Jump to content

My Fellow Americans


George W. Bush

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 141
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Originally posted by Piccolo

Does anyone know what gass the russians used against the rebels in the recent hostage situation in a opera?

Im curious. I didnt want to post a thread just for this question.

It was a gas based on fentanyl, a strong opium-based drug used for putting people to sleep before operations.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Originally posted by fafalone

I've never heard anyone call it a bombing besides you.

 

Whatever you want to call it bomb, attack.

My point is if Saddam wanted to harm anyone wouldn't he have not done it earlier? I don't support him or anything I jsut find it interesting that all of the sudden they decide to search for weapons. If I'm correct in the Iran Iraq war didn't the the states supply Saddam with weapons. And the same with Afganistan when they where in war against Russia.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They didn't search for weapons before because Iraq refused to let them. Only now with the imminent threat of a US attack have they let them into the country, and they're now on a wild goose chase. Iraq is misleading them and racing to sanitize facilities and hide weapons before inspectors get there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Originally posted by the GardenGnome

If Saddam wanted to nuke anyone he would he have done it. Why now?

Originally posted by the GardenGnome

Look at September 11. They did not use bombs or nuclear weapons and they still refer to it as bombing the World Trade Center. So it does need to be a nuclear weapon!

Do you mean 'nuke', or just 'attack'?

 

You're confusing things! :P

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We were talking about your flawed logic that Saddam would attack if he could.

 

Why did al qaeda wait until 2001 to attack? why didn't they do it the second commercial jetliners existed? why did japan wait until ww2 to attack? why didn't every single conflict in history happen the second life formed?

 

things take time to plan and develop.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Originally posted by fafalone

We were talking about your flawed logic that Saddam would attack if he could.

 

Why did al qaeda wait until 2001 to attack? why didn't they do it the second commercial jetliners existed? why did japan wait until ww2 to attack? why didn't every single conflict in history happen the second life formed?

 

things take time to plan and develop.

 

Good point but I mean now Saddam will not attack when there are millions U.S investigators on his ass. And this whole war on Iraq will only place more hate on the west then there alread y is! Violience will not solve the problem.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 2 years later...
  • 2 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.