I watched a video titled '25 Simulation Theory Facts That Will Make You Question Everything'

Among them were Planck scale (the smallest measurement in the Universe) being the size of a pixel

Black holes being maximum file size of an area

String theory having Computer error correction code equations

So this all got me thinking. Maybe someone out there could find what Gravitons would be analogous to in a computer matrix FIRST then find the natural counterpart.

Edited Sunday at 05:51 PM3 days by HawkII

2 hours ago, HawkII said:

Planck scale (the smallest measurement in the Universe)

That’s not what Planck scale is. We can’t come anywhere close to measure Planck time or distance, but the Planck energy is about 2 x 10^9 J, which is pretty big in the human experience view.

The Planck scale is where quantum effects of gravity would come into play.

So this all got me thinking. Maybe someone out there could find what Gravitons would be analogous to in a computer matrix FIRST then find the natural counterpart.

I don’t see how this brings anything extra to science. A computer simulation would be based on equations, i.e. we’d already know how they would behave

I have chills;

I've gone and done half of what I set out here.

As we know. If Gravitons are real. People rekon Gravitational waves are made up of Gravitons.

Gravitational waves go across through things, slightly raising them as they do so, then those things go back to original position after is passes.

...

Cast your mind back to Video tapes.

The artifact you are thinking of is called a tracking line (or tracking noise/error).

When a VHS tape plays, a horizontal band of fuzzy static or a wavy, distorted line appears across the screen—often near the top or bottom. Because of the way analog video aligns, this line creates a distinct "tearing" or "warping" effect that looks like it is physically raising, bending, or curling the image right above or below it

Gravitational Wave passing Earth | Animation

VHS Tracking Effect Tutorial [After Effects]

Edited Monday at 10:14 AM3 days by HawkII

I'm making some real head way on this.

As so often the case, people here are free to join in.

Check this out.

Graviton properties

1. Charge: Zero electric charge.

2. Spin: Spin-2 (meaning it turns twice before looking the same).

3. Mass: Zero rest mass in standard theory.

The Helical Scan: VHS players read video using magnetic heads on a rapidly spinning, tilted drum that sweeps diagonally across the moving tape.

Massless particles with quantum spin, like photons and the hypothetical graviton, possess a property called helicity.

a helical scan has helicity in both the literal, geometric sense and the mathematical physics sense.

All the squares of Spacetime could be represented as the square frames of the reel of the video tape. Could explain the Gravitons near infinite range and speed of light.

Spacetime squares. Frames on tape

First problem, among the many misconceptions and ignorance of science ...
Gravitons don't spin.

Not once, nor twice, not axially or helically.
Not at all; they, if they exist, would be point particles.
The 'spin' is intrinsic, and a measure/consequence of quantized angular momentum.

1 hour ago, HawkII said:

As so often the case, people here are free to join in.

No, thanks.

Time's running out people. I've almost finished this all by myself.

Yes, videotape distortion can look strikingly similar to gravitational lensing, though the physical mechanisms behind them are entirely different.

When a physical videotape is stretched, melted, crinkled, or undergoes severe tracking errors, it causes a specific analog artifact known as "flagging," "tearing," or "skew distortion."

In action

Alright. We're done here. It's been a wild ride.

The Video Tape is the two dimensional surface.

The Video Header is the Graviton. The cone. The Gravitons are the projector.

The picture and sound on screen is the 3D universe

The holographic principle states that the description of a volume of space can be encoded on a lower-dimensional boundary, meaning our three-dimensional universe and gravity may emerge as a holographic projection from a two-dimensional surface

Holographic Universe

Edited Tuesday at 11:52 PM1 day by HawkII

Cumulus narwhal icosahedron pinky. Rhizome elocution wisp?

You’ve “discovered” that oscillations act like oscillations.

I’m curious - who are you quoting in your posts? These should be attributed to their source.

7 hours ago, TheVat said:

Cumulus narwhal icosahedron pinky. Rhizome elocution wisp?

Rude.

6 hours ago, swansont said:

You’ve “discovered” that oscillations act like oscillations.

I’m curious - who are you quoting in your posts? These should be attributed to their source.

I don't know what you mean by that.

Google AI

Gravitons fit into the holographic principle as emergent quantum excitations of spacetime rather than fundamental particles moving through a pre-existing container

No Fundamental Point Particles: Instead of fundamental point-like gravitons bouncing around a background geometry, spacetime itself and the gravitons within it are reconstructed from quantum entanglement on the surface.

13 hours ago, HawkII said:

I don't know what you mean by that.

All oscillations have common behaviors, which is why you can describe them with equations.

It should be utterly unsurprising (the opposite of a revelation) that you see similar behavior.

13 hours ago, HawkII said:

Google AI

Which violates rule 2.13

Again and again,want to find graviton?...go to/look at super and I mean super dense regions...

1 hour ago, MJ kihara said:

Again and again,want to find graviton?...go to/look at super and I mean super dense regions...

Of certain people’s brains?

1 hour ago, exchemist said:

Of certain people’s brains?

Out of place,,,,maybe micro black holes streaming through Boltzmann brain.

13 hours ago, swansont said:

All oscillations have common behaviors, which is why you can describe them with equations.

It should be utterly unsurprising (the opposite of a revelation) that you see similar behavior.

Which violates rule 2.13

Am I living in the stone age? I meant to say Google Super Intelligence

6 hours ago, MJ kihara said:

Again and again,want to find graviton?...go to/look at super and I mean super dense regions...

This thread is already finished now. You had your chance to help. If you want to contribute towards holographic principle with Gravitons as the projector, feel free to DM me.