Genady

-About the abilities of the blood cells in Humans with stigma. Can they really carry more complex and efficient combination in elements except oxygen O₂ that produce more energy? -If yes do you believe those cells are worthy to further test in a lab? if they are special could potential give an easy impact to re-engineer the human being? -How can we test this theory? Are there any animals with stigma? So, you do not want to discuss a discussion.

The solution that I referred to in the previous post (https://www.scienceforums.net/topic/134306-can-truth-contradict-itself/page/2/#findComment-1284392) is weak, IMO. I think my other solution is rather strong, but I couldn't find it in the Irish myths I looked at.

It takes two to tango.

This is baloney. I can describe, e.g., a mermaid, without testing, observing, or believing in it.

I don't think there is anything wrong with it.

No. A description does not need to be tested or observed. A hypothesis or a prediction does. (I don't make any claims about existence of nothing, either before or after the universe.)

This comment has nothing answering my question.

Why not? Here is the description: "Nothing." What is unscientific about it?

If you want to discuss a discussion you need to make clear what about that discussion you want to discuss.

I found on the Internet (with no LLM help) a story of the king with initials B.B., which fits one of the solutions I've thought about. Is that the one? P.S. An LLM's answer was wrong, again.

This is the only meaningful piece in this whole thread so far, IMO. I can think of several ways to solve this apparent contradiction, basically by separating its parts in space or in time. I'll wait for the "textbook answer."

You are the one playing with words.

No, he is not. You are. For example, there is not even a mention of the word "equation" in the article. So also, the rest of your claims.

No, they have not. No, it is not. No, it is not either.

I didn't know them in my childhood. I rather grew up on Andersen's and Brothers Grimm's fairy tales. Here is a refresher: Just So Stories, by Rudyard Kipling

The original Just So Stories were entertaining at least.

I have asked you, why do you think that 0 and 1 and can you prove that without 0 and 1 Your answer is None of these statements answers my questions. You just repeat your claims without proof or justification. I read it that you do not have a proof or a justification. "It is so because it is not otherwise!" Your position is not supported. OTOH, I know that foundation of mathematics does not require 0 and 1, together or separately, and also that 0 and 1 are far from being sufficient to provide foundation of mathematics. 0 was a great invention, but mathematics existed and did well for a couple of thousands of years without it. And what about imaginary number "i"? Why it is not in the foundation of mathematics? Or irrational numbers? How about group theory? Groups have only one identity element, which can be 0 or 1 (or something else), but not two of them. Your theory is very narrow and superficial.

Sorry, I don't understand all this. I referred to the T-shirt saying "Fuck Putin" that I helped you to make in Cyrillic a couple of years ago. Perhaps you didn't make that connection.

It does not help because the conflict is not between Torah-respecting Jews and Muslims. P.S. Btw, I thought about you today because I saw in the town a guy in a T-shirt covered with the famous picture of shirtless Putin on a horse and arm covered with tattoo saying "Putin" and "Z" (I didn't see the other arm.) He didn't look like a tourist. Perhaps, a Russian crew from a cargo ship although the tattoo was in English.

What does make you think so? Can you prove this statement? How do 0 and 1 in mathematics relate to Objective and Subjective aspects in language?? Can you prove this?

I strongly (emotion) disagree (controversy). Engagement is driven by curiosity and intellectual challenge.

I don't equate "novice" with "without knowledge". We all were novices once.

I don't recall any of the banned users that would be contributing to the forums if they stayed.

A teacher should be able to help with solving sample problems. However, several times I have checked, LLMs got stuck with wrong solutions in spite of my attempts to point to where these solutions go wrong. This happens even when correct solutions are available on the Internet and are easily findable with a simple straightforward search.

... and of the rate of posting not growing exponentially or faster.