[moderation]

 

Am I correct in saying that all your references in posts #22 and #24 to "above" and "again above" mean "agreed"? If so, please don't do this again, just say "agreed". Is agreeing so disagreeable that you have to mask it in confusion?

 

[/moderation]

 

no

 

above means that I have already answered the response

no

 

above means that I have already answered the response

[moderation]

 

Then please say so and either point out where you did, use the quote feature to make it clearer, or rephrase instead of reiterate (because you obviously didn't make yourself clear to the people you're talking to).

 

[/moderation]

I understood him perfectly

Besides the "above" business, what most puzzles me about north's post is where he says:

it just that you can't use space in and of itself by itself to change the geometry of a particular angle the angle can only be changed by calculation

 

As I said, it wasn't I who proposed changing a particular angle. Didn't even mention it. So to whom is North replying? And it sounds, from his tone, as if he is objecting or remonstrating. What about? Can't make sense of it. North needs to spell out his position in explicit detail.