Jump to content

1=-1? really?


Recommended Posts

I am a bit confused by this. Here is the equation:

 

[math]

a=b[/math]

[math]a^{2}=b^{2}[/math]

[math]a^{2}-b^{2}=0[/math]

[math](a+b)(a-b)=0[/math]

[math]a=b,-b[/math]

let [math]a=1[/math]

[math]1=1,-1

[/math]

 

I understand that this cannot be true but why does it work algebraically? To my understanding, if [math] a=b [/math], than [math] a^{2}=b^{2}[/math] but if [math] a^{2}=b^{2} [/math], than [math] a\neq b [/math] What am I not understanding?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

the flaw here is basically based on this-

 

[math]2^{2}[/math] = 4; [math]-2^{2}[/math] = 4

but

[math]\sqrt{4}[/math] = 2, not -2

 

so a and b could be 1 or -1 since both [math]1^{2}[/math] = 1 and [math]-1^{2}[/math] = 1

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the trouble here arises from taking the shortcut.

 

[math](a+b)(a-b) = 0[/math]

[math]a+b = 0[/math] or [math]a-b=0[/math]

[math]2a = 0[/math] or [math]a - a=0[/math]

[math]a = 0[/math] or [math]0 = 0[/math]

 

You never get a chance to show that 1 = -1.

 

You can't jump ahead to the conclusions you made if you don't take the "shortcut" to finding solutions. The shortcut is invalid here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

well, when you square something negative it becomes positive, but when you take the square root you only take the positive

 

like you might think [math]\sqrt{(x)^2}[/math] = x

 

but for x= -2, [math]\sqrt{(-2)^2}[/math] = [math]\sqrt{4}[/math] = 2

 

as if -2 = 2

Edited by max.yevs
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am a bit confused by this. Here is the equation:

 

[math]

a=b[/math]

[math]a^{2}=b^{2}[/math]

[math]a^{2}-b^{2}=0[/math]

[math](a+b)(a-b)=0[/math]

[math]a=b,-b[/math]

let [math]a=1[/math]

[math]1=1,-1

[/math]

 

I understand that this cannot be true but why does it work algebraically? To my understanding, if [math] a=b [/math], than [math] a^{2}=b^{2}[/math] but if [math] a^{2}=b^{2} [/math], than [math] a\neq b [/math] What am I not understanding?

 

when you get to [math](a+b)(a-b)=0[/math]

you could say a=1 or a = -1 but not both at the same time.

since b=a a can't equal -b unless they're 0.

i'm pretty sure if [math] a^2 = b^2 [/math] then [math] a = b[/math]

Edited by moth
case
Link to comment
Share on other sites

i'm pretty sure if [math] a^2 = b^2 [/math] then [math] a = b[/math]

 

what if [math] a = 2 [/math], and [math] b = -2 [/math] ?

 

im pretty sure the flaw occurs because even though

if [math] a = b [/math] then [math] a^2 = b^2[/math]

it does not work backwards with

if [math] a^2 = b^2 [/math] then [math] a = b[/math]

 

because if [math] a^2 = b^2 [/math] then [math] a = b, -b[/math]

 

just like the equation he did, i can say

 

[math] a = b [/math]

[math] a^2 = b^2[/math]

[math] a = b, -b[/math]

let [math] a = 1 [/math]

[math] 1 = 1,-1 [/math]

 

of course this trick is a lot harder to find in his equation

and ignore my first two posts, both the positive and negative count as square roots, even if they're the reason for the flaw.

Edited by max.yevs
Link to comment
Share on other sites

what if [math] a = 2 [/math], and [math] b = -2 [/math]

 

im pretty sure the flaw occurs because even though

if [math] a = b [/math] then [math] a^2 = b^2[/math]

it does not work backwards with

if [math] a^2 = b^2 [/math] then [math] a = b[/math]

 

good point - i forgot negative numbers.my algebra has 20+ years of dust on it.

but a has to equal b or - b, not b and -b, right?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

that's an interesting question, yeah i guess so

 

in fact its a good way of thinking why in the beginning, a equals b only, but when he somehow gets a equals both b and -b, there must be some mistake. only way i can think to replicate it is with a number and the negative of it both having the same square.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I recall a maths lecturer taking a problem similar to this and going through it in front of the class. I'm pretty sure the initial premise of "a=b" was the problem, and wouldn't that suggest why you end up with a situation of the positive and negative answer both being equal to the same value?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[math]\sqrt{2} = \pm 2[/math]

 

See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Square_root

 

this is not true. at all.


Merged post follows:

Consecutive posts merged

I was given a very similar equation to this again today. It was exactly the same as the one in the OP except at the step where you have [math](a+b)(a-b)=0[/math], the person divided the 0 by the [math]a-b[/math], and ended up with [math]a=-b[/math] therefore [math]1=-1[/math]. Am i right about the flaw being with the division? I mean, since [math]a=b[/math], wouldn't dividing by [math]a-b[/math] be the same as dividing by zero, which is "forbidden"?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

this is not true. at all.

 

It's clear to me that Cap'n made a simple typo, and intended to show that [math]\sqrt 4 = \pm 2[/math], which is, in fact, QUITE true... and contrary to the assertion made by Max in post #2, which was challenged by me in post #3.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's clear to me that Cap'n made a simple typo, and intended to show that [math]\sqrt 4 = \pm 2[/math], which is, in fact, QUITE true... and contrary to the assertion made by Max in post #2, which was challenged by me in post #3.

 

alright, but [math]\sqrt 4 \neq \pm 2[/math]. [math]\sqrt{4}=2[/math] while [math]-\sqrt{4}=-2[/math]. the correct notation that you would need to use if you wanted a positive and negative answer would be [math]\pm\sqrt{4}=\pm2[/math]

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rubbish. Only if you restrict your definition of square root to the subset of positive roots. That's silly. Implied in the square root signage is a request for ALL roots. Unless otherwise specified, and unless a principal root is specifically requested, both positive and negative responses must be provided, not the other way around.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

the radical sign [math]\sqrt{x}[/math] is a request for the principal square root of [math]x[/math].

 

Every non-negative real number x has a unique non-negative square root, called the principal square root, which is denoted with a radical symbol as [math]\sqrt{x}[/math], or, using exponent notation, as [math]x^{1/2}[/math]. For example, the principal square root of 9 is 3, denoted [math]\sqrt{9} = 3[/math], because [math]32 = 3 × 3 = 9[/math]. If otherwise unqualified, "the square root" of a number refers to the principal square root: the square root of 2 is approximately 1.4142.


Merged post follows:

Consecutive posts merged
Oops. Yes, iNow is right, I meant [math]\sqrt{4} = \pm 2[/math], which is true.

 

Read the Wikipedia page I linked to.

 

I did, and I quoted it above.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I did, and I quoted it above.

Then you also saw:

 

Every positive number x has two square roots. One of them is [math]\sqrt{x}[/math], which is positive, and the other [math]-\sqrt{x}[/math], which is negative.

 

cameron: click on the fancy math to see how we did it. There should also be a link to a tutorial when you do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It wasn't directed at you. Also, hover your mouse over the square root of 4 symbol in quoted text of Capn's post #21 above... Click it.

 

The window which opens shows the code which generates that, and also at the bottom right is available an additional link with more information (a tutorial) on how to do it. It's calle "LaTeX," and much like using quote tags, you use "math" tags and certain codes to make it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.