Bell's Theorem is just a strange and backwards way of saying : Pure chance cannot be defined.

 

7 hours ago, Master Lawbringer said:

Bell's Theorem is just a strange and backwards way of saying : Pure chance cannot be defined.

 

 

And your reasoning leading you to this conclusion is................?

Does Bell's theorem have anything to do with randomness? It says something about (classical and quantum) probabilities, but that's not the same thing as randomness.

And, it puts constraints on those (well-defined) probabilities. So it seems the opposite of "cannot be defined".

Randomness can be defined by a variety of statistical tests/definitions. 

It's not, but freedom's just another word for nothing left to lose. What science do you wish to discuss, and what do you have to support your claim?

1 hour ago, Strange said:

Does Bell's theorem have anything to do with randomness? It says something about (classical and quantum) probabilities, but that's not the same thing as randomness.

And, it puts constraints on those (well-defined) probabilities. So it seems the opposite of "cannot be defined".

Randomness can be defined by a variety of statistical tests/definitions. 

No, you have to assume that random functions exist, and then you can study their properties. No modern treatise on probability makes an effort to actually define randomness itself.

Saying it like this is better :

CMPML, Department of System Failure!

Bell's Theorem is just a strange and backwards way of saying : Pure chance cannot be defined.

Remember that Lilith does not have a cui bono motivation.

Remember the Holy Oath of the CMPML :

I swear to eternally Work to banish the Evil Snake so help me God.

Amen and Amen and ...

End of Document.

26 minutes ago, Master Lawbringer said:

 Saying it like this is better :

CMPML, Department of System Failure!

!

Moderator Note

Saying it like that declares you have nothing of value to discuss