I believe they suck in gravity, the strong nuclear force, and the magnetism aspect of electromagnetism and then spit them out as dark matter.

I believe they suck in light, the weak nuclear force, and the electro aspect of electromagnetism and spit them out as dark energy.

If I was to ask myself what dark matter is, it surely seems like a blend of those. If I were to ask myself what dark energy is, it surely seems like a blend of those

Of course I could be wrong. Probably am wrong. It just seems super coincidental to me that it fits.

But that is, also, part of the beauty and frustration with science. "Seems to be" is a trap. Ask ol' Isaac

Edited July 4Jul 4 by deema_d

And some people believe that God created the universe ... and they, like you, have no evidence to support their beliefs either.

Come back when you want to discuss facts and evidence ... NOT beliefs.

Concur - belief is not science, and we’re a science discussion site.

Got a mathematical model that can be compared with evidence? We’ll be happy to discuss.

17 hours ago, deema_d said:

Of course I could be wrong. Probably am wrong. It just seems super coincidental to me that it fits.

Just to add for future readers, this is pretty common. Starting out learning science, much of the knowledge is interconnected. The more you understand about one aspect, the easier it is to grasp the next. When you jump ahead of your own knowledge, getting excited about a popular science article on something advanced like black holes, the conclusions you draw seem fairly basic and super coincidental because you're trying to complete a puzzle when pieces are missing. Our ignorance manufactures puzzle pieces to fit, and we have to be careful about that.