Jump to content

Neutral simultaneity for two frames.


DimaMazin

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, DimaMazin said:

What experiment did Einstein present to the formula?

The formula is a mathematical result. The question is experimental test of mathematics:

 

8 hours ago, DimaMazin said:

What experiment proves the mathematics?

 

If mathematics is correct, then the formula is correct. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Genady said:

The formula is a mathematical result. The question is experimental test of mathematics:

 

 

If mathematics is correct, then the formula is correct. 

We consider physics and the mathematics has no relation to the physics.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, DimaMazin said:

Concrete mathematics was created by smoked brain. We cannot apply it anywhere.

YOU cannot apply it anywhere.

I guess, you understand Russian. This is for you:

Плохому танцору пол мешает.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, iNow said:

Are you trying to win a bet with someone that you can be even more ridiculous and even more profoundly absurd than you already were in previous posts?

I made correct math. Genady don't understand it because he is ortodoxal. You don't understand it because you understant no math at all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/16/2023 at 6:45 AM, iNow said:

Sick burn, bruh

My idea is so. Velocity v is between S and S' . gamma=1/(1-v2/c2)1/2.

Object travels with velocity u  in rame S. Norm of relation between distances and times is defined by gamma.

u is rate of change of distance at time in S and it is the same when S travels in S'. We should only transform it relative to distance and time of S'. Then u transforms into u/gamma. And we should add velocity  v.

u'=v-u/gamma

Einstein's velocity u' is another and therefore it changes norm of contracted and not contracted distances and times. Therefore it is incorrect.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, DimaMazin said:

u'=v-u/gamma

The following example proves that your formula is incorrect.

Take v=.8c, u=-.8c. Plug them into your formula. It gives,

u'=1.28c

which is faster than the speed of light!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/16/2023 at 2:56 AM, Genady said:

YOU cannot apply it anywhere.

I guess, you understand Russian. This is for you:

Плохому танцору пол мешает.

It is exactly incorrect because it violates energy momentum law.

S' is traveling with velocity v in S. We acselerate body to S' then the body has momentum p1 and energy E1. Then we acselerate the body to v2. Then the body has momentum p and energy E . In the same time  the body has momentum p2 and energy E2 in S'.

The enegy momentum law is

E1=(p1/p)2E          E2=(p2/p)2E

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.