swansont

Not in the US, for cancer as a whole. The trend is toward a larger fraction surviving 5 years https://progressreport.cancer.gov/after/survival

I don’t think that’s the whole story; forcing the electrons to combine with protons to form neutrons requires energy. You have the degeneracy pressure until you can do that. Or at least, that’s how I understood it.

Don’t reintroduce this unless you have an actual model, and can comply with the rules of speculations.

OK, then

That’s your job. That’s a pretty useless hint.

You’re going to need more than just blurting out physics buzzwords.

One issue is that really heavy nuclei don’t remain intact for very long. There might be some isotopes that are longer-lived at the next magic number (filled shell) of neutrons and/or protons. Pb-208 is doubly-magic, with 82 protons and 126 neutrons, and is the heaviest stable isotope. “Further predicted magic numbers are 114, 122, 124, and 164 for protons as well as 184, 196, 236, and 318 for neutrons.[1][4][5] However, more modern calculations predict 228 and 308 for neutrons, along with 184 and 196.” https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magic_number_(physics) So that’s where to look. We’ve seen 114 protons.

! Moderator Note Suggestions, Comments and Support is geared towards issues on this site. Our moderators are humans, (or bipedal primates, at least). Can’t really do anything about any of these issues.

Our model of atoms comes from quantum mechanics, and from the math it includes it makes testable predictions, which can be confirmed by experiment. You have provided no such framework.

! Moderator Note this isn’t a Dan Brown fanfic site Don’t reintroduce whatever this is.

It’s probably a dynamic IP address assigned by your service provider, so it can change.

! Moderator Note Since this is just soapboxing and likely spam, we’re locking it. If the OP has a topic for discussion, they are free to open up a new thread

Aren’t hurricanes driven by the ocean temperature, which is not going to be affected much in the short term by more clouds?

Yes, you could make it rotate. In fact, it’s hard to not have it rotate, which is why you might put gyroscopes on satellites. A version of these, reaction wheels, are used to re-orient some craft. Small satellites also get pushed around and rotate from radiation pressure, called the YORP effect

! Moderator Note Too bad you didn’t predict these phenomena before they were reported. You still haven’t presented any model that you can point to to say that you could have, despite ample opportunity. So we’re done here. Don’t bring this up again.

! Moderator Note Your thread on this was locked. Don’t bring it up elsewhere, and don’t hijack threads with your pet theory.

! Moderator Note The only context where we discuss AI content is as a check of its veracity. We don’t accept AI content being presented as something to be countered/rebutted. https://www.scienceforums.net/topic/133848-policy-on-aillm-use-on-sfn/

! Moderator Note Youtube link deleted. Posting to advertise a youtube channel is against our rules

Is Gemini an AI program?

You linked to a dotcom website for no apparent reason other than to have a link to it. The link was removed

! Moderator Note Upload removed; violation of rule 2.7 Owing to security concerns, documents must be in a format not as vulnerable to security issues (PDF yes, microsoft word or rich text format, no).

! Moderator Note From rule 2.7 We don't mind if you put a link to your noncommercial site (e.g. a blog) in your signature and/or profile, but don't go around making threads to advertise it

One thing that’s closed is this thread.

Plagiarism is not permitted here. It’s generally discouraged everywhere. From where did you copy/paste? Only part of the statement is in unmatched type.

No, they are not. They tell you the strength and direction of the magnetic field. Not the magnetic force I don’t see where you asked a question