Genady

Can't be less than zero; nobody survived WTC collapse. I think, in such a short time it was a chaotic system, without defined pressure or temperature.

Over the years, I had five unauthorized transactions. Every time the bank caught it before me, and I was never charged. Three times the bank system flagged a "suspicious" transaction and they waited for me to confirm it. I know that this is not a representative statistic. Just data.

This is OT, but I don't think so. AI is trained to mimic people. The machines will mimic the pretty pointless arguments effectively, too.

It is a matter of idealization. This page from Misner, Thorne, Willer explains:

Just funny. Reader's Digest has published an article entitled, 50 Science Trivia Questions People Always Get Wrong (With Answers) (rd.com). They could add a 51st question, "Is astrology a science?" According to their own first paragraph, the answer is, yes:

In such a short time the system perhaps did not reach thermal equilibrium, so the incineration might be not total. Some DNA might be found.

Can you estimate how this impact on a human body compares to that of a crushing WTC tower?

Sounds like a very mild, temporary schizophrenia.

Some people get disappointed with their official religious institutions but instead of dumping the whole notion of religion they go to a softer, mystical version including some forms of paganism.

I knew several otherwise sane people who sensed/felt God/Jesus/angel/spirit/etc. Yes, it would, but I doubt such an objective definition exists. As some old saying goes, "we don't only know what we see, but we see what we know."

Agree with everything except one point. I don't see a requirement to prove God's existence. One could sense God regardless of its existence, as pointed in some comments above (by @mistermack, I think).

I read that the percentage of people who answer "none" to the question of religion, is rising. This is much better than switching one religion for another.

This is true. However, nothing prevents God from being "a region of space where the gravity prevents light from escaping". IOW, your answer to the question, "How do we know that it is not God?" is that we don't know, and I agree with it. My point is that for the lack of knowledge, we "choose this as the most likely reason out of all the other possibilities." (My emphasis.) I think that there is no reason for this choice, but I know why I make it. I just don't like the alternative, it stinks.

Yes, or a setup.

I can't tell by your comment if you see the animal there.

Just announced: 'Presumed human remains' found in debris field of doomed Titan submersible, US Coast Guard says | CNN

Nice, +1, albeit I don't consider it a natural camouflage.

There is some, e.g., Titan implosion: What happened to bodies and will they ever be recovered? (geo.tv) Breaking news: 'Presumed human remains' found in debris field of doomed Titan submersible, US Coast Guard says | CNN

Super Massive Black Hole with Quantum Hair. Yep, it's God.

Any.

There is credible evidence to support the existence of a supermassive black hole in the center of our galaxy. How do we know that it is not God?

But by what definition? Does not this number depend on how one decides to "conceptually compartmentalize it", as @joigus has described here, https://www.scienceforums.net/topic/127423-why-cant-one-sense-god/?do=findComment&comment=1243802? Is not it arbitrary?

Thank you to everyone!

Thank you, @TheVat! I've noticed that few of these negs disappeared and suspected that mods took care of that. Good to know that it was you.

I am pretty sure it was the same person who downvoted half a dozen of my posts about the same time. We both know that person now.