njaohnt

You're leaping over the almost 14 BILLION years in between the Big Bang and your computer being manufactured. If you can control your impatience, there are mountains of evidence you can check for yourself that support theories on ways life forms and evolves over such vast amounts of time. You can even keep your creator; perhaps He is much more patient and awesome and studious than you are, and provided the mechanisms that all those billions of years took advantage of.

 

Your argument from from incredulity is one of the weakest there is; it's single advantage is that of saving you all the time of actual learning. Don't be lazy, be smart, study up. How can you ridicule what you don't know?

What I don't know? I do know(but to follow the rules of scientific evidence and this forum, I'll say that I think)! 14 billion years you say? No, I don't think so. They've found Noah's ark on a mountain, it's the same dimensions as the Bible told Noah to build it. If the earth were flooded with water 40 feet above any mountain, that would make the earth seem way older, it would create the layers in the earth that atheists talk about. Also, it makes perfect sense as to why everything that they find(fossils) is so big. The Bible says that all the water from the ground, and all the water from the sky came in for the flood. It also says that no one will live longer than 120 years, but before the flood, people were living long, 750-950 years. So, if there were a large amount of water in the sky, it could protect the world from the sun's radiation, so that things could live long, and grow big. That is enough evidence for me, to go against any other theory, but what really happened, I don't know, but I'm very sure that this is what happened.

Does that go against the rules forums mooeypoo? If it does break them, I am confused. If I broke the rules, give me an example of how I should have done this post.

That's a big-time FAIL for showing how the Big Bang was impossible. Urey-Miller was an experiment showing it very much WAS possible. Just because they were intelligent doesn't mean the Big Bang couldn't have happened without them. That's actually hilarious.

 

I think you need to look up the definition of "impossible"before you ever use the word again.

Okay, here's the deal.

The molecules, and atoms, and everything came, and…what? How could they form life? How is all this here, you, me, the computer that I'm holding, the chair that I'm sitting in? How could all the particles form together?

Really, I can't see this being hilarious to you, but I think the big bang theory is WAY sillier than what I believe.

We'll see if you're laughing when you face eternity burning up in fire…while I'm looking down at you saying "Oh, why didn't he listen to me?".

Now SERIOUSLY! You shouldn't go down to the fire, and I don't want you to. If you change your ways, then you will thank me later. You'll thank me a lot.

What about the dude in South America somewhere that heals people? Now if not convinced yet, go down there, and see the healing in action. Here's how he does it:

He asks them what's wrong.

He does what he needs to do. Sometimes it's stick a stick up their nose, and it does even hurt. Sometimes he sends them to a healing room, where the people sit for three hours, and get healed. Once a guy went there, and the days after, blood poured out of his stomach. He saw that there had been an opening there. Now if you're not convinced, go there and see for yourself.

!

Moderator Note

This is a mainstream science thread that requires mainstream accepted scientific reasoning and evidence-based posts. Religious arguments do not belong here.

 

njaohnt's post was split to its own thread and moved to the Religion forum in case anyone is up for a debate on its merits.

 

Don't post religious and non-scientific arguments in the mainstream science sub forums again, please.

Whoa whoa whoa, the rules say nothing about not posting religious arguments, and my post did not include anything religious(the video did, but not me). There are two similar rules:

Stay on topic. Posts should be relevant to the discussion at hand. This means that you shouldn't use scientific threads to advertise your own personal theory, or post only to incite a hostile argument.

This is not my own theory, it is Case for a Creator's theory, and more people believe their theory, than the big bang(not inside the US, but the majority of the world believes this). Their theory is also completely scientific.

Keep alternative science and your own personal conjecture to the appropriate forum (Speculations). Threads in the ordinary science forums should be answered with ordinary science, not your own personal hypothesis. Posting pet "theories" in mainstream science forums is considered thread hijacking.

Ordinary science? What's ordinary about the big bang? I'm only posting this so that if some administrator comes on here to see if you're wrong I have to say, this is ordinary science, maybe not to you, but like I said, the majority of the world believes this, and it is to me.

Also a similar rule from the administrator of this forum:

Please note that all posts that are baseless in scientific fact or that are outside of mainstream physics can and will be moved to the Speculations forum. Make sure that you think about the nature of your post before you hit the "post" button.

My post was not outside the mainstream of physics, the video included complete scientific evidence of that the big bang did not happen.

Put my post back, or I'll call an administrator.

Impossible. It is impossible that there even was a big bang. If there was a big bang, how did the complex life become? How did the molecules even stick together?

See

That is Case for a Creator, and all of those videos show how there could not be any big bang.

How do they make hydrogen tanks(I also need a oxygen tank, but I assume that it works the same way). If you blow hydrogen into a tank, how would you get the air out? With a gas tank, you're working with a liquid, and a gas, but for gaseous hydrogen, how would you push out the air, and put in hydrogen, without pushing out hydrogen in the tank?

Also, how much volume would you need to fit 1 000 000 000 000 H₂ or O₂.