23 hours ago, Curious layman said:

What will it enable us to do? 

You did not specify if the 'enable' is technological or not.
 

20 hours ago, mathematic said:

No effects on humanity.

I don't really agree. I am going to give you my opinion.

It would be for example, in a one in two chance, to find the proof of the existence of a creator.

Humanity will be profoundly changed.

21 hours ago, mathematic said:

One immediate consequence, physicists would better understand black holes.

I really agree.

10 minutes ago, Kartazion said:

It would be for example, in a one in two chance, to find the proof of the existence of a creator.

 

How might it lead to the proof of the existence of a creator?

6 minutes ago, zapatos said:

How might it lead to the proof of the existence of a creator?

Example:

God and Stephen Hawking: Whose Design Is It Anyway? by John C Lennox Professor of Mathematics at the University of Oxford

Edited October 22, 20205 yr by Kartazion

For starters, these forums would be swamped by a whole new tsunami of religious types in denial.

5 minutes ago, Kartazion said:

Example:

God and Stephen Hawking: Whose Design Is It Anyway? by John C Lennox Professor of Mathematics at the University of Oxford

Can you summarize?

14 minutes ago, Kartazion said:

Example:

God and Stephen Hawking: Whose Design Is It Anyway? by John C Lennox Professor of Mathematics at the University of Oxford

Sorry I'm not familiar with that. Can you give a bit more detail?

10 minutes ago, joigus said:

Can you summarize?

We can't. We have to open a new thread.

I'm going to do one called "Can science prove the existence of an intelligent world that rules our universe?"

1 minute ago, zapatos said:

Sorry I'm not familiar with that. Can you give a bit more detail?

bis...

46 minutes ago, Kartazion said:

... a one in two chance, ...

Do you think that if there are (apparently) two choices, both are equally likely?

40 minutes ago, pzkpfw said:

Do you think that if there are (apparently) two choices, both are equally likely?

Normally I shouldn't answer because it's off topic. But like swanson or Phi will soon sanction me...let's go.

Scientifically speaking it is yes or no. Do you want the real and the false at the same time? Are you alluding to quantum superposition or what?

I am no longer responding to the off-topic message.