MJ kihara

I don't know how you are looking at it. Hz^-1 equate to a second...then it will be 1×10−64 J⋅s. I can see your agreeing with my take regarding to OP

We should stick to the thread appropriately to avoid highjacking.

There more correspondence and symmetry to be discovered it's not like we are at end of the world..once we accept to come out of fear mongering echoes filled cocoon, problems like yang-mills mass gap issues can be easily deciphered ....they is nothing wrong with intuition as long as you are not doing magic,provided intuition is followed by scientific explanations...once person intuition can be different to another person intuition..if person is able to use his intuition well and good.

Well understood. Neither did I mean that. Correspondence and symmetry arguments work best when the urge of cherry picking is contained. Back to the first axiom of equivalency.

My question is simple can michelson-morley type experiment be able to detect a particle with an energy of 1×10−64 J or a stream of such particles @ 1×10−64 J⋅Hz−1 Discuss....My intake is NO.

That's not the point of discussion; you don't get it.

In what context? That sentence was part of a statement. or rather, a reply to request for further clarification/explanations following a conversation.

When the map breaks down at some points cause the territory happened to be wrapped in a manner the map can't handle or the territory behaves in a manner the map can't explain...what we end up with is the best map of the territory,not the territory.

🙏 ...even me I wonder the purpose of all these...it always take me back to mainstream concept,however,for me, with high form of controversial interpretation like for instance all have been doing is interpreting eiπ +1=0 in unconventional way....the weird thing I never started there but I ended up there. The latest part,is when I talked about 'metric emerging ' it was becoming clearer to me,I may also be dealing with Holography...talking about confusion....this makes me EVEN MORE CONFUSED....it's knocking on the gates of believe...what to be believe or not...you can imagine projection giving rise to physical distance...I need a break... Holography is a mainstream science.

😂 AI agent.

I now get it...I been obsessed by my former thread...I saw it as an opening for me to lay out my thinking. Sorry for misunderstanding It was a form of irony... however I was satisfied by;

Once bitten twice shy. I can assure you, there is no need,esp after all those red flags. Modred used to steer things around when it comes to my ideas...I asked about understanding of saying ''metric emerging '' I never gotten any replies..am sure if he was present in the forum there could have been a rich discussion pertaining that issue. Some people are stuck with my former perception, I now understand GR mathematics better,therefore, scaring me with terms won't work,like Christoffel symbols....just use change in basis vector... connection...use the conditions of doing parallel transporting operation....curvature...use deviation from uniformity. in short am aware of these mathematics and how it relates to my ideas...am not filling my lack of knowing gaps...what am saying;am also working hard to study as more physics aspects as possible and you know what's amazing sometimes i get stuck, when I get referencing from the 'theory' I get by rather quickly... a good example entanglement and violation of bell inequalities....it's more about synchronization...source information and gaussian distribution... what's a wonderful thing 👍. Thanks for the offer, however,the condition around is clear...forum is not ready for that.

I don't get it. Open a thread on the theory?. "...It's own thread..." How?

It seems it gets worse whenever I try...you know MigL i can just start playing to the rhythm by posting what's already established what I need to do is just paraphrase it ..and I won't quarrel with anyone around...I think I have a not so bad understanding....my ranking by now could be shining in forum...which one is easier? A criticism is not issued to be liked...anyway, I analyse it carefully..I go through my threads to try figure out any useful thing I get from criticism. I get you. Have always asked my self why do I keep pushing...I think self censorship should be given as a condition,coz that is what getting in my mind...esp when someone start deleting and rewriting sentences. Jigsaw puzzle when added at rate beyond comprehension can lead to catastrophy....that I think it's my case..when I was new in the forum I talked about neutrinos but in a language that was more poetic, it's part of jigsaw.I talked about jumping out of black hole also more poetic and more of an irony...is it possible for me to convince these people( scientific community entrenched in established science)?...I engaged in talks about consciousness it lead me to highjacking label..e.t.c..e.t.c then finally in the parameter of TOE...I atleast outlined the condition necessary, waited to see anyone able to challenge the conditions,no one forthcoming...I went for it. All this are part of jigsaw...so huge with a lot of implications I expected what is happening... My problem according to me is dealing with a lot of jigsaws...I feel time doesn't wait for even kings....the feeling got worse when someone posted in these forum how a Chinese AI, Deepseek,answered about consciousness,after reading the conversations,it was like I was in an echo chamber. The issue with me is that the jigsaw already has been filled in my head and already the mind has settled with that,therefore,it's like a library has formed,where I just rush to look for answers....when they talk about rotation curve being flat and extending with no limit in sight..it gets me back to why I fundamentally stated further than speed of light... anyway before that fact,there are complicated arguments in between that I am now becoming a ware it's beyond the scope of this forum. The limit that am facing is why is it like this. Correct... sometimes I get my self agreeing with you unconditionally. ..Are this rules made of diamond pillars...why can't you consider the challenge of our time that new intelligence is emerging faster than we can handle...and make amendments so that this rules are made of rubber pillars...I.e they can bend or be reviewed after a while? I don't intent to preach around but when somebody start declaring my lack of physics knowledge is deep like mariana trench..those declaration are magnified soapboxing...anyway I get the need of protecting one of your own ... I appreciate the time spend contributing to the forum...I can't provide such man hour in the forum... My intention was not and has not been to change Planck's constant...it's a constant it will always remain to be a constant...My discovery relates to it's importance as a constant and how it relates to the Virtual particles (related to space time) I was talking about, and to the conventional virtual particles,off shell particles(related to quantum fluctuations)...within... ℏ →0....ℏ →1... Cycle. When the pot contains a lot of things then ...shut it up, I mean close it then put it on a lot of heat....its given, naturally, it while ramble if not explode. A lion is not a cow...I don't understand when lions started cowing. Is there anything like negotiated science? You let facts flow..if you tailor make your designed facts and fill the jigsaw it will be your jigsaw;your Universe,and of course it won't fit coz we know of this only universe..you let facts fit the natural universe where there already established facts ...am I going against GR ...my answer NO!...am going against QM my answer NO!...what am I doing ;Adding new perspective! is it comfortable NO! to established perspective...what should I do...you can propose a solution there. When was new in the forum I saw how people Ideas were shut without disdain...that scared me a lot,given the time have spend doing this(developing/comprehending the theory...I wonder the best term...coz it's not me developing it,I let it develop it's self...I should be forgiven for using me developing it... revealing it...waaa....I don't know how to say not to be contradictory)...all this discussions have been provocations to gauge the ground if it's mature to handle it, so far so good all signals are overwhelming negative...am afraid I might even be challenging a lot of entrenched believes. I have to wait...tho time doesn't wait,not even for kings. Am not ready to go jumping a cross the internet looking for even more crack pots.Am trapped.

Can someone tell us how does discovery comes about?

Putting religious beliefs aside...you must have spent a good part of your life thinking about nature... I know this might be off topic...since you are a monk and at the same time a scientist where do you think people go after dying? What do you think will be the role of AI in religion esp after it outsmart humans?

Rotation curve of galaxies stays flat for millions of light years with no end in sight. https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2024/06/240617173533.htm Someone coming up with something that can provide understanding for such issue and do it in a manner that can even be intuitive to a layman. Does that person fit in your explanation of a stereotype; typically, not long lived 'in these here part's'... 😉 ????

Yes it is...let me stop...you people in the forum have a good time.

Very little and basic math...you don't use heavy math on laymen...after getting the essence,math follows.

...mmm...

Go Amazon and search for it there...if you are able...go through it patiently then it will give intuition to a lot of things.

Am a simple man..not the description your are using,in our culture arguing with a young person is bad...all the same,personal traits like calmness has nothing to do with reasoning to everyone.

I have already developed the theory...and published a book using simple layman language that even if another less developed civilization come about they would update themselves to the current level rather quickly.I was patiently outlining critical issue before all the picture come out...for instance if I tell you those virtual particles have a connection to the rotation curve of Galaxy what will you say...just laugh and say am hallucinating. I was barely scratching the surface...I was laying the ground work...I came to these place coz it is a community of mostly scientist...I never thought personal issues will be put upfront...like someone has pride... what's that? Am from humble background....where I am, getting time to chat all the day is not a cup of tea.

Which people? don't bundle me with other crack pots....you seem to know physics a lot...you could have helped joigus in your understanding of 'metric emerging'...you don't even have a clue...there was enough reason why I enquired about residential expert before i went back to the thread...simple mathematics but not enough understand it...I don't engage in fancy talks...go back to my threads. Please stop these nonsense....am deriving A TOE..then you say I don't know Planck's constant....which virtual particles off shell particles...start a thread on the virtual particles you are talking about an you how far we go....pliz stop accusing me with weird things without evidence,In the thread i was barely starting...and I could have explained all those issues.

Swansont the moderator....If am not wrong history will judge you harshly..that is,if you care... knowledge should be shared however uncomfortable it .....am referring to your closure of the thread.. Parameters of a theory of everything....such theory can't be created over night or in a span of a year and some few months... and a few thread page posts. Quantum mechanics started a century ago...my thread;what's a mere year and a few months?. I while tell you something in Swahili...among the native language that I come from....I won't translate for you; ..."Akufukuzae akuambii toka!".. Your issue is more than knowledge...and don't bring issues of freedom of speech here since knowledge is universal regardless of language. To the negative red mark: Whoever posted the negative mark should elaborate to us what hubris has got to do with science...when you have uncontrollably power of shutting people down for mere misunderstanding or forcing corrections before you finish what someone is doing that is hubris. Don't try to turn reality upside down to favor your mental status quo. My writing style has proven unique to me..we are at the Age of AI... uniformity doesn't distinguish you from the rest of others or from an AI agent.