Pangloss Posted February 11, 2008 Share Posted February 11, 2008 This was my first, telling people something they already knew. Nice way to say hello. Lol. But I got a nice reply from Martin. http://www.scienceforums.net/forum/showthread.php?t=5903 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
the tree Posted February 12, 2008 Share Posted February 12, 2008 http://scienceforums.net/forum/showthread.php?t=11794 My first thread, surprisingly unembarrassing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Klaynos Posted February 12, 2008 Share Posted February 12, 2008 This was my first, telling people something they already knew. Nice way to say hello. Lol. But I got a nice reply from Martin. http://www.scienceforums.net/forum/showthread.php?t=5903 I remember reading that thread just after I joined... I had forgotten it was you though! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sisyphus Posted February 12, 2008 Share Posted February 12, 2008 Mine: http://www.scienceforums.net/forum/showthread.php?t=16023 I had a question, YT had the answer and his impatience, and eventually I goaded him into explaining it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Severian Posted February 12, 2008 Share Posted February 12, 2008 It does work, because the sort by part of the query is processed before the limit. IOW, it orders all the search results in the set before it selects and returns the first 1,000 of that set. That make sense. I was searching first and then reordering. Using your method turned up my first post (though from my comment, it looks like there was an earlier post which was deleted): http://www.scienceforums.net/forum/showpost.php?p=73483&postcount=25 Hi guys - sorry about the post above (I wanted to check if I could post, thinking I would edit it, but can't find the edit button.....(I can be a bit thick sometimes)) Anyway, I wanted to comment that 150 is a little unfair. First of all, the extra particles are not particles in the Standard Model - they are particles introduced by Supersymmetry. Supersymmetry introduces a new particle for every particle we have in the Standard Model: for every fermion we get an extra boson and for every boson we get an extra fermion. If I remember correctly the Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model then has 123 particles (or thereabouts). But that is not very fair either because supersymmetry has also introduced a new fermionic 'dimension' into the game, and the new particles are really just the component of the old particles in the new femionic dimension. So they are really just different facets of the old particles and not new ones at all! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
john5746 Posted February 12, 2008 Share Posted February 12, 2008 My first post - a musing about QM, before I was endowed with the complete mastery of the subject. http://www.scienceforums.net/forum/showthread.php?p=69185#post69185 My first thread, unfortunately it is still news worthy http://www.scienceforums.net/forum/showthread.php?t=5225 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ecoli Posted February 12, 2008 Share Posted February 12, 2008 Not my first post, but my first scientifically relevant post, in the forms of a physics question. http://www.scienceforums.net/forum/showthread.php?t=7738 My first actual post was saying that I wanted to cure cancer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now