MJ kihara

".....just as photon/vitual photon pop out of magnetic fields virtual graviton pops out of gravitational fields....." let me take my pill in the speculation side...red pill is certainly bitter . Observation reign supreme, but in this case it's virtual ...due to uncertainty principle,no further questions. It's also good to emphasis that as 'currently/conventionally' known nothing escape from a blackhole to avoid finality and leave room for further research.

Would you like the mystery to be broken down into parts that can be solved or trying to solve the mystery it's a mystery on itself? The wonderfulness of the brain is a mystery that should not be looked at,is what you are implying?

Why can't the impasse be solved by a having a chimeric particle that transition either way...hhhh kinda of gatekeeper....anyway I know it sounds unconventional and belongs to speculation section,apologies for that.

Offer some clarification about that pliz? In the above case where does the choice or decision comes from? I think the act of deciding is by its self part of consciousness...we should not treat consciousness based on our human capacity as the final definition...I think there are various levels of consciousness depending on the amount of awareness and the extent of deciding(how far you can make unrestricted decision).

Thanks for the article,however,am still not getting the way gravitational field is source of gravity....I don't know how to put it....what am trying to say is gravitational field is gravity,i think talking of gravity and gravitational field is the same thing.

I think self coupling and generating itself are two different issues, anyway,am struggling to understand how gravitational field is a source of gravity...Are there examples supported by observation?

The issue of gravity itself gravitating what is it?

Are you sure its not the urge of your brain to exchange and process information that leads you to discuss? You make 'will' appear as if it's some immaterial matter that can be accessed remotely,so that you can have it or not,is that the case?

Where and when should we ever expect to have one or we just wait for the AI to generate one? Frozen...As in time or as stored memory? Should we go with what classic or quantum theories say or with observation made? Recent observations..JWST..is that there might be older galaxies than our current models predict... supposing they had a blackhole then going by your argument that it's eternal we should be expecting observation of super super supermassive blackhole that could have sucked all of us.....I doubt blackhole don't transition back to normal spacetime (average curvature).

Stay tuned.

You cannot create nor destroy energy...I think blackhole is more of energy,that is, enormously packed energy, whose impact induces the gravity that we detect from blackhole. Therefore,blackhole cannot suddenly disappear maybe transition to other energy forms i.e evaporate through Hawking radiation...the distance as experienced by the photon or observer near a black is highly warped.. therefore, photons moves at speed of light near the blackhole,for outside observer the clock appear slower to compensate for invariance of speed of light.

There is a need for a better model/ theory that clarify how and why there is the exchange of 'virtual photon' I think there might be two issues of 'virtual photons' and attraction of oppositely charged particles that are displayed in electromagnetism that makes the definition of virtual particles from Wikipedia,which is somehow valid,seem ambiguous.

Before we look at artificial neural network thinking...how do you know you are thinking,what makes someone conclude thinking is taking place?

I think it will depend on the frequency of gravitational wave and the magnitude of gravitational lensing...since gravitational waves are a result of propagation of spacetime curvature disturbances,it's expected that any warping of spacetime caused by mass inducing gravitational lensing will affect curvature of spacetime that inturn will affect the way disturbances are propagated, assuming gravitational waves propagate radially from mass source and light moves in a straight line propagated by a photon, gravitational lensing in this case will be of different kind...the detector for gravitational lensing will have to work following different principles for light and for gravitational waves.

Ha ha..😂 remember matrix(the movy) where everyone becomes agents of the system....do we need a red pill...

When I was new to this forum I used to ask myself if Swansont is a person or a group of persons?...anyway,I got stuck to the forum and those questions vanished. However,those kind of questions start coming back again when the forum becomes offline or when some of residential experts takes a longer period of time without posting.

👀 gravitational waves are spacetime curvature disturbances.

The issue of superluminal velocities should not be be treated in a manner that its against SR and GR since both are well tested theories...the only possible route is to come with away that they co-exits each(SR/GR and superluminal effects) within their own domain.

Yes of course and it doesn't need to be based on life on Earth biochemistry nor it's DNA/RNA system. That's why I like sticking on speculation section.

Maybe given enough time it's equilibrium... forward arrow of time (Universe expansion) favors matter formation while backward arrow of time( Universe contraction) favors antimatter formation... Probably leading to an aspect of global time and local time hence T asymmetry,which leads to T violation which is difficult to detect experimentary since we are local observers...the mere fact that matter dorminates presently maybe of itself enough to prove T violation.

Matter and antimatter made up of the same stuff...the stuff is influenced similarly by gravity probably,therefore,matter and anti matter interact in the same manner with gravity..after all, matter-anti matter annihilate to produce energy which is equivalent to mass c^2.

?????? We need EM concept reloaded to make wave-particles nature of a photon more clearer.

You have to establish common ground for arguments...i.e which number base are you using when comparing 2 and 3. https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.mathsisfun.com/numbers/bases.html&sa=U&ved=2ahUKEwjdoa63y4CBAxX71AIHHb2zBtIQFnoECAIQAg&usg=AOvVaw0kqHKB77MQRP7C2cFfIu1z

What about the scale factor? If the green polygon represent the universe,then they are two different universes..with different metrics...meaning you are making wrong volume comparison.

I think we need to re-axamine nature of time...the issue of time reversal should not be completely concluded on observations based on observable universe alone,it's known dark matter and dark energy make the largest part of the universe. Fundamental understanding of time,what it is and it's origin should be clarified before using time as the reason to claim 'not anything' can escape from a blackhole.