Dimensions (split from Could an electron just be a particles conservation of charge ?)

[Elmore]

Quarks (no spatial extension) experience all 3 fundamental forces plus have a fractional electric charge⚡and that's why protons and neutrons (spatial extension) have electrons orbiting around them.

 

In Geometry any new dimension has to contain within it all previous dimensions. This holds true with it being impossible for protons and neutrons (spatial extension) to exist without subatomically containing within themselves quarks (no spatial extension).

 

"Something (spatial extension) from Nothing (no spatial extension)".

[Genady]

6 hours ago, Elmore said:

In Geometry any new dimension has to contain within it all previous dimensions.

It does not seem to be correct. For example, the dimension "height" does not contain within it the dimensions "length" and "width".

[swansont]

11 hours ago, Elmore said:

Quarks (no spatial extension) experience all 3 fundamental forces plus have a fractional electric charge⚡and that's why protons and neutrons (spatial extension) have electrons orbiting around them.

Electrons do not have planetary orbits, and an electron and positron can be in a bound atomic-like system 

11 hours ago, Elmore said:

 

In Geometry any new dimension has to contain within it all previous dimensions. This holds true with it being impossible for protons and neutrons (spatial extension) to exist without subatomically containing within themselves quarks (no spatial extension).

 

"Something (spatial extension) from Nothing (no spatial extension)".

No. To add to what Genady posted - spatial dimensions are orthogonal to each other in basic geometry, which is sorta the opposite of having a new dimension contain other dimensions.

[MigL]

Any point ( no spatial extension ) moving within an area, occupies that area ( of spatial extent )
Now substitute quark for point and nucleon for area.

I really don't understand what you mean.