2. [math]270,000,000\text{ kg}[/math]

3. [math]60,000\text{ kg}[/math]

4. [math]4,500,000\text{ kg}[/math]

 

To try to solve this, I called [math]l[/math] the length of the freighter, [math]h[/math] the height and [math]d[/math] the depth. Let [math]x[/math] be the height that is under water when the freighter is unloaded, [math]V_{o_1}[/math] the volume of the freighter that's immersed when unloaded, and [math]V_{o_2}[/math] when loaded. Let [math]m_1[/math] be the net mass of the freighter, and [math]m_2[/math] the mass of the freighter, when loaded. Let then [math]F_{A_1}[/math] be the magnitude of the Archimedes force on the ship when unloaded, [math]F_{z_1}[/math] the magnitude of the gravitational force on the ship when unloaded, [math]F_{A_2}[/math] the magnitude of the Archimedes force on the ship when loaded and [math]F_{z_2}[/math] the magnitude of the gravitational force on the ship when loaded.

 

 

 

[math]\begin{array}{rcccl}V_{o_1}&=&x\cdot l\cdot d&=&x\cdot \dfrac{4,500}{h}\cdot d \\ &&&&\\ V_{o_2}&=&(x+6)\cdot l\cdot d&=&(x+6)\cdot\dfrac{4,500}{h}\cdot d\end{array}[/math]

 

 

 

[math]\begin{array}{rrcl}&F_{A_1}&=&F_{z_1} \\ &&& \\ \Leftrightarrow &\rho_{H_2O}\cdot g\cdot V_{o_1}&=&m_1\cdot g \\ &&& \\ \Leftrightarrow & m_1&=&1,000\cdot x\cdot\dfrac{4,500}{h}\cdot d\end{array}[/math]

 

 

 

[math]\begin{array}{rrcl} &F_{A_2}&=&F_{z_2} \\ &&& \\ \Leftrightarrow & & \cdots &\\ &&& \\ \Leftrightarrow& m_2&=&1,000\cdot (x+6)\cdot\dfrac{4,500}{h}\cdot d\end{array}[/math]

 

 

 

[math]\begin{array}{rrcl}\Rightarrow& m_2-m_1&=&1,000\cdot (x+6)\cdot\dfrac{4,500}{h}\cdot d-1,000\cdot x\cdot\dfrac{4,500}{h}\cdot d \\ &&& \\ \Leftrightarrow &m_2-m_1&=& 27,000,000\cdot \dfrac{d}{h}\end{array}[/math]

 

 

 

Now I'd like to pick answer A, but since I don't know anything about [math]d[/math], nor [math]h[/math], I don't think I can just pick this one.

 

Could someone help me please?

 

Thanks.

 

Function

Edited by Function
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The 4500m2 figure in the question isn't a length.

It is (confusingly) the product of the length and the depth.

So your initial equation isn't set up right.

 

But I thought: 4 500 = l * h; so x * l * d = V = x * 4 500/h * d?

With units: VO1 = (xld)m3 = (x)m (4,500)m² (d)m / (h)m = (4,500 xd/h) m³

Edited by Function
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am getting confused by the names you give to the dimensions of the ship

Let's make an arbitrary assumption (we can check it later if we need to).

The ship is 100 metres long and 45 metres wide. That gives an area of 4500 m2

It's a funny shape but...

 

What volume of water is displaces when it moves down by 6 metres?

 

How much does that volume of water weigh?

If the ship was twice as long , but only half as wide, (200 by 22.5) what would the displaced volume be?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am getting confused by the names you give to the dimensions of the ship

Let's make an arbitrary assumption (we can check it later if we need to).

The ship is 100 metres long and 45 metres wide. That gives an area of 4500 m2

It's a funny shape but...

 

What volume of water is displaces when it moves down by 6 metres?

 

How much does that volume of water weigh?

If the ship was twice as long , but only half as wide, (200 by 22.5) what would the displaced volume be?

 

Volume would be 27,000 m³, so m = 27,000,000 kg

 

Same for the other length and width. I think I get it.

Or it's a tricky question which hasn't got such a simple answer. (It's a bit too easy to be in the book I have...)

Probably my bad, but I think they could've explained it a bit better in the question what exactly is 4500 m²...

Edited by Function
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is not great wording - but I think you (and JC) have it down correct. For two reasons; firstly it is the only interpretation of the wording that gives a single answer, secondly a horizontal cross section is best interpreted as in the plane that does not have a vertical component ( ie the same plane as that of the deck).

 

FYI - these are not shipping terms. We would use the tonnes per centimetre (in this case 45 tonnes per cm) to express the information given in the question

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.