Google Docs

Screenshot_20251106_165141_Samsung Notes.jpg

Everywhere I go is locations in my body and amongst those locations in my body that I go many are my physical feelings, even though i am my physical feelings and to be them I must be located where they are at all the time, this happens even though they are all different locations. This means I exist in more than one place simultaneously, even though that is logically impossible to do according to math and science. Isn't this the best evidence that the supernatural exists? Doesn't this show every manmade religion has lied to say that humans cannot do the impossible?

Edited November 6Nov 6 by IAMTHESUPREMEBEING90000000

9 minutes ago, IAMTHESUPREMEBEING90000000 said:

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1YiF333hQ97F8zX3yrTg6Ak8vjZ7HLS-Y/view?usp=drivesdk

Pity you didn't write it here as nobody will look at your g-drive.

Do you know what linear algebra and group theory mean ?

Edited November 6Nov 6 by studiot

5 minutes ago, studiot said:

Pity you didn't write it here as nobody will look at your g-drive.

Do you know what linear algebra and group theory mean ?

Yes. If you open the link it shows a screenshot. It takes less than a second to open up the screenshot after clicking on the Google drive link.

The theory takes 5 seconds to read

19 minutes ago, IAMTHESUPREMEBEING90000000 said:

Yes. If you open the link it shows a screenshot. It takes less than a second to open up the screenshot after clicking on the Google drive link.

The theory takes 5 seconds to read

So post it here. We don't trust that your link is healthy. If it's so easy, WHY DIDN'T YOU POST IT HERE?

34 minutes ago, IAMTHESUPREMEBEING90000000 said:

This means I exist in more than one place simultaneously,

Or it means you have a nervous system.

29 minutes ago, TheVat said:

Or it means you have a nervous system.

A nervous system cannot fully explain existing in more than one location simultaneously. An individual like you cannot logically do that. Let alone any of your supposed "math and science", studies that don't contradict one another or logic itself. But I suspect you may not even be following my first few claims here anyway, so, oh well. Lets hope you get it anyway lol.

43 minutes ago, TheVat said:

Or it means you have a nervous system.

Either way. Given the sheer absurdity of your first retort here I highly suspect you arent going to get what im about to tell you here anyway, which is sad considering how absurdly simplistic the concepts are. But oh well, here goes.

Lets say I exist at physical point A on the palm of my hand...as well as physical point B on my nose. Why do I exist at those locations? Well its funny to even ask that here to you, as you claim to know that the nervous system is the locations of human consciousness, the very foundation behind your ENTIRE argument, but knowing your type, youll probably not listen anyway. Either way, of course ill explain it to you even further as obviously either way you arent going to understand my points easily.

Edited November 7Nov 7 by IAMTHESUPREMEBEING90000000

29 minutes ago, IAMTHESUPREMEBEING90000000 said:

A nervous system cannot fully explain existing in more than one location simultaneously. An individual like you cannot logically do that. Let alone any of your supposed "math and science", studies that don't contradict one another or logic itself. But I suspect you may not even be following my first few claims here anyway, so, oh well. Lets hope you get it anyway lol.

Moderator Note

If you can't clarify what you want to discuss by posting/pasting your picture here, there's nothing to discuss. Last chance, um, you.

21 minutes ago, Phi for All said:

Moderator Note

If you can't clarify what you want to discuss by posting/pasting your picture here, there's nothing to discuss. Last chance, um, you.

15 minutes ago, IAMTHESUPREMEBEING90000000 said:

This seems to be nothing more than what you wrote in the opening post. So why include a link to this as if it were something more?

Edited November 7Nov 7 by KJW

49 minutes ago, KJW said:

This seems to be nothing more than what you wrote in the opening post. So why include a link to this as if it were something more?

It is the same exact thing. What i saidz à sense but you seem to be disagreeing here. I hope thats all it is, because otherwise im afraid this "science" community may be even more deranged than I originally suspected...lol

More importantly, please enlighten us all as to how the concepts of location, shapes, objects, and differences dont apply to what I said here.

Edited November 7Nov 7 by IAMTHESUPREMEBEING90000000

12 minutes ago, IAMTHESUPREMEBEING90000000 said:

What i said makes sense but you seem to be disagreeing here.

I didn't comment on the content of what you said. I just questioned why you included the link to the image when it served no purpose other than to induce the forum members to request that you post the image. But as for the content, it seems to lack the substance required for it to be posted as "Linear Algebra and Group Theory".

Even after posting a 'clarification' of your OP, it is still gibberish.
This is a science forum; we expect better.

3 minutes ago, KJW said:

I didn't comment on the content of what you said. I just questioned why you included the link to the image when it served no purpose other than to induce the forum members to request that you post the image. But as for the content, it seems to lack the substance required for it to be posted as "Linear Algebra and Group Theory".

Oh, wonderful. Lol... Let me guess. Youre one of those people that thinks if most people say so, IT IS so. And first of all, I never retorted to any of that nonsense regarding the image being a duplicate...none of the things you or anyone said about it means I did anything foolish here.. So what youre saying is the true gibberish going on here at this point.

39 minutes ago, KJW said:

I didn't comment on the content of what you said. I just questioned why you included the link to the image when it served no purpose other than to induce the forum members to request that you post the image. But as for the content, it seems to lack the substance required for it to be posted as "Linear Algebra and Group Theory".

And the funniest thing about what you said here is how you completely ignore the fact that every concept I included in my original post pertains to algebra and the objects studied in pre k mathematics. Ever heard of geometry? Probably not.

34 minutes ago, MigL said:

Even after posting a 'clarification' of your OP, it is still gibberish.
This is a science forum; we expect better.

Clearly this isnt going anywhere...Lets just use common sense on this one- You arent here to discuss actual geometry or algebra, let alone hassle with the concepts of location, objects, and differences here. Theyre pretty basic concepts for most mathematicians (and as such, for most people as well) but knowing you, none of that matters to explain to you any further anyway. With that said, until you can provide so much as a single reason here as to how anything I said isnt closely related to or able to be demonstrated as a part of linear algebra and group theory, im done with you.

BRUH. Wtf is this thread?

You cant exist at more than one location at the same time. I exist everywhere that my feelings are because i am my feelings. My eye has a feeling in it and my hand does but I exist at those different locations simultaneously. The moderators here cant seem to grasp this. Hilariously, they've also yet to come up with a single counter claim or single cited source for any of their supposed "science and linear math studies". At this point, im just waiting to see if anyone is gonna at least be able to bring up pre k math. At least then we MIGHT be able to get somewhere after a few math lessons taught by me, unfortunately. LOL...

Maybe they should change this to a mental health forum...

Edited November 7Nov 7 by IAMTHESUPREMEBEING90000000

33 minutes ago, IAMTHESUPREMEBEING90000000 said:

Maybe they should change this to a mental health forum...

What is it you want to discuss exactly?

1 hour ago, pinball1970 said:

What is it you want to discuss exactly?

My eye feeling is a location

My hand feeling is a location

They are different locations

I am all of my feelings

I exist where the feeling in my eye exists

I exist where the feeling in my hand exists

I exist at different locations simultaneously

Disprove this using any level of math or any level of science you can? Lets see you try

4 hours ago, IAMTHESUPREMEBEING90000000 said:

BRUH. Wtf is this thread?

You cant exist at more than one location at the same time. I exist everywhere that my feelings are because i am my feelings. My eye has a feeling in it and my hand does but I exist at those different locations simultaneously. The moderators here cant seem to grasp this. Hilariously, they've also yet to come up with a single counter claim or single cited source for any of their supposed "science and linear math studies". At this point, im just waiting to see if anyone is gonna at least be able to bring up pre k math. At least then we MIGHT be able to get somewhere after a few math lessons taught by me, unfortunately. LOL...

Maybe they should change this to a mental health forum...

To make you feel more at home, you mean?

2 hours ago, exchemist said:

To make you feel more at home, you mean?

LMFAO

Can you exist in more than one place simultaneously? Are you your feelings? If you are your feelings, do you exist everywhere that your feelings exist? Do your feelings exist in different locations? The fact that you still haven't answered these questions already shows who should be on a mental health forum here, and it isnt me. Lol.

6 hours ago, pinball1970 said:

What is it you want to discuss exactly?

How do I exist at different locations simultaneously?

Edited November 7Nov 7 by IAMTHESUPREMEBEING90000000

14 minutes ago, IAMTHESUPREMEBEING90000000 said:

How do I exist at different locations simultaneously?

You don't. Your mind paints a picture for you, you are in Prague in a pub and also in Oldham.

The pub is a mental picture, it is not a real pub, you are actually in Oldham.

Being physically somewhere and thinking of other places does not mean you exist in those other places.

4 minutes ago, pinball1970 said:

You don't. Your mind paints a picture for you, you are in Prague in a pub and also in Oldham.

The pub is a mental picture, it is not a real pub, you are actually in Oldham.

Being physically somewhere and thinking of other places does not mean you exist in those other places.

I didnt say thats how it works. I said that to be your physical sensations you must exist where they all physically are simultaneously existing while occupying space in 3 dimensional reality. Now If you dont think you are your physical sensations then thats different...

Edited November 7Nov 7 by IAMTHESUPREMEBEING90000000

10 hours ago, IAMTHESUPREMEBEING90000000 said:

a single reason here as to how anything I said isnt closely related to or able to be demonstrated as a part of linear algebra and group theory, im done with you.

You don't want to discuss math or group theory.

5 hours ago, IAMTHESUPREMEBEING90000000 said:

I exist at different locations simultaneously

You want to play word games.

Just what do you mean by 'exist' ?
And there is no simultaneity.

Just now, MigL said:

You don't want to discuss math or group theory.

You want to play word games.

Just what do you mean by 'exist' ?
And there is no simultaneity.

I want to discuss them. Its just that id like to discuss them afterwards of the topic im bringing up, since its a revolutionary idea that supercedes those fields in importance. Exist means alot of things but for physical feelings it implies and requires occupying space. Different physical feelings simultaneously can exist. They do all across your body.

Your brain, your eyes, your finger tips, your toes, etc. are separated by a distance.
Light/information has a finite speed, so it is impossible, by strict definition, for the 'feelings' to be simultaneous.
Further, electrical signals through nerve fibers travel much, much slower, making 'simultaneity of existence' a ridiculous idea.

29 minutes ago, MigL said:

Your brain, your eyes, your finger tips, your toes, etc. are separated by a distance.
Light/information has a finite speed, so it is impossible, by strict definition, for the 'feelings' to be simultaneous.
Further, electrical signals through nerve fibers travel much, much slower, making 'simultaneity of existence' a ridiculous idea.

Rub your fingertips together at the same time for both hands.

34 minutes ago, IAMTHESUPREMEBEING90000000 said:

I want to discuss them. Its just that id like to discuss them afterwards of the topic im bringing up, since its a revolutionary idea that supercedes those fields in importance.

There can be no discussion until you support this assertion. Just saying your idea supersedes mainstream science isn't nearly enough. The science you're talking about has mountains of evidence to support it. What have you got to support your claims?

Also, I'm not sure if you're just being defensive about your idea, but your approach to the subject is very confrontational and abusive. Is this because of pushback you've received in the past? Please get off that high horse and talk to us, try to persuade us that your idea is valid. No need for all the trollish behavior, we're willing to listen and critique objectively.