Jump to content

YT2095

Senior Members
  • Posts

    16922
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by YT2095

  1. Alt_f13 yeah, the negative bit is how I see it, I just use "antimatter" as I don`t know what else to call it really. like in my 1`st post (along the lines of antimatter). do you know if this negative stuff has a name at all? I picture an anti hydrogen, atom identical to the ones we have here, but opposite in everyway, but would behave exactly like H does here in it`s OWN universe.
  2. alt_f13 initialy yes it would take time, they`de have to deployed using traditional methods like the helicopter drop, a bit like they do with water, you`de be able to cover more area per load though as the density wouldn`t have to be as great per meter than that of water, and it would have the advantage of leaving a metal oxide layer to stifle further fire atempts and wouldn`t evaporate in the same way water would. a bit like putting sand on fire, except this sand explodes on heating leaving a flame retardant byproduct. thinking about your FAE idea, if they were to be positioned carefuly around an area, with a concrete backing (tamped) something along the lines of claymor effect could be acheived perhaps, creating a form of area denial for oxygen, rather just drop one in the middle and risk it blowing outwards, how about outside blowing inwards? any thoughts? Glider, Yes I remeber seeing it now (I thought it was a nuke they wanted to drop though? but it was a long time ago).
  3. so your saying that the reciprocal of Zero isn`t exactly infinity but every/any number between zero and infinity? wouldn`t that be the same thing though or is it some weird maths stuff? (I`m hoping to take pre-university entry maths this year, so you can tell I`m certainly no expert). I am still non the less intrigued by this
  4. What the Phuk??? this is ANOTHER thread I`m leaving now
  5. what`s this "Outbreak" thing about? and don`t say a film or acne rellated ) Glider, a Thermobaric device or ANY sort of device that alter the barometric pressure into the nagative would be usefull, however it would have to be for a sustained period of time (cretainly more than a few minutes for hardwood fires) maybe great for grass fires with a ground crew ready to move in to catch the remainders. but even a low yeild nuke wouldn`t shift the volume air neccesary for a large fire, and certainly not for long enough, I still recon something akin to "Dragon eggs" would be the best way for most fires, used in conjunction with traditional methods.
  6. ok, I`ll stick my neck out here... WHAT PAINTING? you make references to things only YOU understand, I for one am not a mindreader, and for 2, what the phuk am I even doing TRYING to get my head round this?????? sorry and all that d00d, but it`s a bit to "wiggly" for me as a topic
  7. ROFLOL, I wasn`t gunna say that myself, but I sure thought it
  8. Oooops MY bad! I didn`t see the `-` in the second term were used + in the 1`st.... term 1 and 2 looked the same.... forgive my oversight
  9. surely if the 1`st term = X and the second = X also then a subtraction of X-X=0 regardless of what X might equal after the 1`st term? (still haven`t grabbed ma calc yet tho )
  10. never seen it, but at 1`st glance looks a bit self defeating, and so I`de guess at Zero? I`ll check when I get more time though
  11. well I see it like this, when the big bang happened, particles that seperated (matter and anti ) that were IN PHASE with us at this point of the bang would scatter throughout their respective universes at same distances velocities charges etc... and therfore follow identical paths to ours. just one would be OURS (you and me now) and the other would be theirs (still you and me, but diametricly opposed in evreyway, they wouldn`t even know it. WE would be the odd ones ).
  12. <off topic I know, sorry> Dave, you`re a Brummie? ))
  13. giving you the bennefit of the doubt here that you`re not a TOTAL stoner. can you put your original post into more conscise terms? @ least in such a way that it makes a LITTLE sense All the best
  14. I expect you`de look really rather silly doing it
  15. forgive me if I`m way off base here, but isn`t Zero just the reciprocal of infinty and vice versa anyways?
  16. Umbabula speaks: When you create a loop in time it inherently become infinate __________________ yes it does, but non interfering and non cumulative either else it would have been that way the 1`st time round it will ALWAYS be out of phase by however long you traveled back by. and even if you TRIED to get get back to intercept your original "landing" you`de still be out of phase by the time taken to make that jump and even if you COULD time it to an INFINATE`th farction of a pico second and BE in phase( you couldn`t) since two objects cannot be in the same plase at the same TIME, you`de be double dense mush! do this an infinate amount of times and you`ll reach critical mass and turn back into energy, and that would bring us right back to the E=MC^2 equasion and so by default the bucket effect is at best an interesting "story" but implausible
  17. alt_f13, fair enough, but when there exists more than 20x the amount needed to wipe the planet out (overkill in my book) surely minus the odd one or 2 wouldn`t really be all THAT BAD?
  18. FAE`s are ok to snuff peolpe out low OB desensitised primararies would be even better in low wind conditions. Loki, Silver Iodide cloud seeding would also in certain circumstances be a viable idea also. alt_f13 explosives of the CORRECT type would be perfectly viable route to take as well, but each fire and fire type must be also be judged by it`s own "merits" and prevailing conditions... there is no ONE single answer. many times a combination of ideas are needed to secure a possitive result, and maybe the never the same combination twice
  19. all I can remember is that it was some guys that used their own telescopes, then bought scope time at a better one, and THEN bought Hubble time. they didn`t publish at 1`st because the idea seemed to ridiculous, but simultaniously on the other side of the world the same discovery was made and they published, soon to be reinforced by theoriginal scientists. apparantly we`re aware of only 5% of the types of mater that exist (think periodic table) the other 95% and it`s attributes, we don`t have a clue about! exciting and daunting at the same time if you ask me.
  20. absolutely!!! and the updrafts/currents are tremendously powerfull the dragon eggs work as an explosive/fire retardant in the same micro second. YES it`s a thermite, but not the sort that folk read about on these stupid sites, it`s an exotic thermite that after reaching a certain temp will explode with incredible velocity! spreading a NON flammable layer of metal/metal oxides over the surrounding area and before anyone says that metals are BAD for plants, think again! and read the side of a box of general plant food then count the metals/minerals in it the ones that DON`T eplode would simply dissolve in the rain over a few seasons, the ons that do will blast an area around it making fire NULL and leave a coating that`s fire retardant a dragon egg the size of a pin head will OBLITERATE a cigarette end! (I`ve done it) so thumb nail size should clear an area at least a foot around and spread it`s oxides well over 20 foot per ball! ) picture them 6 inches appart in a blaze! )))))))
  21. yeah, I`de have to go with that too, as blast alone would have be enormous!!!!! the other option is as I mentioned above, something with a low OB, but either case would require a low wind so as not to move the gasses too much before they could work. and from what I can gather, the fire alone creates it`s own winds, and so MAY negate both possibilities
  22. @ least Octane gets ya to the pub! even though ya can`t use it on the way back )
  23. aha! maybe you`r thinking of secondary explosives with a low OB (oxygen ballance) perhaps, as halon in an explosive would reform into it constituany parts and the CH groups are flammable and halides are poisonous. perhaps under low ambient wind conditions explosives such as TCAP, HMTD, TNT, MEKP etc... could be used, because of their low OD and the DV (detonation velocity) is a bonus too for the vacume effect, and the byproducts are mostly CO CO2 and N. only problem is... with exception of TNT , the others are primary explosives and MAY datonate from impact after the fall from a helicopter and are TOO unstable in quantity to carry (vibrations) and TNT is a secondary explosive and will just burn without a det-cap I`ll stick to "dragons eggs" good idea and right thinking though )
  24. 3 or 4 minutes!, that`s gotta be a NUKE! infact a nuke blast wave wont do that for more than 2 mins at 10m tons! and that aint even an O2 "blackout" thats pressure differential on intitial and echo shockwaves (implode). IMI. are you sure it`s just a "bomb" and not something a little more sophisticated at all? maybe some sort of explosive dispersal mechanism perhaps?
  25. Daisy, No matter how your current "Boss" is with you or anyone else in your life that treats you this way, the fact that YOU recognise that it`s WRONG! and hurts folks, will ALWAYS make YOU the better person! the day they can rob you of that, is the day they win! Hang in there girl!
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.