Moontanman

I honestly have no clue, I know that at depth red light is gone and my blood was bright green with a yellowish florescence to it. I try to take care not to cut my self underwater but that one time I gashed myself pretty good and bled like a stuck pig. The liberty ship I was diving on was full of sharp metal and swimming around through the ship was likely to get you cut at least slightly. On a positive side I did manage to get some interesting glass glass jugs that had been sunk as garbage when the ship was intentionally sunk. I remember quite clearly swimming across the deck with sunlight glinting all-around me and being surrounded by a cloud of fluorescent green blood.

No I was talking about my blood, if you ever get cut below 30 feet or so the blood will be fluorescent green!

I stand corrected!

This idea of life conforming to the wavelength of light can be seen in plants that grow deep under water. Various colors of plants grow at various depths taking advantage of the filtering of light by water. By the time you get down to around 30 feet red light all but vanishes, blood is florescent green not red and plants that grow deep underwater are various colors from red to brown to yellow. Various pigments are used to supplement chlorophyll and even shift light from UV to visible light all to harvest the sun as efficiently as possible. I see no reason this wouldn't happen on other planets under the light of strange stars.

It's really not religion that pisses me off, it's the people who not only believe but think they have the right to dictate how I live based on their fairy tales.

Why is it silly to critique religion? Religion is in desperate need of critical thinking, in fact religion is a prime source of nonsensical people deceptively tryin to denigrate the very thing that Richard Dawkins is knowledgeable about he has every right to defend Science from. I'm not your honey, and disagreement is not what we are talking about, we are talking about lying to influence people against the reality of the scientific method. Any and all deception is worthy of being denigrated as a reasonable topic of discussion.

I don't give a shit what other people believe or do not believe, all that is important is what you can show and what you are showing is disrespect for reality.

You are trying to poison the well by being a disrespectful jerk, Dawky... really? Religion deserves no respect and Richard Dawkins gives religion none and rightfully so. You seem to be disappointed we don't bow down to your nonsensical disrespect of Dawkins. I respect anyone who stands up to the idea of a god as nonsense and I lack not only a belief in a god I lack respect for you... personally!

I don't get religion either and I am basically uneducated, I just require the things I believe to be real actually exist.

There was a time when I would have supported free speech unconditionally... then came the people who use free speech to make false claims and the gullibility of people to influence them in directions that are anti social at best... see the maga movement.

Since "revealed truth" is simply telling people what you want them to believe regardless of any conflict with reality, possibly actors would be the experts to use?

The expansion is real not something mathematical or made up. The term Big Bang was coined to denigrate the idea of an expanding universe after the expansion was discovered. It is my understanding that the term Big bang was coined after the expansion was discovered not before. Do you have a link? ??? What is the take away from this? We know that the Big Bang Theory is not complete due to it not encompassing quantum mechanics but to say it is naive? I'm not sure where you are coming from on that. Not interested, the name threw me, I regret asking, if you want to discuss religion please start a new thread. Please explain why Einstein's atheism is relevant? The universe can be both infinite and have a beginning... t=0 is the key.

Interesting, I've never heard of Yeshu but you would need to start another thread to explain it to me. None of that sounds familiar to me, quite possibly someone else can answer that.

Revealed Faith is a very popular term in certain circles that believe in magic.

Yes but the term was not a description made by the people who actually supported the idea of the universe having a beginning. They originally described it as an expansion of space and time not an explosion into space and time. The term Big Bang obfuscates the real issue. BTW Yeshu? I am not familiar with that term but I will assume it is some sort of religious greeting.

Are you aware that the term "Big Bang" was a derogatory term used by proponents of the steady state theory to try and demean the idea? Big Bang was never meant to be an accurate description of the beginning of the universe.

Pompous? Moi?

It's the word of the all powerful Yahweh!!! Pay attention... 🫠

I doubt that assertion can be made with 100% certainty... Possibly you can say that for life as we know it but... life finds a way!

I would say that "revealed truth" is one of the most dangerous concepts we currently face. When you have a group of people who view the world through a lens of "faith" it becomes possible to pretty much manipulate people of faith into believing anything.

I missed that dammit!

Are your shirts made of polyester or a polyester blend? Polyester tends to preserve body odor and is difficult to removed body odor. It was one of the problems we worried about when making polyester. The problem was never really solved that I recall.

What do you want to discuss here?

🍼😁🍼 boobas!