omg, my stepdad is watching this show on tv saying that ancient surgury is proof of creationism.

now they are saying neadertals had superglue and that is proof that evolution is rubbish.

roman gynacological instruments are proof of creationism.

tweezers from 400AD is proof of creationism.

 

a drawing of a dinosaur is proof of creationionism. they even said "they could not have drawn them without seeing live dinasaurs."

okay i'm really confused. is this some kind of a joke?

no, it was an actual creationism program. i should have watched it and taken notes. i only caught bits of it. i like how they were saying myan technology disproves evolution.

 

 

it was this show.

now they are saying neadertals had superglue and that is proof that evolution is rubbish.

 

So now god created superglue?? Let's teach ID in shop class!!!

 

Did your stepdad buy it or was he just watching it for the "wtf" factor?

he so believed this crap. i was telling him that all of it was red herrings and actual false information, but he said "still...".

Do you know why they say these are proof or should we just join you in bashing them first and asking questions later?

they didn't say why, they just said it was. they did have the occasional "evolution says our ancestors were morons" type statement, but that is all and wrong as well. they would just spouting red herrings as proof of creationism. if you don't believe me, watch it. i gave a link, you should be able to get a copy.

if you only "caught bits of it" then how would you know they did not have facts to back up some of the arguments?

do you know what a red herring is?

yes, i am aware. but that did not answer my question.

actually, it did.

what i was saying is that you did not listen to the entire thing; therefore, there were parts you missed. you cannot accurately dismiss the ENTIRE program as being bull if you haven't seen it all. that's all.

i watched entire segments. if every single thing i saw(bout 20 min of a 30 min program) was either a red herring or blatant intelectual dishonesty, it is safe to assume the program was rubbish.

oh, alright. from the way you said it, it sounded as if you had only watched small pieces of it.

i apologize. it was a misunderstanding.

roman gynacological instruments are proof of creationism.

 

ROFL

who believes this stuff? Ancient medical equipment is proof that we were created by God? How? I don't see how they're even remotely connected. Wow. Can you say, "gullible?"

I guess they were going for the "God showed them how to do these things and gave them the tools they needed" thing. But still, that "proof" could've been used for the argument that the Gods of the ancient civilizations were aliens as well. I do not see how this proves *creationism* in the least.