icester Posted December 30, 2018 Author Share Posted December 30, 2018 I have updated my paper: OrmanForce.pdf Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Strange Posted December 30, 2018 Share Posted December 30, 2018 3 hours ago, icester said: I have updated my paper: OrmanForce.pdf Unless you have deleted it, I doubt it is any more accurate. And perhaps you should say what you have changed rather than expecting people to remember what it said before. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
swansont Posted December 30, 2018 Share Posted December 30, 2018 5 hours ago, icester said: No, static magnetic field does not induce EMF: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Induction_equation Are you being deliberately obtuse here? You are the one suggesting that such a field should induce an EMF. Are you ready to retract the claims you have made for the last several pages of this thread? Static field means no relative motion which changes the flux. If you have such motion, it's induction. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
icester Posted December 30, 2018 Author Share Posted December 30, 2018 Just now, swansont said: Are you being deliberately obtuse here? You are the one suggesting that such a field should induce an EMF. Static field means no relative motion which changes the flux. If you have it, it's induction. Read the post history carefully or try to remember because I stated at least twice that is Lorentz who claims without experimental confirmation that there is EMF on wire moving with constant linear velocity in uniform and constant magnetic field... Static has many meanings but exact conditions are specified clearly... See the MIT's reference in my updated paper... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
swansont Posted December 30, 2018 Share Posted December 30, 2018 8 hours ago, icester said: Read the post history carefully or try to remember because I stated at least twice that is Lorentz who claims without experimental confirmation that there is EMF on wire moving with constant linear velocity in uniform and constant magnetic field... Static has many meanings but exact conditions are specified clearly... See the MIT's reference in my updated paper... There’s plenty of evidence that Lorentz is correct. I have no plans to waste time by reading your paper. You obviously have no idea what you’re talking about. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phi for All Posted January 14, 2019 Share Posted January 14, 2019 ! Moderator Note Insisting you're right when it's trivially easy to show otherwise is soapboxing, and against the rules. You need to explain and support your ideas rigorously when they conflict with mainstream understanding (it is, after all, a collection of our best current explanations for various phenomena). You've had five pages to do that, and still cling to misunderstandings. Thread closed. Don't bring it up again. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts